Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:30:48.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to Critique of the Claim of Cannibalism at Cowboy Wash

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Patricia M. Lambert ,
Banks L. Leonard ,
Brian R. Billman ,
Richard A. Marlar ,
Margaret E. Newman  and
Karl J. Reinhard
Patricia M. Lambert
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Social Work, and Anthropology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-0730
Banks L. Leonard
Affiliation:
Soil Systems Inc, 1121 North 2nd St, Phoenix, AZ 85004
Brian R. Billman
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3115
Richard A. Marlar
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO 80220
Margaret E. Newman
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
Karl J. Reinhard
Affiliation:
School of Natural Resource Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln NE 68588-0368
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The original authors of Billman et al. (2000) are joined by three other analysts from the Cowboy Wash research team to respond to the critique of this article by Dongoske et al. (2000). Dongoske and his coauthors state that Billman et al. (2000) failed to test alternative hypotheses or to consider alternative explanations for the findings at 5MT10010 and similar sites. The original authors point out that alternative hypotheses were examined and rejected, leaving a violent episode of cannibalism as the most plausible explanation for the remains found at 5MT10010. Dongoske et al. also question many aspects of the osteological, archaeological, coprolite, and biochemical analyses that were presented in the 5MT10010 study. Our response addresses issues of data collection, procedure, and interpretation, and attempts to clarify some points that were not fully developed in the original text due to length restrictions.

Resumen

Resumen

Los autores de Billman et al. (2000) se onen a tres de los analistas que participaron en las investigaciones de Cowboy Wash para responder a la critica del artículo por Dongoske et al. (2000). Dongoske et al. declaran que Billman et al. no evaluaron hipótesis alternativas, o consideraron otras explicaciones respecto a los descubrimientos de 5MT10010yde sitios semejantes. Los autores originales responden que hipótesis alternativas para explicar los hallazgos de 5MT10010 fueron examinadas y rechazadas, dejando así un episodio violento de canibalismo como la única explicación posible. Además, Dongoske et al. cuestionan varios aspectos de los análisis osteológicos, arqueológicos, coprológicos, y bioquímicos que fueron presentados en el estudio de 5MT10010. Nuestra respuesta se dirige a preguntas sobre de los datos, procedimientos e interpretaciones, mientras trata de clarificar ciertos puntos que no fueron completamente elaborados en el texto original debido a limitaciones de espacio.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , April 2000 , pp. 397 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Billman, B. R., Lambert, P. M., and Leonard, B. L. 2000 Cannibalism, Warfare, and Drought in the Mesa Verde Region during the Twelfth Century A.D. American Antiquity 65 : 145–178.Google Scholar
Bonnichsen, R., and Will, R. 1990 Cultural Modification of Bone : The Experimental Approach in Faunal Analysis. In Mammalian Osteology, edited by Gilbert, B. M., pp. 7–30. Missouri Archaeological Society, Columbia.Google Scholar
Carniero, R. L. 1990 Chiefdom-level Warfare as Exemplified in Fiji and the Cauca Valley. In The Anthropology ofWar, edited by Haas, J., pp. 190–211. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dongoske, K. E., Martin, D. L., and Ferguson, T. J. 2000 Critique of the Claim of Cannibalism at Cowboy Wash. American Antiquity 65 : 179–190.Google Scholar
Eisele, J. A. 1994 Survival and Detection of Blood Residue Analysis on Stone Tools. Technical Report 94-1. Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar
Eisele, J. A., Fowler, D. D., Haynes, G., and Lewis, R. A. 1995 Survival and Detection of Blood Residue Analysis on Stone Tools. Antiquity 69 : 36–46.Google Scholar
Hammond, W., and Rathbun, F. 1998 Preliminary Report of the 1998 Excavations at the Swallow Site (5JF321). Colorado Archaeological Society, Denver.Google Scholar
Kleidon, J. 2000 5MT9541 : A Late Pueblo III Habitation Site. In The Puebloan Occupation of the Ute Mountain Piedmont : Late Pueblo II-Early Pueblo III, Early Pueblo III, and Late Pueblo III Habitation Sites, edited by Billman, B. R.. Publications in Archaeology No. 22, Vol. 3. Soil Systems Inc., Phoenix. In press.Google Scholar
Lambert, P. M. 1999 Human Skeletal Remains. In The Puebloan Occupation of the Ute Mountain Piedmont : Environmental and Bioarchaeological Studies, edited by Billman, B. R., pp. 111–161. Publications in Archaeology No. 22, Vol. 5. Soil Systems Inc., Phoenix.Google Scholar
Lambert, P. M. 2000 Violent Injury and Death in a Pueblo H-III Sample from the Southern Piedmont of Sleeping Ute Mountain, Colorado. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Supplement 30 : 205.Google Scholar
Lambert, P. M., Billman, B. R., and Leonard, B. L. 2000 Explaining Variability in Mutilated Human Bone Assemblages from the American Southwest : A Case Study from the Southern Piedmont of Sleeping Ute Mountain, Colorado. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 10 : 49–64.Google Scholar
Leonard, B. L., McAndrews, K., and Lambert, P. M. 2000 5MT10010. In The Puebloan Occupation of the Ute Mountain Piedmont : Late Pueblo II-Early Pueblo III, Early Pueblo III, and Late Pueblo III Habitations Sites, edited by Billman, B. R.. Publications in Archaeology No. 22, Vol. 3. Soil Systems Inc., Phoenix. In press.Google Scholar
Loy, T. H., and Dixon, E. J. 1998 Blood Residue on Fluted Points from Eastern Beringia. American Antiquity 63 : 21–6.Google Scholar
Marlar, R. 1998 Letter Report Summarizing the Results of Human Myoglobin ELISA Testing of a Human Coprolite and Artifacts from 5MT10010, Southwestern Colorado. Manuscript on file, Soil Systems Inc., Phoenix.Google Scholar
Marlar, R., Scott-Cummings, L., and Puseman, K. 1995 Protein Residue Analysis of Archaeological Materials : Comments on Criticisms and Methods. Southwestern Lore 61(2) : 27–37.Google Scholar
Marlar, R., Kerklo, M., and Marlar, J. E. 1999 Report on Protein Residue Analysis from Sites on the Trans Colorado Pipeline. Report submitted to Centennial MarlarGoogle Scholar
Leonard, B. L., Billman, B. R., Lambert, P. M., and Marlar, I. E. 2000 Biochemical Evidence of Cannibalism at a Prehistoric Puebloan Site in Southwestern Colorado. Manuscript on file, Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver.Google Scholar
Minnis, P. E. 1989 Prehistoric Diet in the Southwest : Macroplant Remains from Four Corner's Feces. American Antiquity 54 : 543–563.Google Scholar
Newman, M. E. 1989 The Identification of Protein Residues on Lithic Artifacts from a Stratified Boreal Forest Site. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 13 : 119–132.Google Scholar
Newman, M. E. 2000 Immunological Analysis of Lithic Artifacts from 5MT10010. In The Puebloan Occupation of the Ute Mountain Piedmont : Late Pueblo H-Early Pueblo III, Early Pueblo III, and Late Pueblo III Habitation Sites, edited by Billman, B. R.). Publications in Archaeology, No. 22, Vol. 3. Soil Systems Inc., Phoenix. In press.Google Scholar
Newman, M. E., Ceri, H., and Kooyman, B. 1996 The Use of Immunological Techniques in the Analysis of Archaeological Materials—A Response to Eisele; With Report of Studies at Head-Smashed-In Buffalo Jump. Antiquity 10 : 611'–682.Google Scholar
Nordby, L. V. 1974 Excavation of Sites 5MTUMR-2343, -2345, and -2346, Mancos Canyon, Ute Homelands, Colorado. Report submitted to the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Contract No. MOOC14201337.Google Scholar
Reinhard, K. J. 1992 The Impact ofDiet and Parasitism onAnemia in the Prehistoric West. In Diet, Demography and Disease : Changing Perspectives of Anemia, edited by Stuart-McAdam, P. and Kent, S., pp. 219–258. Aldine deGruyter, New York.Google Scholar
Reinhard, K. J. 2000 Results of Analysis of a Human Coprolite from 5MT10010, Southwestern Colorado. In The Puebloan Occupation of the Ute Mountain Piedmont : Late Pueblo II-Early Pueblo III, Early Pueblo III, and Late Pueblo III Habitation Sites, edited by Billman, B. R.. Publications in Archaeology, No. 22, Vol. 3. Soil Systems Inc., Phoenix. In press.Google Scholar
Reinhard, K. J., and Bryant, V. M. 1992 Coprolite Analysis : A Biological Perspective on Archaeology. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 4, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 245–288. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Sutton, M. Q., and Reinhard, K. J. 1995 Cluster Analysis of the Coprolites fromAntelope House : Implications for Anasazi Diet and Cuisine. Journal ofArcheological Science 22 : 741–750.Google Scholar
Turner, C. G. II, and Turner, J. A. 1999 Man Corn : Cannibalism and Violence in the Prehistoric American Southwest. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Ubelaker, D. H. 1984 Human Skeletal Remains. Rev. ed. Taraxacum, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Vaughn, T A. 1978 Mammology. Saunders College, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
White, T. D. 1992 Prehistoric Cannibalism at Mancos 5MTUMR-2346. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar