1.Allen, P. (ed.). 1993. Food for the Future: Conditions and Contradictions of Sustainability. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
2.Berardi, G.M., and Geisler, C.C. (eds.). 1984. The Social Consequences and Challenges of New Agricultural Technologies. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
3.Bird, E.A.R., Bultena, G.L., and Gardner, J.C. (eds.). 1995. Planting the Future: Developing an Agriculture That Sustains Land and Community. Iowa State University Press, Ames.
4.Brumm, M.C., Harmon, J.D., Honeyman, M.S., and Kliebenstein, J.T.. 1997. Hoop structures for grow-finish swine. Agric. Engrs. Digest AED 41. MidWest Plan Service, Ames, IA.
5.Busch, L. (ed.). 1981. Science and Agricultural Development. Allanheld, Osmun, and Co. Publishers, Totowa, NJ.
6.Busch, L., and Lacy, W.B.. 1981. Sources of influence on problem choice in the agricultural sciences: The new Atlantis revisited. In Busch, L. (ed.). Science and Agricultural Development. Allanheld, Osmun, and Co. Publishers, Totowa, NJ. p. 113–130.
7.Busch, L., and Lacy, W.B.. 1983. Science, Agriculture, and the Politics of Research. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
8.Busch, L., and Lacy, W.B. (eds.). 1986. The Agricultural Scientific Enterprise: A System in Transition. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
9.Buttel, F.H., and Busch, L.. 1988. The public agricultural research system at the crossroads. Agric. History 62:303–324.
10.Buttel, F.H., Larson, O.F., and Gillespie, G.W. Jr., 1990. The Sociology of Agriculture. Greenwood Press, New York.
11.Cochrane, W. 1958. Farm Prices. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
12.Connor, M.L. 1993. Evaluation of biotech housing for feeder pigs. Manitoba Swine Update 5(3):1–2.
13.Coughenour, C.M., and Christenson, J.A.. 1983. Farm structure, social class, and farmers' policy perspectives. In Brewster, D.E., Rasmussen, W.D., and Youngberg, G. (eds.). Farms in Transition: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Farm Structure. Iowa State University Press, Ames. p. 67–86.
14.Dillman, D.A. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. Wiley and Sons, New York.
15.Freudenburg, W.R. 1983. The promise and peril of public participation in social impact assessment. In Daneke, G.A., Garcia, M.W., and Priscoli, J.D. (eds.). Public Involvement and Social Impact Assessment. Westview Press, Boulder, CO. p. 227–234.
16.Friedland, W.H., and Barton, A.. 1975. Destalking the wily tomato: A case study in social consequences in California agricultural research. Res. Monogr. No. 15. University of California, Dept. of Applied Behavioral Sciences, Davis.
17.Gillespie, G.W. Jr., and Buttel, F.H.. 1989. Farmer ambivalence toward agricultural research: An empirical assessment. Rural Sociol. 54:382–408.
18.Hadwiger, D.F. 1982. The Politics of Agricultural Research. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
19.Hightower, J. 1973. Hard Tomatoes, Hard Times. Schenkman, Cambridge, MA.
20.Hinrichs, C.C., and Richard, T.L.. 2000. Socio-technical and Environmental Dimensions of Swine Manure Management Decisions. Final Research Project Report. Iowa State University, Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture, Ames.
22.Honeyman, M.S. 1999. Overview of swine system options. Swine System Options for Iowa: Proceedings of Conference held February 17,1999, at Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture, Ames. p. 13–20.
23.Honeyman, M.S., Brewer, C.L., Kliebenstein, J.B., Miller, D.J., Penner, A.D., Larson, M.E., and Jorgensen, C.S.. 1998. Performance and budget analysis of finishing pigs in hoop structures and confinement during the winter: First group results. ASL-R1591. ISU Swine Research Report AS-640. Iowa State University Extension, Ames. Web site http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Pages/ansci/swinereports/asl-1591.pdf (verified 17 January 2001).
24.Honeyman, M.S., and Kent, D.. 2001. Performance of a Swedish deep-bedded feeder pig production system in Iowa. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 16:50–56.
25.Kloppenburg, J.R. Jr., and Buttel, F.H.. 1987. Two blades of grass: The contradictions of agricultural research as state intervention. Res. Polit. Sociol. 3:111–135.
26.Lasley, P. 1984. The Iowa Farm and Rural Life Poll, Spring 1984 Summary. PM-1178. Iowa State University Cooperative Extension Service, Ames.
27.Lasley, P., and Bultena, G.. 1986. Farmers' opinions about third-wave technologies. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 1:122–126.
28.Lay, D.C. Jr., Haussmann, M.F., and Daniels, M.J.. 2000. Hoop housing for feeder pigs offers a welfare-friendly environment compared to a nonbedded confinement system. J. Appl. Animal Welfare Sci. 3:33–48.
29.Liebhardt, W.C. (ed.). 1993. The Dairy Debate: Consequences of Bovine Growth Hormone and Rotational Grazing Technologies. University of California Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program, Davis.
30.Lockeretz, W., and Anderson, M.D.. 1993. Agricultural Research Alternatives. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
31.Middendorf, G., and Busch, L.. 1997. Inquiry for the public good: Democratic participation in agricultural research. Agric. Human Values 14:45–57.
32.Pampel, F. Jr., and van Es., J.C. 1977. Environmental quality and issues of adoption research. Rural Sociol. 42:57–71.
33.Richard, T.L., and Choi, H.L.. 1999. Eliminating waste: Strategies for sustainable manure management—Review. Asian-Aust. J. Animal Sci. 12:1162–1169.
34.Richard, T.L., and Hinrichs, C.C.. 1998. Normal accidents: Risk management in manure handling systems. Paper no. MC98-103 presented at Mid-Central Conference of the American Society for Agricultural Engineering, 04 24–25, St. Joseph, Missouri.
35.Rogers, E.M. 1962. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press of Glencoe, New York.
36.Sommer, J.E., Hoppe, R.A., Greene, R.C., and Korb, P.J.. 1998. Structural and financial characteristics of U.S. farms, 1995: 20th annual family farm report to Congress. Agric. Info. Bull. No. 746. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC. Web site http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aib746/aib746.pdf (verified 17 January 2001).
37.USDA. 1981. A Time to Choose: Summary Report on the Structure of Agriculture. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
38.USDA. 1999. 1997 Census of Agriculture: Iowa State and County Data, Vol. 1, Geographic Area Series, Part 15. Natl. Agric. Stat. Serv. No. AC97-A-15. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC.