Skip to main content Accessibility help

Methodological Issues in the Study of Assemblage Diversity

  • M. J. Baxter (a1)


Three approaches that have been used to investigate assemblage diversity in the archaeological literature-two established and one new-are studied, with a particular emphasis on assemblage richness. It is argued that the established regression and simulation approaches, as often used, are only strictly valid if they assume what they are supposed to test-namely that assemblages are sampled from populations with the same richness or structure. Rarefaction methodology provides an alternative to the simulation approach and suggests that even if the latter is used, sampling without rather than with replacement is preferable. Some potential limitations of a recently proposed approach using jackknife methods are noted, and it is suggested that bootstrapping may be a more natural resampling method to use.


El objetivo de este artículo es el estudio de tres métodos que han sido utilizados en la literatura arqueológica para investigar la diversidad del conjunto con especial atención a su riqueza. Se discute que los métodos de regresión y simulatión, ya bien establecidos, son sólo estrictamente válidos si asumen que el muestreo se realiza sobre poblaciones con la misma riqueza o estructura. El método de rarefaction, más novedoso que los anteriores, proporciona una alternativa al de simulación y sugiere que, incluso si este último es utilizado, un muestreo sin substitutión es preferible a un muestreo con substitutión. Algunas de las limitaciones del método de jackknife, propuesto recientemente, son puestas de manifiesto, y se sugiere que el bootstrapping puede ser un mejor metodo.



Hide All
Aldenderfer, M. 1998 Quantitative Methods in Archaeology: A Review of Recent Trends and Developments. Journal of Archaeological Research 6: 91120.
Baxter, M. J. 2000 Non-linear Models of Assemblage Richness: A Technical Note. Research Report 28/00, Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Operational Research, Nottingham Trent University, U.K.
Birks, H. J. B., and Line, J. M. 1992 The Use of Rarefaction Analysis for Estimating Palynological Richness from Quaternary Pollen-Analytical Data. Holocene 2: 110.
Bobrowsky, P. T., and Ball, B. F. 1989 The Theory and Mechanics of Ecological Diversity in Archaeology. In Quantifying Diversity in Archaeology. edited by Leonard, R. D. and Jones, G.T. pp. 412. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Byrd, J. E. 1997 The Analysis of Diversity in Archaeological Faunal Assemblages: Complexity and Subsistence Strategies in the Southeast During the Middle Woodland Period. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 16: 4972.
Conkey, M. W. 1980 The Identification of Prehistoric Aggregation Sites: The Case for Altamira. Current Anthropology 21: 609630.
Cowgill, G. L. 1989 The Concept of Diversity in Archaeological Theory. In Quantifying Diversity in Archaeology, edited by Leonard, R. D. and Jones, G.T. pp. 131141. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Davison, A. C, and Hinkley, D. V. 1997 Bootstrap Methods and their Application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dunnell, R. C. 1989 Diversity in Archaeology: A Group of Measures in Search of Application? In Quantifying Diversity in Archaeology, edited by Leonard, R. D. and Jones, G.T. pp. 142149. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dye, T. S., and Tuggle, H. D. 2001 Land Snail Extinctions at Kalaeloa, O’ahu. Internet Archaeology 10. Date accessed.
Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. J. 1993 An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, London.
Grayson, D. K. 1984 Quantitative Zooarchaeology. Academic Press, New York.
Grayson, D. K., and Cole, S. C. 1998 Stone Tool Assemblage Richness During the Middle and Early Upper Palaeolithic in France. Journal of Archaeological Science 25: 927938.
Jones, G. T, Grayson, D. K., and Beck, C. 1983 Artifact Class Richness and Sample Size in Archaeological Surface Assemblages. In Lulu Linear Punctuated: Essays in Honour of George Irving Quimby, edited by Dunnell, R. C. and Grayson, D.K. pp. 5573. Anthropological Papers 72, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Kaufman, D. 1998 Measuring Archaeological Diversity: An Application of the Jackknife Technique. American Antiquity 63: 7385.
Kintigh, K. W. 1984 Measuring Archaeological Diversity by Comparison with Simulated Assemblages. American Antiquity 49: 4454.
Kintigh, K. W. 1989 Sample Size, Significance and Measures of Diversity. In Quantifying Diversity in Archaeology, edited by Leonard, R. D. and Jones, G.T. pp. 2536. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Leonard, R. D. 1997 The Sample Size-Richness Relation: A Comment. American Antiquity 62: 713716.
Leonard, R. D., and Jones, G. T. (editors) 1989 Quantifying Diversity in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
McCartney, P. H., and Glass, M. G. 1990 Simulation Models and the Interpretation of Archaeological Diversity. American Antiquity 55: 521536.
Neiman, F. D. 1995 Stylistic Variation in Evolutionary Perspective: Inferences from Decorative Diversity and Interassemblage Distance in Illinois Woodland Ceramic Assemblages. American Antiquity 60: 736.
Orton, C. 2000 Sampling in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Plog, S., and Hegmon, M. 1993 The Sample Size-Richness Relation: The Relevance of Research Questions, Sampling Strategies and Behavioral Variation. American Antiquity 58: 489496.
Potter, J. M. 1997 Communal Ritual and Faunal Remains: An Example from the Dolores Anasazi. Journal of Field Archaeology 24: 353364.
Rhode, D. 1988 Measurement of Archaeological Diversity and the Sample- Size Effect. American Antiquity 53: 708716.
Ringrose, T. J. 1993 Diversity Indices and Archaeology. In Computing the Past: CAA92, edited by Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I., pp. 279385. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus.
Shott, M. J. 1997 Activity and Formation as Sources of Variation in Great Lakes Paleoindian Assemblages. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 22: 197236.
Smith, W., and Grassle, J. F. 1977 Sampling Properties of a Family of Diversity Measures. Biometrics 33: 288292.
Thomas, D. H. 1989 Diversity in Hunter-Gatherer Cultural Geography. In Quantifying Diversity in Archaeology, edited by Leonard, R. D. and Jones, G.T. pp. 8591. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Venables, W. N., and Ripley, B. D. 1999 Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS: Third edition. New York: Springer.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Methodological Issues in the Study of Assemblage Diversity

  • M. J. Baxter (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.