Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Computer-aided design versus sketching: An exploratory case study

  • David Veisz (a1), Essam Z. Namouz (a1), Shraddha Joshi (a1) and Joshua D Summers (a1)

Abstract

This paper presents a preliminary comparison between the role of computer-aided design (CAD) and sketching in engineering through a case study of a senior design project and interviews with industry and academia. The design team consisted of four senior level mechanical engineering students each with less than 1 year of professional experience are observed while completing an industry sponsored mechanical engineering capstone design project across a 17 week semester. Factors investigated include what CAD tools are used, when in the design process they are implemented, the justification for their use from the students' perspectives, the actual knowledge gained from their use, the impact on the final designed artifact, and the contributions of any sketches generated. At each design step, comparisons are made between CAD and sketching. The students implemented CAD tools at the onset of the project, generally failing to realize gains in design efficiency or effectiveness in the early conceptual phases of the design process. As the design became more concrete, the team was able to recognize clear gains in both efficiency and effectiveness through the use of computer assisted design programs. This study is augmented by interviews with novice and experienced industry users and academic instructors to align the trends observed in the case study with industry practice and educational emphasis. A disconnect in the perceived capability of CAD tools was found between novice and experienced user groups. Opinions on the importance of sketching skills differed between novice educators and novice industry professionals, suggesting that there is a change of opinion as to the importance of sketching formed when recent graduates transition from academia to industry. The results suggest that there is a need to emphasize the importance of sketching and a deeper understanding as to the true utility of CAD tools at each stage of the design process.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Reprint requests to: Joshua D. Summers, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University, 250 Fluor Daniel Building, Clemson, SC 29634-0921, USA. E-mail: jsummer@clemson.edu

References

Hide All
Ahmed, S. (1999). The relationships between data, information and knowledge based on a preliminary study of engineering designers. ASME Design Theory and Methodology, Las Vegas, NV.
Ahmed, S. (2007). An industrial case study: identification of competencies of design engineers. Journal of Mechanical Design 129(7), 709.
Baird, F. (2000). An ethnographic study of engineering design teams at Rolls-Royce Aerospace. Design Studies 21(4), 333.
Ball, L. (2000). Applying ethnography in the analysis and support of expertise in engineering design. Design Studies 21(4), 403.
Breslin, M. (2008, January). On the case study method of research. Design Issues 24(1), 36.
Chester, I. (2007, 01). Teaching for CAD expertise. Journal of Technology and Design Education 17(1), 2335.
Demian, P. (2006, April). An ethnographic study of design knowledge reuse in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry. Research in Engineering Design 16(4), 184.
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14(4), 532550.
Field, A.D. (2003). Education and training for CAD in the auto industry. Computer Aided Design 36(14), 14311437.
Green, G. (2002). Management of multi-method engineering design research: a case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 19(2), 131.
Joshi, S., & Summers, J. (2010). Investigating information loss in collaborative design: a case study with Capstone Design Project. National Capstone Conf. 2010, Boulder, CO.
Lawson, B. (2001). CAD and creativity: does the computer really help? Leonardo 35(3), 327331.
Lawson, B. (2002). CAD and creativity: does the computer really help? Leonardo 35(3), 327331.
Macomber, B., & Yang, M. (2011). The role of sketch finish and style in user responses to early stage design concepts. Proc. 2011 ASME Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf., Washington, DC.
Maier, J.R., Troy, T., Johnston, J., Bobba, V., & Summers, J.D. (2010, November). Case study research using senior design projects: an example application. Journal of Mechanical Design 132(11).
Morkos, B., & Summers, J. (2010). Implementing design tools in Capstone Design Projects: requirements elicitation through the use of personas. National Capstone Conf. 2010, Boulder, CO.
Mortenson, M. E. (1997). Geometric Modelling (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
O'Donnell, F. J. (2005). Design Performance. New York: Springer–Verlag.
Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1995). Engineering Design—A Systematic Approach. London: Springer–Verlag.
Powers, L., & Summers, J. (2009). Integrating graduate design coaches in undergraduate design project teams. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education 37(1), 320.
Robertson, B.F., & Radcliffe, D.F. (2009). Impact of CAD tools on creative problem solving in engineering design. Computer-Aided Design 41(3), 136146.
Robertson, B.F., Walther, J., & Radcliffe, D.F. (2007). Creativity and the use of of CAD tools: lessons for engineering design education from industry. Journal of Mechanical Design 129, 752760.
Rosario, V., & Mulet, E. (2006, April). Thinking about computer systems to support design synthesis. Communications of the ACM 29(4).
Summers, J.D., & Joshi, S. (2010). Investigating information loss in collaborative design: a case study. Capstone Design Conf., Boulder, CO.
Summers, J.D., & Shah, J.J. (2004). Representation in engineering design: a framework for classification. ASME-Design Engineering Technical Conf. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., Salt Lake City, UT.
Teegavarapu, S., & Summers, J. D. (2008). Case study method for design research. Proc. IDETC/DTM, New York.
Teegavarapu, S., Miller, S., Summers, J.D., & Mocko, G.M. (n.d.). Preliminary investigation of the use of design methods by capstone design students at a US university. Proc. ASME Asia Pacific Engineering Education Congress, Taipei, Taiwan.
Teegavarapu, S., Summers, J.D., & Mocko, G.M. (2008). Case study method for design research: a justification. ASME Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf., Computers and Information in Engineering Conf. Brooklyn, NY.
Tseng, T., & Yang, M. (2011). The role of spatial–visual skills in a project-based engineering design course. Proc. 118th ASEE Annual Conf. Exposition, 2011. Vancouver: American Society for Engineering Education.
Ullman, D.G. (2001). Toward the Mechanical Engineering Design Support System. London: Springer–Verlag.
Ullman, D.G., Wood, S., & Craig, D. (1990). The importance of drawing in the mechanical design process. Computer Graphics 14(2).
Utterback, J.M. (2006). Design Inspired Innovation. New York: World Scientific Publishing Co.
Ye, X., Peng, W., Chen, Z., & Cai, Y.-Y. (2004). Today's students, tomorrow's engineers: an industrial perspective on CAD education. Computer Aided Design 36(14), 14511460.
Yin, R.K. (2006). Case Study Methods. Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zeid, I. (2005). Mastering CAD/CAM. New York: McGraw Hill.

Keywords

Computer-aided design versus sketching: An exploratory case study

  • David Veisz (a1), Essam Z. Namouz (a1), Shraddha Joshi (a1) and Joshua D Summers (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed