Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T06:17:53.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Brood Hen of Faction: Mrs. Macaulay and Radical Politics, 1765-1775*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

Barbara Brandon Schnorrenberg
Get access

Extract

The middle years of the eighteenth century in England were on the whole a period when few women made any impact on the public scene. Writing gradually became a respectable way for a woman to earn a living, but women writers generally confined their efforts to the novel, belle lettres, or instructional works. The most important exception was Catherine Sawbridge Macaulay. She began to publish first as an historian and then turned to topical political pamphleteering.

Descended on both sides from Whiggish City businessmen, Catherine Sawbridge of Olantigh, Kent, married in 1760 George Macaulay. He was a Scots born physician who had wide connections in London, both among Scots and medical men, and among political radicals and non-conformists. Perhaps the most important intimate of the Macaulay circle was Thomas Hollis, a well-to-do republican barrister, bibliophile, and collector of objects of vertu. Other radical friends included several dissenting ministers, among them Caleb Fleming, Theophilus Lindsey, Richard Baron, and Richard Price, and several writers on historical and political subjects, including William Harris, Adam Ferguson, and James Burgh. Catherine's brother, John Sawbridge, was active in City politics, where he had connections both by inheritance and marriage. Thus the Macaulay household offered a meeting place for both theorists and active politicians.

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , Spring 1979 , pp. 33 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Historical Association, Washington, D.C., November, 1975.

References

1 See Halsband, Robert, “‘The Female Pen,’ Women and Literature in Eighteenth Century England,” History Today, 24 (1974): 702–709.Google Scholar

2 For a fuller account of Mrs. Macaulay's life, see Donnelly, L.M., “The Celebrated Mrs. Macaulay,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd Ser., 6 (1949): 173–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Beckwith, Mildred Chaffee, “Catherine Macaulay, Eighteenth-Century Rebel” (Ph.D. diss. Ohio State University, 1953)Google Scholar. Fox, Claire Oilbride, “Catherine Macaulay, An Eighteenth Century Clio,” Winttrthur Portfolio, 4 (1968): 129–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Withey, Lynne E., “Catherine Macaulay and the Uses of History: Ancient Rights, Perfectionism, and Propaganda,” Journal of British Studies, 16 (1976–1977): 59–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar, discusses primarily the relationship of Macaulay's political and religious beliefs.

3 On Hollis, see Robins, Caroline, “The Strenuous Whig, Thomas Hollis of Lincoln's Inn,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd Ser., 7 (1950): 406–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Conner, George W., ed., The Autobiography of Benjamin Rush (Princeton: 1948), p. 60Google Scholar. Butterfield, L.H., “The American Interests of the Firm of E. and C. Duly, with their Letters to Benjamin Rush, 1770-1795,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 45 (1951): 283–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Hardy, Basil Cozens, ed., The Diary of Sylas Neville 1767-1788 (London, 1950)Google Scholar, passim. Thomas Hollis, Manuscript Diary, passim. (The original MS diary is in the Houghton Library at Harvard University. I consulted a typescript made from a microfilm at the Institute of Early American History and Culture, Williamsburg, Va.) Ditchfield, C.M., “Some Literary and Political Views of Catherine Macaulay,” American Notes and Queries, 12 (Jan. 1974): 70–75.Google Scholar

5 Blackburne, F., ed. Memoirs of Thomas Hollis, Esq., 2 vols. (London: 1780), I: 210.Google Scholar

6 W.J. Temple to James Boswell, London, 23 Nov. 1763. Pottle, Frederick A., ed., Boswell in Holland 1763-1764 (New York, 1952), p. 79.Google Scholar

7 H. Walpole to William Mason, London, 29 December 1763. Walpole, Horace, Correspondence, ed. Lewis, W.S., et al. (New Haven, 1955), 28:3.Google Scholar

8 Pottle, , Boswell in Holland, pp. 79, 83.Google Scholar

9 Ramsay to Hume, 8 Nov. 1763. Burton, J.H., ed., Letters of Eminent Persons addressed to David Hume (Edinburgh, 1869), pp. 29–30.Google Scholar

10 Gausssen, Alice C.C., A Later Pepys, 2 vols. (London, 1904) I:207, 210.Google Scholar

11 Hollis MS diary, passim.

12 Neville, , Diary, p. 64Google Scholar. Hollis MS diary, 5:209. Belsham, Thomas, Memoirs of the late Reverend Theophitus Lindsey (2nd ed; London, 1820), p. 391.Google Scholar

13 (London, 1767). (Hereafter Loose Remarks.)

14 Butterfield, L.H., ed., Letters of Benjamin Rush, 2 vols. (Prnceton, 1951), I:70–71Google Scholar. Hollis MS diary, IV: 260.

15 Loose Remarks, pp. 5-7, 11-27.

16 Ibid., p. 29.

17 Ibid., pp. 31-36.

18 Ibid., pp. 33, 36-37.

19 Ibid., p. 38.

20 Rush, , Utters, I: 70–71.Google Scholar

21 On Paoli and the Corsican revolt see Thrasher, Peter Adam, Pasquale Paoli: An Enlightened Hero 1725-1807 (Hamden, Conn., 1970)Google Scholar; Carrington, Dorothy, “The Corsican Constitution of Pasquale Paoli (1755-1769),” English Historical Review, 87 (1973): 481–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22 Walpole to Mann, 13 Oct. 1769. Walpole, , Correspondence, 22:145Google Scholar. See also, same to same, 6 Nov. 1769, p. 150. Same to Mrs. Robert Cholmondeley, 15 Oct. 1769. 36: 55-56. Lord Lyttleton to Mrs. Montagu, 10 Ort. 1769. Blunt, Reginald, ed., Mrs. Montagu “Queen of the Blues,” 2 vols. (Boston, 1923), I:230Google Scholar. Walpole, Horace, Memoirs of the Reign of King George the Third, edited by SirMarchant, Denis Le, 4 vols. (New York, 1894), 3:257–258.Google Scholar

23 Rudé, George, Wilkes and Liberty (Oxford, 1962)Google Scholar; Brewer, John, Party Ideology and Popular Politics at the Accession of George III (Cambridge, 1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Christie, Ian R., Wilkes, Wyvill, and Reform: The Parliamentary Reform Movement in British Politics 1760-1785 (London, 1962).Google Scholar

24 Macoby, S., English Radicalism 1762-1785 (London, 1955), pp. 94–184Google Scholar. Cone, Carl B., The English Jacobins (New York, 1968), pp. 43–47Google Scholar. Rudé, George, Hanoverian London 1714-1808 (London, 1971), pp. 162–173Google Scholar. George Thomas Earl of Albermarle, Memoirs of the Marquis of Rockingham and his Contemporaries, 2 vols. (London, 1852), 2: 96. Walpole, , Memoirs of George III, 3:191-192, 220Google Scholar. Norris, John, Shelburne and Reform (London, 1963), pp. 58–74Google Scholar. Robbins, Caroline, The Eighteenth Century Commonwealthman (New York, 1968), p. 358Google Scholar. Sutherland, Lucy S., The City of London and the Opposition to Government 1768-1774 (London, 1959)Google Scholar. See also the works cited in note 23.

25 Foote, Samuel, The Devil upon Two Sticks (London, 1778)Google Scholar. H. Walpole to H. Seymour Conway, 16 June 1768. Walpole, , Correspondence, 39:102.Google Scholar

26 H. Walpole to E. Walpole, 28 April 1769. Walpole, , Correspondence, 36:52.Google Scholar

27 H. Walpole to Lady Ossory, 5 Dec. 1769. Walpole, , Correspondence, 32:40.Google Scholar

28 Butterfield, , Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 45 (1951): 283–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29 Lindsey, , Memoirs, p. 391Google Scholar. Hollis MS diary, 5:75. Wilkes to daughter, 11 May 1770. The Correspondence of the late John Wilkes with his Friends, 5 vols. (London, 1805), 4: 31–32.Google Scholar

30 Rush, Autobiography, pp. 60–61Google Scholar. Ditchfield, , American Notes and Queries, 12 (Jan. 1974): 70–75.Google Scholar D. Hume to W. Robertson, 28 March 1769, in Greig, J.T.T., ed., The Letters of David Hume, 2 vols. (Oxford, 1932), 2: 199.Google Scholar

31 Lyttleton to E. Montagu, 21 June 1770. Blunt, , Mrs. Montagu, 1: 234.Google Scholar

32 In The Works of Edmund Burke, 8 vols. (Boston, 1826–1827), 1: 352–531.Google Scholar

33 Ibid., pp. 379-380.

34 Ibid., p. 405.

35 Ibid., p. 416.

36 Cone, Carl B., Burke and the Nature of Politics: The Age of the American Revolution (Lexington, Ky., 1957), pp. 195–209Google Scholar. Boulton, James T., The Language of Politics in the Age of Wilkes and Burke (London, 1963), pp. 52–72Google Scholar. Brewer, John, “Party and the Double Cabinet: Two Facets of Burke's Thoughts,” Historical Journal, 14 (1971): 479–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Willis, Richard E., “Some Further Reflections on Burke's Discontents,” Studies in Burke and His Time, 11 (1969–1970): 1417–1427Google Scholar. Robbins, Caroline, “Edmund Burke's Rationale of Cabinet Government,” Burke Newsletter, 7 (1965): 457–465Google Scholar. Pocock, J.G.A., “Burke and the Ancient Constitution—A Problem in the History of Ideas,” Historical Journal, 3(1960): 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37 Observations, pp. 6-7.

38 Ibid., pp. 14-15.

39 Ibid., pp. 28, 31.

40 Burke, to O'Hara, , 21 May 1770, in The Correspondence of Edmund Burke (Cambridge and Chicago: 1958-), 2:139–140.Google Scholar

41 Burke to Shackleford, n.d. Ibid., 149-150.

42 Walpole, , Memoirs of George III, 4: 86–87Google Scholar. Walpole to Mann, 6 May 1770. Walpole, , Correspondence, 22: 208–209.Google Scholar

43 Butterfield, , Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 45 (1951): 287–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

44 The Gentleman's Magazine, (May 1770): 222–223.Google Scholar

45 Guttridge, G.H., English Whiggism and the American Revolution (Berkeley, 1966), pp. 44–45Google Scholar. Pole, J.R., Political Representation in England and the Origins of the American Revolution (London, 1966), pp. 429–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Christie, , Wilkes, Wyvill, and Reform, pp. 40–43Google Scholar. Lecky, W.E.H., A History of England in the Eighteenth Century, 8 vols. (New York, 1879–1890), 3: 224.Google Scholar

46 Burgh, James, Political Disquisitions, 3 vols. (London: 1774–1775), 1: 169–173Google Scholar. Cone, , English Jacobins, pp. 48–49Google Scholar. Christie, , Wilkes, Wyvill, and Reform, pp. 53–55Google Scholar. Oscar, and Handlin, Mary, “James Burgh and American Revolutionary Theory,” Proceedings of the Massachusetts Historical Society, 73 (1961): 38–57Google Scholar. Bonwick, Colin, English Radicals and the American Revolution (Chapel Hill, 1977).Google Scholar

47 Hollis MS diary, 6: 15.

48 Christie, , Wilkes, Wyvill, and Reform, pp. 60–62Google Scholar. Christie, Ian R., “The Wilkites and the General Election of 1774,” in Myth and Reality in Late-Eighteenth-Century British Politics (Berkeley, 1970), pp. 244–260.Google Scholar

49 Reprinted in Smith, Paul H., English Defenders of American Freedoms 1774-1778 (Washington, 1972), pp. 107–123.Google Scholar

50 Ibid., pp. 5-6.

51 Ibid., p. 15.

52 Toplady, Augustus M., Works, 6 vols. (London, 1825), 6: 254.Google Scholar

53 Smith, English Defenders; Bonwick, English Radicals: Colbourn, H. Trevor, The Lamp of Experience: Whig History and the Intellectual Origins of the American Revolution (Chapel Hill, 1965)Google Scholar: Colbourn, H. Trevor, “Thomas Jefferson's Use of the Past,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd. ser., 15 (1958): 56–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

54 Robbins, Eighteenth Century Commonwealthman; Bonwick, English Radicals; Peters, Marie, “The ‘Monitor’ on the Constitution 1755-1765: New Lights on the Ideological Origins of English Radicalism,” English Historical Review, 86 (1971): 706–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pocock, J.G.A., “Machiavelli, Harrington, and English Political Ideologies in the Eighteenth Century,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd ser., 22 (1965): 549–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

55 Observations on the Reflections of the Right Hon. Edmund Burke, on the Revolution in France (London, 1790).Google Scholar

56 Tinker, Chauncey Brewster, The Salon and English Letters (New York, 1915)Google Scholar; Lockitt, C.H., The Relations of French and English Society (1763-1793) (London, 1920)Google Scholar; Scott, Walter S., The Bluestocking Ladies (London, 1947).Google Scholar