Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-684bc48f8b-rk5l8 Total loading time: 0.78 Render date: 2021-04-14T06:03:02.435Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Article contents

Central coherence and the shaping of expertise in design: evidence from designers with autism spectrum conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2018

Andy Dong
The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia and California College of the Arts, San Francisco, USA
Ann Heylighen
KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
E-mail address:


This paper proposes to contribute to our understanding of the fundamental cognitive processes essential to designing by exploring the experiences of people who have different information processing behaviors to those found in most people. In particular, we focus on people with autism spectrum conditions (ASC) because they are known to have information processing behaviors that are both maladaptive and exceptional. Central to our study is the question: what can we learn from people with ASC about cognitive processes essential to designing? The scholarship on cognitive behaviors associated with the autism spectrum and narratives on the experiences with design practice by individuals with ASC are discussed in relation to cognitive processes associated with designing. In turn, the individuals commented upon the analysis of cognitive processes associated with designing in light of their personal experiences with design practice. We conclude that the weak central coherence theory of autism provides a useful prediction of the cognitive processes necessary for expertise in design, and that both the framework for expertise in design and the way it is studied may require updating.

Research Article
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.


Ahrentzen, S and Steele, K (2009) Advancing Full Spectrum Housing: Designing for Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Retrieved from Tempe, AZ: Arizona Board of Regents.Google Scholar
Alexander, C, Ishikawa, S and Silverstein, M (1977) A Pattern Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2013) Neurodevelopmental Disorders Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edn, Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Angenent, R (2016) Comments at “What can we learn from autistic people about cognitive abilities essential to design? An exploratory study”.Google Scholar
Arciszewski, T and Michalski, RS (1994) Inferential design theory: a conceptual outline. In Gero, JS and Sudweeks, F (eds). Artificial Intelligence in Design ’94. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 295308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asperger, H (1944) Die “Autistischen Psychopathen” im Kindesalter. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten 117(1), 76136. doi: 10.1007/BF01837709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, LJ, Evans, JStBT, Dennis, I and Ormerod, TC (1997) Problem-solving strategies and expertise in engineering design. Thinking & Reasoning 3(4), 247270. doi: 10.1080/135467897394284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, LJ and Ormerod, TC (1995) Structured and opportunistic processing in design: a critical discussion. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43(1), 131151. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.1995.1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, LJ, Ormerod, TC and Morley, NJ (2004) Spontaneous analogising in engineering design: a comparative analysis of experts and novices. Design Studies 25(5), 495508. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2004.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S (1990) Autism: a specific cognitive disorder of & ‘mind-blindness’. International Review of Psychiatry 2(1), 8190. doi: 10.3109/09540269009028274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S (2001) Theory of mind and autism: a review. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation 23, 169184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S, Leslie, AM and Frith, U (1985) Does the autistic child have a theory of mind. Cognition 21(1), 3746. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumers, S and Heylighen, A (2015) Capturing experience: an autistic approach to designing space. The Design Journal 18(3), 327343. doi: 10.1080/14606925.2015.1059599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilda, Z and Gero, JS (2007) The impact of working memory limitations on the design process during conceptualization. Design Studies 28(4), 343367. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chai, K-H and Xiao, X (2012) Understanding design research: a bibliometric analysis of design studies (1996–2010). Design Studies 33(1), 2443. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2011.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, BT and Schunn, CD (2009) The role and impact of mental simulation in design. Applied Cognitive Psychology 23(3), 327344. doi: 10.1002/acp.1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiaans, H and Almendra, RA (2010) Accessing decision-making in software design. Design Studies 31(6), 641662. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2010.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, N (2003) The expertise of exceptional designers. In Cross, N and Edmonds, E (eds). Expertise in Design. Sydney: Creativity and Cognition Press.Google Scholar
Cross, N (2004) Expertise in design: an overview. Design Studies 25(5), 427441. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, N (2006) Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer-Verlag London Limited.Google Scholar
Cross, N and Cross, AC (1998) Expertise in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design 10(3), 141149. doi: 10.1007/BF01607156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, NO and Carter, AS (2014) Social development in autism. In Volkmar, FR, Rogers, SJ, Paul, R and Pelphrey, KA (eds). Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders, vol. 1, 4th edn. Hoboken: Wiley, pp. 212229.Google Scholar
Delacato, CH (1974) The Ultimate Stranger: The Autistic Child, 1st edn, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Delfos, MF (2005) A Strange World – about Autism, Asperger's Syndrome and PDD-NOS (Englander, A. & Gravendaal, E., Trans.). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
Dong, A (2005) The latent semantic approach to studying design team communication. Design Studies 26(5), 445461. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2004.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, A, Collier-Baker, E and Suddendorf, T (2017) Building blocks of human design thinking in animals. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 5(1–2), 115. doi: 10.1080/21650349.2015.1011700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, MW (1993) Principles of Cognitive Psychology. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Frith, U (2003) Autism: Explaining the Enigma, 2nd edn, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Frith, U (2008) Autism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, U and Happé, F (1994) Autism: beyond “theory of mind”. Cognition 50(1), 115132. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90024-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gemser, G, de Bont, C, Hekkert, P and Friedman, K (2012) Quality perceptions of design journals: the design scholars’ perspective. Design Studies 33(1), 423. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2011.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goel, V and Pirolli, P (1992) The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science 16(3), 395429. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1603_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T (1995 a) How people with autism think. In Schopler, E and Mesibov, GB (eds). Learning and Cognition in Autism. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 137156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T (1995 b) Thinking in Pictures and Other Reports from My Life with Autism. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Grandin, T (2009) How does visual thinking work in the mind of a person with autism? A personal account. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 364(1522), 14371442. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grandin, T (2016) From Temple Grandin.Google Scholar
Happé, F (1999) Autism: cognitive deficit or cognitive style? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3(6), 216222. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01318-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Happé, F and Frith, U (2006) The weak coherence account: detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 36(1), 525. doi: 10.1007/s10803-005-0039-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatchuel, A and Weil, B (2009) C-K design theory: an advanced formulation. Research in Engineering Design 19(4), 181192. doi: 10.1007/s00163-008-0043-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, C (2014) A cow's eye view? Cattle empathy and ethics in screen representations of temple Grandin. Animal Studies Journal 3(1), 628.Google Scholar
Hernandez, NV, Shah, JJ and Smith, SM (2010) Understanding design ideation mechanisms through multilevel aligned empirical studies. Design Studies 31(4), 382410. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2010.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heylighen, A and Martin, G (2005) Chasing concepts during design: a photo shoot from the field of architecture. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 19(4), 289299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heylighen, A and Nijs, G (2014) Designing in the absence of sight: design cognition re-articulated. Design Studies 35(2), 113132. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2013.11.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iarocci, G and McDonald, J (2006) Sensory integration and the perceptual experience of persons with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 36(1), 7790. doi: 10.1007/s10803-005-0044-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanner, L (1943) Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous Child 2, 217250.Google Scholar
Khaidzir, K and Lawson, B (2013) The cognitive construct of design conversation. Research in Engineering Design 24(4), 331347. doi: 10.1007/s00163-012-0147-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, MH, Kim, YS, Lee, HS and Park, JA (2007) An underlying cognitive aspect of design creativity: limited commitment mode control strategy. Design Studies 28(6), 585604. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2007.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, SH, Paul, R, Tager-Flusberg, H and Lord, C (2014) Language and communication in autism. In Volkmar, FR, Rogers, SJ, Paul, R and Pelphrey, KA (eds). Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders, vol. 1, 4th edn. Hoboken: Wiley, pp. 230262.Google Scholar
Kleinsmann, M, Deken, F, Dong, A and Lauche, K (2012) Development of design collaboration skills. Journal of Engineering Design 23(7), 485506. doi: 10.1080/09544828.2011.619499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, B (1994) Design in Mind. Oxford: Reed Educational and Profesional Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Lawson, B and Dorst, K (2009) Design Expertise. Oxford: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
LeCun, Y, Bengio, Y and Hinton, G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521(7553), 436444. doi: 10.1038/nature14539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lombardo, MV and Baron-Cohen, S (2011) The role of the self in mindblindness in autism. Consciousness and Cognition 20(1), 130140. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mostafa, M (2007) An architecture for autism: concepts of design intervention for the autistic user. Archnet-IJAR, International Journal of Architectural Research 2(1), 189211.Google Scholar
Nagai, Y, Taura, T and Mukai, F (2009) Concept blending and dissimilarity: factors for creative concept generation process. Design Studies 30(6), 648675. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2009.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noens, I and van Beckelaer-Onnes, I (2004) Making sense in a fragmentary world – communication in people with autism and learning disability. Autism 8(2), 197218. doi: 10.1177/1362361304042723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozonoff, S, Pennington, BF and Rogers, SJ (1991) Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic individuals: relationship to theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 32(7), 10811105. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1991.tb00351.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, C (1992) Autism into art: a handicap transfigured. In Schopler, E and Mesibov, GB (eds). High-functioning Individuals with Autism. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 250259.Google Scholar
Paton, B and Dorst, K (2011) Briefing and reframing: a situated practice. Design Studies 32(6), 573587. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petre, M (2004) How expert engineering teams use disciplines of innovation. Design Studies 25(5), 477493. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2004.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajendran, G and Mitchell, P (2007) Cognitive theories of autism. Developmental Review 27(2), 224260. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2007.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, PA, Vázquez, FS and Serrano, LA (2011) Autism and the built environment. In Williams, T (ed.). Autism Spectrum Disorders – from Genes to Environment. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, pp. 363380.Google Scholar
Schön, DA (1988) Designing: rules, types and words. Design Studies 9(3), 181190. doi: 10.1016/0142-694X(88)90047-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schön, DA and Wiggins, G (1992) Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies 13(2), 135156. doi: 10.1016/0142-694x(92)90268-f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, HA (1969) The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Simon, HA (1995) Problem forming, problem finding, and problem solving in design. In Collen, A and Gasparski, WW (eds). Design and Systems: General Applications of Methodology, vol. 3. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 245257.Google Scholar
Suddendorf, T and Dong, A (2013) On the evolution of imagination and design. In Taylor, M (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the Development of Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 453467.Google Scholar
Tonkinwise, C (2011) A taste for practices: unrepressing style in design thinking. Design Studies 32(6), 533545. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Lugt, R (2005) How sketching can affect the idea generation process in design group meetings. Design Studies 26(2), 101122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeulen, P (2010) Autisme als Contextblindheid. Berchem: Uitgeverij Acco.Google Scholar
Welsh, MC and Pennington, BF (1988) Assessing frontal lobe functioning in children: views from developmental psychology. Developmental Neuropsychology 4(3), 199230. doi: 10.1080/87565648809540405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiltschnig, S, Christensen, BT and Ball, LJ (2013) Collaborative problem–solution co-evolution in creative design. Design Studies 34(5), 515542. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2013.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wing, L (1997) The history of ideas on autism: legends, myths and reality. Autism 1(1), 1323. doi: 10.1177/1362361397011004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youmans, RJ (2011) The effects of physical prototyping and group work on the reduction of design fixation. Design Studies 32(2), 115138. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2010.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 24
Total number of PDF views: 132 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 28th May 2018 - 14th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Central coherence and the shaping of expertise in design: evidence from designers with autism spectrum conditions
Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Central coherence and the shaping of expertise in design: evidence from designers with autism spectrum conditions
Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Central coherence and the shaping of expertise in design: evidence from designers with autism spectrum conditions
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *