Skip to main content Accessibility help

CADSYN: A case-based design process model

  • Mary Lou Maher (a1) and Dong Mei Zhang (a1)


In solving a new design problem, the case-based reasoning paradigm provides a process model where previous experience in the form of multiple, individual design situations can be used in a new design context. Design synthesis presents challenges to current methodologies of CBR in the application of the various approaches to case memory organization, indexing, selection and transformation. The focus of this paper is on the transformation process. Multiple types of design knowledge are essential to derive a new design solution. A hybrid case-based design process model, CADSYN, is proposed to integrate specific design situations and generalized domain knowledge, where specific cases are represented as attribute-value pairs and domain knowledge is represented by generalized design concepts and constraints. Case transformation is treated as a constraint satisfaction problem, where a specific design case provides a starting point for a new design problem and constraints are used to revise the case for consistency with the new context.



Hide All
Collin, Z., Dechter, R. et al. 1991. On the feasibility of distributed constraint satisfaction. In Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-91), Sydney, Australia, pp 318324.
Dechter, R. 1990. Enhancement schemes for constraint processing: backjumping, learning, and cutset decomposition. Artificial Intelligence Journal 41(3), 273312.
Freuder, E. C. 1978. Synthesising constraint expressions. Communications of the ACM 21(11),958966.
Goel, A. and Chandrasekaren, B. 1989. Use of device models in adaptation of design cases. In Proceedings of the DARPA Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning. Pensacola Beach, Florida. pp 100109.
Hinrichs, T. R. and Kolodner, J. L. 1991. The roles of adaptation in case-based design. In Proceedings of the DARPA Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning. Washington, D.C. pp 121132.
Hua, K., Schmitt, G. and Faltings, B. 1992. Adaptation of spatial design cases. In Artificial Intelligence In Design '92. Gero, J. S. ed. Kluwer Academic, Amsterdam, pp 559575.
Mackworth, A. K. 1977. Consistency in networks of relations. Artificial Intelligence 8, 99118.
Maher, M. L. 1987. Engineering design synthesis: a domain independent representation. Al EDAM 1(3), 207213.
Maher, M. L. and Zhang, D. M. 1991. CADSYN: using case and decomposition knowledge for design synthesis. In Artificial Intelligence in Design '91, Gero, J. S., ed. Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, pp 137150.
Montanari, U. 1974. Networks of constraints: fundamental properties and applications to picture processing. Information Science 7, 95132.
Simon, H. A. 1973. The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence 4, 181201.
Sycara, K. P. and Navinchandra, D. 1989. Integrated case-based reasoning and qualitative reasoning in engineering design. In Artificial Intelligence in Design, Gero, J. S., ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 231250.
Sycara, K. P., Navinchandra, D. and Narasimhan, S. 1992. Parametric adaptation case-based design. In Proceedings of Case-Based Design Workshop of Artificial Intelligence in Design '92. Pittsburgh, PA.
Wang, J. and Howard, H. C. 1991. A design-dependent approach to integrated structural design. In Artificial Intelligence in Design '91. Gero, J. S., ed. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 151170.
Ahao, F. and Maher, M. L. 1988. Using analogical reasoning to design buildings. Engineering With Computers 4, 107119.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

CADSYN: A case-based design process model

  • Mary Lou Maher (a1) and Dong Mei Zhang (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.