Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:55:48.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of sketch quality on perception of product-idea creativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2012

Barry Kudrowitz ,
Paula Te  and
David Wallace
Barry Kudrowitz*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
Paula Te
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
David Wallace
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
*
Reprint requests to: Barry Kudrowitz, University of Minnesota, 352 McNeal Hall, 1985 Buford Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA. E-mail: barryk@umn.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between the quality of a sketch and how others perceive the creativity of the idea portrayed by the sketch. In this study, sketch quality is characterized through its line work, perspective, and proportions. Four different toaster ideas were each sketched by four people with different backgrounds and levels of sketching proficiency. Then, 360 reviewers ranked the toasters for idea creativity, referring to a set of four sketches: one sketch for each toaster concept. The level of sketch quality for each toaster concept was varied among one of four quality levels. Higher quality idea sketches were found to correlate with higher creativity rank (p > 0.005), and lower quality sketches correlated with a lower creativity rank (p > 0.0005). A toaster idea portrayed with the highest quality level of sketch was 2.3 times more likely to be ranked as the most creative idea within the given set of idea sketches. The results underscore the importance of how an idea is presented, and support the need for sketching instruction in engineering and design curriculum.

Keywords

CreativityIdea EvaluationSketching
Type
Special Issue Articles
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 26 , Issue 3: Sketching and Pen-Based Design Interaction , August 2012 , pp. 267 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science 333(6046), 1096–1097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvarez, A. (Director). (2004). Techniques of Scott Robertson 1: Basic Perspective Form Drawing [Motion Picture].Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social-psychology of creativity—a consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43(5), 997–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessemer, S. P. (1998). Creative product analysis matrix: testing the model structure and a comparison among products—three novel chairs. Creativity Research Journal 11(4), 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, D. W., & Chan, L.K. (2007). Creativity and drawing abilities of Chinese students in Hong Kong: is there a connection. New Horizons in Education 55(3), 77–94.Google Scholar
Chan, D., & Zhao, Y. (2010). The relationship between drawing skill and artistic creativity: do age and artistic involvement make a difference? Creativity Research Journal 22, 1, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiaans, H. (2002). Creativity as a design criterion. Creativity Research Journal 14, 1, 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(3), 497–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eissen, K., & Steur, R. (2007). Sketching: Drawing Techniques for Product Designers. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.Google Scholar
Fish, J., & Scrivener, S. (1990). Amplifying the mind's eye: sketching and visual cognition. Leonardo 23(1), 117–126.Google Scholar
Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal 4(2), 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, G. (2006). Quo vadis, design space explorer? Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 20, 105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, D., & Salvendy, G. (2009). Measuring consumer perception of product creativity: impact on satisfaction and purchaseability. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 19(3), 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudrowitz, B., & Wallace, D. (2010). Assessing the quality of ideas from prolific, early stage product ideation. Proc. 2010 Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf., Montreal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, T. (2001). The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity From IDEO. America's Leading Design Firm. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Lipson, H., & Shpitalni, M. (2000). Conceptual design and analysis by sketching. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 14, 391–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGown, A., Green, G., & Rodgers, P.A. (1998). Visible ideas: information patterns of conceptual sketch activity. Design Studies 19, 431–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, J., & O'Brien, D. (2005). Selling your design: oral communication pedagogy in design education. Communication Education 54, 1, 6–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, B., Berner, R., & Brady, D. (2005). Get creative! How to build innovative companies. Bloomberg BusinessWeek 1 August.Google Scholar
Oehlberg, L., Lau, K., & Agogino, A. (2009). Tangible interactions in a digital age: medium and graphic visualization in design journals. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 23, 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olofsson, E., & Sjolen, K. (2005). Design Sketching. Klippan, Sweden: Design Books AB.Google Scholar
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P.G. (2010). Running experiments on Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making 5, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pink, D. (2005). A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
Rietzschel, E.F., Nijstad, B.A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). Productivity is not enough: a comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42(2), 244–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawhney, M., Verona, G., & Prandelli, E. (2005). Collaborating to create: the Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation. Journal of Interactive Marketing 19(4), 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutze, M., Sachse, P., & Römer, A. (2003). Support value of sketching in the design process. Research in Engineering Design 14, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, S., & Agogino, A. (2004). Insights on designers' sketching activities in product design teams. Proc. DETC04: ASME Design Engineering Technical Conf., Salt Lake City, UT.Google Scholar
Tovey, M, Porter, S, Newman, R. (2003). Sketching, concept development and automotive design. Design Studies 24, 135–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, D.G., Wood, S., & Craig, D. (1990). The importance of drawing in the mechanical design process. Computers & Graphics 14, 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Lugt, R. (2005). How sketching can affect the idea generation process in design group meetings. Design Studies 26(2), 101–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, M., & Cham, J. (2007). An analysis of sketching skill and its role in early stage engineering design. Journal of Mechanical Design 129(5), 476–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar