Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

An ontology of situated design teams

  • John S. Gero (a1) and Udo Kannengiesser (a2)

Abstract

This paper presents an ontological framework for situated design teams in which the team is both the subject and the object of designing. Team designing is modeled using the set of processes provided by the situated function–behavior–structure framework. This is a formal basis for understanding the drivers for change in the product to be designed and in the design team. We specifically focus on changes in a team's structure that emerge from interactions among individual team members and subteams.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Bartlett, F.C. (1932, reprinted in 1977). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bickhard, M.H., & Campbell, R.L. (1996). Topologies of learning. New Ideas in Psychology 14(2), 111156.
Bradley, J.H., & Hebert, F.J. (1997). The effect of personality type on team performance. Journal of Management Development 16(5), 337353.
Brown, D.C. (1998). Defining configuring. AIEDAM: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering, Design, and Manufacturing 12(4), 301305.
Clancey, W.J. (1997). Situated Cognition: On Human Knowledge and Computer Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H.H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, P.R., & Levesque, H.J. (1991). Teamwork. Noûs 25(4), 487512.
Corkill, D.D., & Lesser, V.R. (1983). The use of meta-level control for coordination in a distributed problem-solving network. In Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence ‘83 Bond, A.H., & Gasser, L., Eds.), pp. 748755, Karlsruhe, Germany.
de Kleer, J., & Brown, J.S. (1984). A qualitative physics based on confluences. Artificial Intelligence 24, 783.
Dewey, J. (1981). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review 3, 357370.
Fischer, G. (2001). External and sharable artifacts as opportunities for social creativity in communities of interest. In Computational and Cognitive Models of Creative Design V (Gero, J.S. & Maher, M.L., Eds.), pp. 6789. Sydney, Australia: Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney.
Galbraith, J.R. (1977). Organization Design: An Information Processing View. Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley.
Gero, J.S. (1990). Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine 11(4), 2636.
Gero, J.S. (1999). Constructive memory in design thinking. In Design Thinking Research Symp.: Design Representation (Goldschmidt, G. & Porter, W., Eds.), pp. 2935. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Gero, J.S., & Fujii, H. (2000). A computational framework for concept formation for a situated design agent. Knowledge-Based Systems 13(6), 361368.
Gero, J.S., & Kannengiesser, U. (2004 a). The situated function–behaviour–structure framework. Design Studies 25(4), 373391.
Gero, J.S., & Kannengiesser, U. (2004 b). Modelling expertise of temporary design teams. Journal of Design Research 4(2).
Kannengiesser, U., & Gero, J.S. (2007). Agent-based interoperability without product model standards. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 22(2), 8097.
Kramer, R.M., & Tyler, T.R., Eds. (1996). Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levitt, R.E., Cohen, G.P., Kunz, J.C., Nass, C.I., Christiansen, T.R., & Jin, Y. (1994). The virtual design team: simulating how organization structure and information processing tools affect team performance. In Computational Organization Theory (Carley, K.M. & Prietula, M.J., Eds.), pp. 118. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Malone, T.W. (1987). Modeling coordination in organizations and markets. Management Science 33(10), 13171332.
Mesarović, M.D., Macko, D., & Takahara, Y. (1970). Theory of Hierarchical, Multilevel, Systems. New York: Academic Press.
Minsky, M. (1985). The Society of Mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5(1), 1437.
Schön, D.A., & Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies 13(2), 135156.
Smith, G.J., & Gero, J.S. (2005). What does an artificial design agent mean by being “situated”? Design Studies 26(5), 535561.
Sosa, R., & Gero, J.S. (2005). A computational study of creativity in design: The role of society. AIEDAM: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering, Design, and Manufacturing 19(4), 229244.
Suwa, M., Gero, J.S., & Purcell, T. (1999). Unexpected discoveries and s-inventions of design requirements: a key to creative designs. In Computational Models of Creative Design IV (Gero, J.S. & Maher, M.L., Eds.), pp. 297320. Sydney, Australia: Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney.
Weber, M. (1968). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.
Wegner, D.M. (1986). Transactive memory: a contemporary analysis of the group mind. In Theories of Group Behavior (Mullen, B. & Goethals, G.R., Eds.), pp. 185208. New York: Springer–Verlag.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ziemke, T. (1999). Rethinking grounding. In Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences: Does Representation Need Reality? (Riegler, A., Peschl, M. & von Stein, A., Eds.), pp. 177190. New York: Plenum Press.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

An ontology of situated design teams

  • John S. Gero (a1) and Udo Kannengiesser (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.