Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T03:45:58.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Agricultural development in Israel: Challenges and opportunities for regional collaboration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

No'am G. Seligman
Affiliation:
Research scientists, Agricultural Research Organization, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel.
Abraham Blum
Affiliation:
Research scientists, Agricultural Research Organization, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel.
Joseph Morin
Affiliation:
Research scientists, Agricultural Research Organization, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel.
Jacob Amir
Affiliation:
Research scientists, Agricultural Research Organization, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel.
Get access

Abstract

Agriculture in Israel is practiced throughout the country from the Arava Valley in the South, where average annual rainfall is less than 40 mm, to the Upper Galilee in the North, where annual rainfall exceeds 700 mm. Less than half the cultivated area used for field crops is irrigated. Much of the output is exponed, primarily to Europe, but some to the United States and Japan. In nonirrigated dry-farming areas, the main crops grown are wheat for grain and silage and several secondary crops, including sunflower, watermelons and hay legumes. Animal production is predominantly intensive dairying (mainly cows, but also sheep and goats), poultry production, and aquaculture, all of which use large quantities of imported feed grains. Beef production is largely from dairy bullocks, but includes an important rangeland beef sector. Problems that face Israeli agriculture in general and dryland agriculture in particular are primarily economic, including low prices for many traditional dryland crops, a small local market, and increasing input costs. The changing socioeconomic scene, reflected by decreasing employment in agriculture, has added to the problems of proper land use. There is an urgent need for more appropriate production systems and associated innovative research and development. This includes management for higher output/input ratios, conservation and enhancement of genetic resources, crop diversification, integration of crop and livestock production, and alternative land use options such as agroforestry, recreation, ecological refuges, and landscape enhancement. These challenges are common to most countries in the Middle East, and offer opportunities for regional and international collaboration to improve the sustainability of agriculture in the region.

Type
Selected International Papers from the U.S.-Middle East Conference on Sustainable Dryland Agriculture
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Aaronsohn, A. 1909. Contribution à l'histoire des cereales. Le ble, l'orge et le seigle à etat sauvage. (Wheat, barley and rye in the wild state.) Bulletin de Société Botanique Francaise 56:196203; 237:251258.Google Scholar
2.Alberda, Th., van Keulen, H., Seligman, N.G., and de Wit, S.T.. 1992. Food from Dry Lands—An Integrated Approach to Planning Agricultural Development. Vol. 1: System Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development. Kluwer Academic Publications, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
3.Amir, J., Krikun, J., Orion, D., Putter, J., and Klitman, S.. 1991. Wheat production in an arid environment. 1. Water use efficiency as affected by management practices. 2. Role of soil pathogens. Field Crops Research 27:351364; 365375.Google Scholar
4.Amir, J., and Ephrat, J.. 1971. A biological method for evaluating soil nitrogen availability and forecasting nitrogen fertilizer needs of wheat. Agronomy J. 63:385388.Google Scholar
5.Amir, J., and Sinclair, T.R.. 1991. A model of water limitation on spring wheat growth and yield. Field Crops Research 28:5969.Google Scholar
6.Arnon, I. 1992. Agriculture in Dry Lands. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
7.Blum, A. 1988. Plant Breeding for Stress Environments. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
8.Even-Ari, M., Shanan, L., and Tadmor, N.H.. 1971. The Negev—Challenge of a Desert. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
9.Morin, J., and Benyamini, Y.. 1988. Tillage method selections based on runoff modelling. In Challenges in Dryland Agriculture—A Global Perspective. Proc. Int. Conf. on Dryland Farming, Amarillo, Texas, pp. 251254.Google Scholar
10.Morin, J., and Sharon, D.. 1993. Rainfall intensity analysis as a tool for water resources planning. Geographical Scripts ITN (Zurich). 53:5259.Google Scholar
11.Noy-Meir, I., and Seligman, N.G.. 1979. Management of semiarid ecosystems in Israel. In Walker, B. (ed). Management of Semiarid Ecosystems. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 113160.Google Scholar
12.Rosenfeld, D., Wolff, D.B., and Atlas, D.. 1993. General probability matched relations between radar reflectivity and rain rate. J. Applied Meteorology 32:5072.Google Scholar
13.Seligman, N.G., Rosensaft, Z., Tadmor, N.H., Katzenelson, J., and Naveh, Z.. 1959. Natural Pastures in Israel. Sifriat Hapoalim, Tel Aviv, Israel. (Hebrew with English summary).Google Scholar
14.Ungar, E.D. 1990. Management of Agropastoral Systems in a Semiarid Region. Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
15.van Keulen, H., and Seligman, N.G.. 1987. Simulation of water use, nitrogen nutrition, and growth of a spring wheat crop. Simulation Monographs, Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar