Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:25:18.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

LiDAR for Archaeological Landscape Analysis: A Case Study of Two Eighteenth-Century Maryland Plantation Sites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

James M. Harmon
Affiliation:
National Park Service, Northeast Region Archeology Program, 15 State Street Boston, Massachusetts02109 (Jim_Harmon@nps.gov)
Mark P. Leone
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742 (mleone@anth.umd.edu)
Stephen D. Prince
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland20742 (sprince@geog.umd.edu)
Marcia Snyder
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland20742 (sprince@geog.umd.edu)

Abstract

Topographic and image maps of archaeological landscapes can be made using airborne LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) data. Such maps contain more three-dimensional data than conventional maps and may be more spatially accurate. In addition to providing a record of topography, LiDAR images may reveal surface indications of archaeological deposits unnoticed when using more conventional discovery techniques. LiDAR data and derived imagery need to be integrated with existing forms of archaeological data for their full potential to be realized.

Résumé

Résumé

Mapas topográficos y de imagenes de paisajes arqueológicos pueden ser hechos utilizando los datos de LiDAR (Sistema para detectar la distancia del radio de luz). Tales mapas contienen datos más tridimensionales que los mapas convencionales y pueden ser espacialmente más exactos. Además de proporcionar un registro de la topografia, las imágenes LiDAR pueden revelar indicaciones de depósitos arqueológicos en la superficie que pasan desapercibidos cuando se usa las técnicas convencionales de descubrimiento. Los datos LiDAR y las imágenes derivadas necesitan ser integrados con formatos existentes de datos arqueológicos para darse cuenta de su potencial total.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Ackermann, Fritz 1999 Airborne Laser Scanning-Present Status and Future Expectations. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 54(2–3):6467.Google Scholar
Bescherer (Metheny), Karen, and Yentsch, Anne 1989 Initial Archaeological Testing at Wye House, Wye Island, Maryland. Report to Historic Annapolis, Annapolis, MD. Manuscript on file, University of Maryland, Archaeology in Annapolis Laboratory, College Park.Google Scholar
Bewley, R. H., Crutchley, S. P., and Shell, C. A. 2005 New Light on an Ancient Landscape: Lidar Survey in the Stonehenge World Heritage Site. Antiquity 79:636647.Google Scholar
Bewley, R. H., and Raczkowski, W. 2002 Aerial Archaeology. Developing Future Practice. Nato Series 1:vol. 337.Google Scholar
deMoulins, Dominique, and Weir, David A. 1997 The Potential and Use of Environmental Techniques in Gardens. Journal of Garden History 17(1):4046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deveruex, B. J., Amble, G. S., Crow, P., and Cliff, A. D. 2005 The Potential of Airborne Lidar for Detection of Archaeological Features under Woodland Canopies. Antiquity 70:648660.Google Scholar
Dézallier d’Argenville, Antoine-Joseph 1728 [1712] Theory and Practice of Gardening …. By le sieur Alexander Le Blond [Dézallier d’Argenville]. Translated by John James. Bernard Lintot, London.Google Scholar
Ernstein, Julie H. 2003 Constructing Context: Historical Archaeology and the Pleasure Garden in Prince George’s County. Maryland, 1740–1790. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Everson, Paul, and Williamson, Tom (editors) 1998 The Archaeology of Landscape: Studies Presented to Christopher Taylor. Manchester University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Garrison, J. Ritchie 1991 Landscape and Material Life in Franklin County, Massachusetts, 1770–1860. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar
Harmon, James M., Hill, Anna, Beadenkopf, Kristofer, Neuwirth, Jessica, Leone, Mark P., and Russo, Jean 2003 Archaeological Investigations at Wye Hall Plantation. Wye Island, Queen Anne’s County, Maryland. On file: University of Maryland, Archaeology in Annapolis Laboratory, College Park.Google Scholar
Jacques, David 1997 The Progress of Garden Archaeology. Journal of Garden History 17(1):310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelso, William M., and Most, Rachel (editors) 1990 Earth Patterns: Essays in Landscape Archaeology. University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville.Google Scholar
Kvamme, Kenneth L. 2003 Geophysical Survey as Landscape Archaeology. American Antiquity 68:435458 Google Scholar
Langley, Batty 1728 New Principles of Gardening. A. Bettesworth and J. Batley, London.Google Scholar
Leone, Mark P. 1984 Interpreting Ideology in Historical Archaeology: Using the Rules of Perspective in the William Paca Garden in Annapolis, Maryland. In Ideology, Power, and Prehistory, edited by Daniel Miller and Christopher Tilley, pp. 2535. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Leone, Mark P., Harmon, James H., and Neuwirth, Jessica L. 2005 Perspective and Surveillance in Eighteenth Century Maryland Gardens, Including William Pace’s Garden on Wye Island. Historical Archaeology 39(4): 131150.Google Scholar
Leone, Mark P., and Hurry, Silas D. 1997 Seeing: The Power of Town Planning in the Chesapeake. Historical Archaeology 32(4):3462.Google Scholar
Leone, Mark P., and Shackel, Paul A. 1990 Plane and Solid Geometry in Colonial Gardens in Annapolis, Maryland. In Earth Patterns: Essays in Landscape Archaeology, edited by WilliamM. Kelso and Rachel Most, pp. 153167. University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville.Google Scholar
Lockwood, Alice G. B. 1931 Garden of Colony State: Gardens and Gardeners of the American Colonies and of the Republic Before 1840. Vol. 1: Introduction, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Ohio, Illinois, Fences and Enclosures. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Lockwood, Alice G. B. 1934 Gardens of Colony and State: Gardens and Gardeners of the American Colonies and of the Republic Before 1840. Vol. 2: Introduction, Virginia, the City of Washington, Maryland, Delaware, South Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia, Kentucky, Tennessee, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Texas, California, Fences and Enclosures. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Martin, Peter 1990 The Pleasure Gardens of Virginia: From Jamestown to Jefferson. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Miller, Philip 1731 The Gardener’s Dictionary. Philip Miller, London.Google Scholar
Miller, Philip 1755 Figures of the Most Beautiful, Useful, and Uncommon Plants Described in the Gardeners Dictionary. Philip Miller, London.Google Scholar
Mukerji, Chandra 1997 Territorial Ambitions and the Gardens of Versailles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
O’Dio, Luke 1802 Letter to Thomas Jefferson, June 23. Thomas Jefferson Correspondence Collection. Special Collection Division, National Agricultural Library, Beltsville, Maryland. nat.usda.gov/speccol/ Google Scholar
Paca-Steele, Barbara, and Wright, St. Clair 1986 Mathematics of an Eighteenth-Century Wilderness Garden. Journal of Garden History 6(4):299320.Google Scholar
Tilley, Christopher 1994 A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths, and Monuments. Berg, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wagstaff, J. M., editor 1987 Landscape and Culture: Geographical and Archaeological Perspectives. Basil Blackwell Press, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Williamson, Tom 1995 Polite Landscapes: Gardens and Society in Eighteenth-Century England. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Yamin, Rebecca, and Metheny, Karen Bescherer (editors) 1995 Landscape Archaeology: Reading and Interpreting the American Historical Landscape. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar