Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A computational approach to biologically inspired design

  • Jacquelyn K.S. Nagel (a1) and Robert B. Stone (a2)

Abstract

The natural world provides numerous cases for analogy and inspiration in engineering design. During the early stages of design, particularly during concept generation when several variants are created, biological systems can be used to inspire innovative solutions to a design problem. However, identifying and presenting the valuable knowledge from the biological domain to an engineering designer during concept generation is currently a somewhat disorganized process or requires extensive knowledge of the biological system. To circumvent the knowledge requirement problem, we developed a computational approach for discovering biological inspiration during the early stages of design that integrates with established function-based design methods. This research defines and formalizes the information identification and knowledge transfer processes that enable systematic development of biologically inspired designs. The framework that supports our computational design approach is provided along with an example of a smart flooring device to demonstrate the approach. Biologically inspired conceptual designs are presented and validated through a literature search and comparison to existing products.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Reprint requests to: Jacquelyn K.S. Nagel, School of Engineering, James Madison University, 801 Carrier Drive, MSC 4113, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA. E-mail: nageljk@jmu.edu

References

Hide All
Addlesee, M.D., Jones, A., Livesey, F., & Samaria, F. (1997). The ORL active floor. IEEE Personal Communication 4(5), 3541.
Bar-Cohen, Y. (2006 a). Biomimetics—Using nature to inspire human innovation. Journal of Bioinspiration and Biomimetics 1, P1P12.
Bar-Cohen, Y. (2006 b). Biomimetics Biologically Inspired Technologies. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.
Bohm, M., Vucovich, J., & Stone, R. (2008). Using a design repository to drive concept generation. Journal of Computer and Information Science in Engineering 8(1), 1450214508.
Bouchard, C., Omhover, J.-F., Mougenot, C., Aoussat, A., & Westerman, S.J. (2008). TRENDS: a content-based information retrieval system for designers. Proc. Design Computing and Cognition '08, Vol. 4, pp. 593611. Atlanta, GA: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
Brebbia, C.A. (2006). Design and Nature III: Comparing Design in Nature With Science and Engineering. Southampton: WIT.
Brebbia, C.A. (2008). Design & Nature IV: Comparing Design in Nature With Science and Engineering. Southampton: WIT.
Brebbia, C.A., & Carpi, A. (2010). Design & Nature V: Comparing Design in Nature With Science and Engineering. Southampton: WIT.
Brebbia, C.A., & Collins, M.W. (2004). Design and Nature II: Comparing Design in Nature With Science and Engineering. Southampton: WIT.
Brebbia, C.A., Sucharov, L.J., & Pascolo, P. (2002). Design and Nature: Comparing Design in Nature With Science and Engineering. Southampton: WIT.
Bryant, C., Bohm, M., McAdams, D., & Stone, R. (2007). An interactive morphological matrix computational design tool: a hybrid of two methods. Proc. ASME 2007 IDETC/CIE, Las Vegas, NV.
Bryant, C., McAdams, D., Stone, R., Kurtoglu, T., & Campbell, M. (2005). A computational technique for concept generation. Proc. 2005 ASME IDETC/CIE, Long Beach, CA.
Bryant, C., Stone, R., McAdams, D., Kurtoglu, T., & Campbell, M. (2005). Concept generation from the functional basis of design. Proc. Int. Conf. Engineering Design, Melbourne, Australia.
Bryant Arnold, C.R., Stone, R.B., & McAdams, D.A. (2008). MEMIC: an interactive morphological matrix tool for automated concept generation. Proc. Industrial Engineering Research Conf.
Chakrabarti, A., Sarkar, P., Leelavathamma, B., & Nataraju, B.S. (2005). A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 19(2), 113132.
Cheong, H., Shu, L.H., Stone, R.B., & McAdams, D.A. (2008). Translating terms of the functional basis into biologically meaningful words. 2008 Proc. ASME IDETC/CIE, New York.
Chiu, I., & Shu, L.H. (2007 a). Biomimetic design through natural language analysis to facilitate cross-domain information retrieval. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 21(1), 4559.
Chiu, I., & Shu, L.H. (2007 b). Using language as related stimuli for concept generation. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 21(2), 103121.
Crane, D. (2005). New high-tech sensor-laden smart carpet may revolutionize building security. Defense Review. Accessed at http://www.defensereview.com/new-high-tech-sensor-laiden-smart-carpet-may-revolutionize-building-security/
Cross, N. (2008). Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design. Chichester: Wiley.
Dym, C.L., & Little, P. (2004). Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction. New York: Wiley.
Gordon, W.J.J. (1961). Synectics, the Development of Creative Capacity. New York: Harper.
Helms, M., Vattam, S.S., & Goel, A.K. (2009). Biologically inspired design: products and processes. Design Studies 30(5), 606622.
Hirtz, J., Stone, R., McAdams, D., Szykman, S., & Wood, K. (2002). A functional basis for engineering design: reconciling and evolving previous efforts. Research in Engineering Design 13(2), 6582.
Hong-Zhong, H., Bo, R., & Chen, W. (2006). An integrated computational intelligence approach to product concept generation and evaluation. Mechanism and Machine Theory 41(5), 567583.
Hyman, B. (1998). Engineering Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
Institution of Electrical Engineers. (2003). Research news—walk this way for the smart floor. Electronics Systems and Software 1(3), 57.
Jin, Y., & Li, W. (2007). Design concept generation: a hierarchical coevolutionary approach. Journal of Mechanical Design 129(10), 10121022.
Kurfman, M., Stone, R., Rajan, J., & Wood, K. (2003). Experimental studies assessing the repeatability of a functional modeling derivation method. Journal of Mechanical Design 125(4), 682693.
Kurtoglu, T., Campbell, M.I., Bryant, C.R., Stone, R.B., & McAdams, D.A. (2009). A component taxonomy as a framework for computational design synthesis. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 9(1), 011007.
Kurtoglu, T., Swantner, A., & Campbell, M.I. (2008). Automating the conceptual design process: from black-box to component selection. Proc. Design Computing and Cognition '08, Vol. 7, pp. 553572. Atlanta, GA: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
Liau, W.-H., Wu, C.-L., & Fu, L.-C. (2008). Inhabitants tracking system in a cluttered home environment via floor load sensors. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 5(1), 1020.
Lindemann, U., & Gramann, J. (2004). Engineering design using biological principles. Proc. Int. Design Conf., Design '04, Dubrovnik.
Linsey, J., Wood, K., & Markman, A. (2008). Modality and representation in analogy. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 22(2), 85100.
Lopez-Huertas, M.J. (1997). Thesarus structure design: a conceptual approach for improved interaction. Journal of Documentation 53(2), 139177.
Mak, T.W., & Shu, L.H. (2008). Using descriptions of biological phenomena for idea generation. Research in Engineering Design 19(1), 2128.
Nagel, J.K.S., Stone, R.B., & McAdams, D.A. (2010). An engineering-to-biology thesaurus for engineering design. Proc. 2010 ASME IDETC/CIE, Montreal.
Nagel, R., Tinsley, A., Midha, P., McAdams, D., Stone, R., & Shu, L. (2008). Exploring the use of functional models in biomimetic design. Journal of Mechanical Design 130(12), 1123.
Nagel, R.L., Stone, R., & McAdams, D. (2007). A theory for the development of conceptual functional models for automation of manual processes. Proc. 2007 ASME IDETC/CIE, Las Vegas, NV.
Orr, R.J., & Abowd, G.D. (2000). The smart floor: a mechanism for natural user identification and tracking. Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), The Hague.
Otto, K.N., & Wood, K.L. (2001). Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., & Grote, K.H. (2007). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Berlin: Springer–Verlag.
Prince, G.M. (1967). The operational mechanism of synectics. Journal of Creative Behavior 2(1), 113.
Prince, G.M. (1970). The Practice of Creativity. New York: Collier Books.
Purves, W.K., Sadava, D., Orians, G.H., & Heller, H.C. (2001). Life, The Science of Biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Richardson, B., Leydon, K., Fernström, M., & Paradiso, J.A. (2004). Z-Tiles: building blocks for modular, pressure-sensing floorspaces. Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), Vienna.
Shu, L.H., Hansen, H.N., Gegeckaite, A., Moon, J., & Chan, C. (2006). Case study in biomimetic design: handling and assembly of microparts. Proc. ASME 2006 IDETC/CIE, Philadelphia, PA.
Srinivasan, V., & Chakrabarti, A. (2009). SAPPhIRE—an approach to analysis and synthesis. Proc. Int. Conf. Engineering Design, Stanford, CA.
Stone, R., & Wood, K. (2000). Development of a functional basis for design. Journal of Mechanical Design 122(4), 359370.
Stroble, J.K., Stone, R.B., McAdams, D.A., & Watkins, S.E. (2009). An engineering-to-biology thesaurus to promote better collaboration, creativity and discovery. Proc. CIRP Design Conf. 2009, pp. 353368, Cranfield.
Ullman, D.G. (2009). The Mechanical Design Process, 4th ed.New York: McGraw–Hill.
Ulrich, K.T., & Eppinger, S.D. (2004). Product Design and Development. Boston: McGraw–Hill/Irwin.
Vincent, J.F.V., Bogatyreva, O.A., Bogatyrev, N.R., Bowyer, A., & Pahl, A.-K. (2006). Biomimetics: its practice and theory. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 3, 471482.
Voland, G. (2004). Engineering by Design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Vorwerk & Co. (2004). Infineon Thinking Carpet. Wuppertal, Germany: Vorwerk.
Wen, H.-I., Zhang, S.-j., Hapeshi, K., & Wang, X.-f. (2008). An innovative methodology of product design from nature. Journal of Bionic Engineering 5(1), 7584.
Wilson, J., Chang, P., Yim, S., & Rosen, D. (2009). Developing a bio-inspired design repository using ontologies. Proc. 2009 ASME IDETC/CIE.
Wood, W.H., Yang, M.C., Cutkosky, M.R., & Agogino, A.M. (1998). Design information retrieval: improving access to the informal side of design. Proc. ASME 1998 IDETC/CIE, Atlanta, GA.
Yao, Zu, Xiao, R., & Zhang, X. (2009). Automated conceptual design of mechanisms using enumeration and functional reasoning. International Journal of Materials and Product Technology 34(3), 273294.

Keywords

A computational approach to biologically inspired design

  • Jacquelyn K.S. Nagel (a1) and Robert B. Stone (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed