Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:02:55.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial Hedonic Valuation of a Multi-use Urban Wetland in Southern California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Elaine F. Frey ,
Marissa B. Palin ,
Patrick J. Walsh  and
Christine R. Whitcraft
Elaine F. Frey*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics at California State University Long Beach
Marissa B. Palin
Affiliation:
Centre for Resource Management and Environmental Studies at University of the West Indies
Patrick J. Walsh
Affiliation:
National Center for Environmental Economics of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Christine R. Whitcraft
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences at California State University Long Beach. At the time this research was conducted
*
Corresponding Author: Department of Economics, California State University, 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, SPA 349, Long Beach, CA 90840, Phone 562.985.5086, Email Elaine.Frey@csulb.edu.
Get access

Abstract

Most of Southern California's wetlands have disappeared despite being critical ecosystems with many valuable attributes. Many of the wetlands that remain are in relatively urban areas, are severely degraded, and may not function properly. Using hedonic spatial error models, we measure the economic value of living near an urban multi-use wetland in Long Beach, California. Both sales prices and estimated values are used in the analysis. Results show that proximity to wetlands increases residential property values in the focus area. This analysis provides important information for policymakers to justify ongoing restoration projects and prevent further degradation of urbanized natural resources.

Keywords

economic valuationhedonic pricingwetlands
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , August 2013 , pp. 387 - 402
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, S.T., and West, S.E. 2006. “Open Space, Residential Property Values, and Spatial Context.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 36(6): 773–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anselin, L. 1999. “Spatial Econometrics.” Working paper, University of Texas, Dallas.Google Scholar
Anselin, L. 2001. “Spatial Effects in Econometric Practice in Environmental and Resource Economics.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(3): 705–710.Google Scholar
Boyer, T., and Polasky, S. 2004. “Valuing Urban Wetlands: A Review of Non-market Valuation Students.” Wetlands 24(4): 744–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, M.A., and Kiel, K.A. 2001. “A Survey of House Price Hedonic Studies of the Impact of Environmental Externalities.” Journal of Real Estate Literature 9(2): 117–144.Google Scholar
Brander, L.M., Florax, R.J.G.M., and Vermaat, J.E. 2006. “The Empirics of Wetland Valuation: A Comprehensive Summary and a Meta-Analysis of the Literature.” Environmental and Resource Economics 33(2): 223–250.Google Scholar
Brasington, D.M., and Hite, D. 2005. “Demand for Environmental Quality: A Spatial Hedonic Analysis.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 35(1): 57–82.Google Scholar
Chamblee, J.F., Colwell, P.F., Dehring, C.A., and Depken, C.A. 2011. “The Effect of Conservation Activity on Surrounding Land Prices.” Land Economics 87(3): 453–472.Google Scholar
Cho, S., Clark, C.D., Park, W.M., and Kim, S.G. 2009. “Spatial and Temporal Variation in the Housing Market Values of Lot Size and Open Space.” Land Economics 85(1): 51–73.Google Scholar
Clapp, J.M., and Giaccotto, C. 1992. “Estimating Price Indices for Residential Property: A Comparison of Repeat Sales and Assessed Value Methods.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 87(418): 300–306.Google Scholar
Dahl, T.E. 1990. “Wetlands Losses in the United States 1780s to 1980s.” Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC. Google Scholar
Doss, C.R., and Taff, S.J. 1996. “The Influence of Wetland Type and Wetland Proximity on Residential Property Values.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 21(1): 120–129.Google Scholar
Freeman, A.M. 2003. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Friends of Colorado Lagoon, Parker, T., and Zahn, E. 2010. “Demographic Monitoring at Colorado Lagoon.” Unpublished report. A copy of this report is on file with the authors.Google Scholar
Goodman, A.C. 1978. “Hedonic Prices, Price Indices, and Housing Markets.” Journal of Urban Economics. 5(4): 471–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagerty, J.R. 2007. “How Good are Zillow's Estimates?” The Wall Street Journal, February 14.Google Scholar
Hall, D.C., Hall, J.V., and Murray, S.N. 2002. “Contingent Valuation of Marine Protected Areas: Southern California Rocky Intertidal Ecosystems.” Natural Resource Modeling 15(3): 335–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halvorsen, R., and Palmquist, R. 1980. “The Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations.” American Economic Review 70(3): 474–475.Google Scholar
Harrison, D., and Rubinfeld, D.L. 1978. “Hedonic Housing Prices and the Demand for Clean Air.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 5(1): 81–102.Google Scholar
Heal, G. 2000. “Valuing Ecosystem Services.” Ecosystems 3(1): 24–30.Google Scholar
Hollas, D.R., Rutherford, R.C., and Thomson, T.A. 2010. “Zillow's Estimates of Single-Family Housing Values.” The Appraisal Journal 78(1): 26–33.Google Scholar
Kim, J., and Goldsmith, P. 2009. “A Spatial Hedonic Approach to Assess the Impact of Swine Production on Residential Property Values.” Environmental and Resource Economics 42(4): 509–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, R.A. 2007. “Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services.” In Pretty, J.N., Ball, A.S., Orr, D., Benton, T., Lee, D.R., Guivant, J.S., eds., Sage Handbook on Environment and Society. London: Sage Publications, Ltd.Google Scholar
Lantz, V, Boxall, P.C., Kennedy, M., and Wilson, J. 2013. “The Valuation of Wetland Conservation in an Urban/Peri-urban Watershed.” Regional Environmental Change (January 2013): online. Available at http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10113-012-0393-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeSage, J., and Pace, R.K. 2009. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.Google Scholar
Ma, S., and Swinton, S.M. 2012. “Hedonic Valuation of Farmland Using Sale Prices versus Appraised Values.” Land Economics 88(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
McConnell, V., and Walls, M. 2005. The Value of Open Space: Evidence from Studies of Nonmarket Benefits. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Michaels, R.G., and Smith, V.K. 1990. “Market Segmentation and Valuing Amenities with Hedonic Models: The Case of Hazardous Waste Sites.” Journal of Urban Economics 28(2): 223–242.Google Scholar
Mitsch, W.J., and Gosselink, J.G. 2007. Wetlands. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Netusil, N.R. 2005. “The Effect of Environmental Zoning and Amenities on Property Values: Portland, Oregon.” Land Economics 81(2): 27 46.Google Scholar
Palmquist, R.B. 2005. “Property Value Models.” In Maler, K.-G. and Vincent, J., eds., Handbook of Environmental Economics (Vol. 2). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier North Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. 1974. “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.” Journal of Political Economy 82(1): 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnare, A.B., and Struyk, R.J. 1976. “Segmentation in Urban Housing Markets.” Journal of Urban Economics 3(2): 146–166.Google Scholar
Straszheim, M. 1974. “Hedonic Estimation of Housing Market Prices: A Further Comment.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 56(3): 404–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tapsuwan, S., Ingram, G., Burton, M., and Brennan, D. 2009. “Capitalized Amenity Value of Urban Wetlands: A Hedonic Property Price Approach to Urban Wetlands in Perth, Western Australia.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 53(4): 527–545.Google Scholar
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program. 1979. “Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States.” USFWS, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC. Google Scholar
Walsh, P.J., Milon, J.W., and Scrogin, D.O. 2011. “The Spatial Extent of Water Quality Benefits in Urban Housing Markets.” Land Economics 87(4): 628–644.Google Scholar