Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Socially Optimal Import Tariff and Tax Credit for Ethanol with Farm Subsidies

  • Harry de Gorter (a1), David R. Just (a1) and Qinwen Tan (a1)


We determine how the U.S. ethanol tax credit and import tariff affect the corn-ethanol-gasoline markets and how farm subsidies interact with these policies. We show how the ethanol tax credit and import tariff each uniquely affect the ethanol and gasoline prices. The ethanol import tariff alone increases the terms of trade in ethanol imports and corn exports, but decreases the terms of trade in gasoline imports and the tax costs of farm price supports. With price-contingent farm subsidies in place, the optimal tariff and tax credit will depend on the price level. When farm subsidy expenditures are high, import subsidies for ethanol may increase social welfare due to the substantial size of the fuel market relative to the corn market.



Hide All
Babcock, B. 2008a. “Situation, Outlook and Some Key Research Questions Pertaining to Biofuels.” Paper presented at the NC-1034 annual meeting, “Energy and Agriculture: Emerging Policy and R&D Issues” (March 7). Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
Babcock, B. 2008b. “The Political Economy of the U.S. Crop Insurance Program.” Paper presented at the second AIEA2 and USDA international conference, “The Economic Implications of Public Support to Agriculture” (June 19–21) in Bologna Italy.
de Gorter, H., and Just, D.R. 2007a. “The Welfare Economics of an Excise-Tax Exemption for Biofuels and the Interaction Effects with Farm Subsidies.” Working Paper No. 2007–13, Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
de Gorter, H., and Just, D.R. 2007b. “The Economics of U.S. Ethanol Import Tariffs With a Consumption Mandate and Tax Credit.” Working Paper No. 2007–21, Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
de Gorter, H., and Just, D.R. 2008. “‘Water’ in the U.S. Ethanol Tax Credit and Mandate: Implications for Rectangular Deadweight Costs and the Corn-Oil Price Relationship.Review of Agricultural Economics 30(3): 397410.
de Gorter, H., and Just, D.R. 2009. “The Welfare Economics of a Biofuel Tax Credit and the Interaction Effects with Price Contingent Farm Subsidies.American Journal of Agricultural Economics (forthcoming).
de Gorter, H., Just, D.R., and Kliauga, E.M. 2008. “Measuring the ‘Subsidy’ Component of Biofuel Policies.” Paper presented at the International Agricultural Trade Consortium (IATRC) annual meetings (December 7–9), Scottsdale, AZ.
Doornbosch, R., and Steenblik, R. 2007. “Biofuels: Is the Cure Worse than the Disease?” Report No. SG/SD/RT(2007), OECD Round Table on Sustainable Development (September 11–12), Paris, France.
Eidman, V.R. 2007. “Ethanol Economics of Dry Mill Plants.” In Corn-Based Ethanol in Illinois and the U.S.: A Report. Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
Feenstra, R.C., and Taylor, A.M. 2007. International Economics. New York: Worth Publishers.
Howse, R., van Bork, P., and Hebebrand, C. 2006. “WTO Disciplines and Biofuels: Opportunities and Constraints in the Creation of a Global Marketplace.” IPC discussion paper, International Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council, Washington, D.C.
Jank, M.J., Kutas, G., Amaral, L.F. do, and Nassar, A.M. 2007. EU and U.S. Policies on Biofuels: Potential Impact on Developing Countries. The German Marshall Fund of the United States, Washington, D.C.
Johnson, K. 2008. “Ethanol: The Battle Continues.Wall Street Journal (July 14). Available online at
Kojima, M., Mitchell, D., and Ward, W. 2007. “Considering Trade Policies for Liquid Biofuels.Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Koplow, D. 2007. “Ethanol—At What Cost? Government Support for Ethanol and Biodiesel in the United States: 2007 Update.Global Subsidies Initiative of the International Institute for Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland.
Leiby, P.N. 2007. “Estimating the Energy Security Benefits of Reduced U.S. Oil Imports.” Report No. ORNL/TM-2007/028, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
Parry, I., and Small, K. 2005. “Does Britain or the United States Have the Right Gasoline Tax?American Economic Review 95(4): 12761289.
Rajagopal, D., Sexton, S.E., Roland-Holst, D., and Zilberman, D. 2007. “Challenge of Biofuel: Filling the Tank without Emptying the Stomach?Environmental Research Letters 2(2): 19.
Rajagopal, D., and Zilberman, D. 2007. “Review of Environmental, Economic and Policy Aspects of Biofuels.” Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS4341, Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Runge, C.F., and Senauer, B. 2007. “How Biofuels Could Starve the Poor.Foreign Affairs 86(3): 4153.
Schmitz, A., Moss, C.B., and Schmitz, T.G. 2007. “Ethanol: No Free Lunch.Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization 5(3): 126.
Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R.A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D., and Yu, T.-H. 2008. “Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land Use Change.Science Express 319(5867): 12381240.
Tyner, W.E. 2007. “U.S. Ethanol Policy: Possibilities for the Future.” Working Paper No. ID-342-W, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). 2006. The Emerging Biofuels Market: Regulatory, Trade and Development Implications. United Nations, New York and Geneva.


The Socially Optimal Import Tariff and Tax Credit for Ethanol with Farm Subsidies

  • Harry de Gorter (a1), David R. Just (a1) and Qinwen Tan (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed