Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T12:21:10.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public Price Reporting in the Cash Market for Live Cattle: A Spatial Market Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Scott W. Fausti ,
Matthew A. Diersen  and
Bashir A. Qasmi
Scott W. Fausti
Affiliation:
Department of Economics at South Dakota State University in Brookings
Matthew A. Diersen
Affiliation:
Department of Economics at South Dakota State University in Brookings
Bashir A. Qasmi
Affiliation:
Department of Economics at South Dakota State University in Brookings
Get access

Abstract

Legislative authorization for the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act of 1999 was renewed in October of 2006. One of the cited justifications for implementing mandatory reporting was that the voluntary reporting system for the slaughter cattle cash market was unable to provide accurate and timely market information. We extend the spatial market analysis literature by developing a methodology for detecting distortions in spatial relationships across related price series. Using spatially linked regional markets, we compare state-level mandatory price-reporting data to the U.S. Department of Agriculture voluntarily reported state data to determine if the spatial relationship between price-reporting mechanisms was disrupted by market distortions prior to implementation of federal mandatory price reporting. We found no empirical evidence of system failure; therefore, we conclude that market thinning or noncompetitive behavior had not reached the level necessary to disrupt the ability of the voluntary price-reporting system to provide timely and accurate price information.

Keywords

public price reportingspatial marketsmarket integrationprice transparencyprice discoverylivestock markets
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , October 2007 , pp. 336 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS). 2000. “Livestock and Grain Market News Branch: Final Rule.” In Federal Register 65(232) (December 1, 2000). Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS). Various issues. “Livestock, Meat and Wool Weekly Summary and Statistics.” Weekly reports, September 1, 1999, through March 31, 2001. Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Anderson, J.D., Ward, C.E., Koontz, S.R., Peel, D.S., and Trapp, J.N. 1998. “Experimental Simulation of Public Information Impacts on Price Discovery and Marketing Efficiency in the Fed Cattle Market.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 23(1): 262–278.Google Scholar
Azzam, A. 2003. “Market Transparency and Market Structure: The Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act of 1999.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(2): 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, C.B., and Li, J.R. 2002. “Distinguishing Between Equilibrium and Integration in Spatial Price Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84(2): 292–307.Google Scholar
Economic Research Service (ERS). 2005. “Did Mandatory Requirement Aid the Market?” Report No. LDP-M-135-01, ERS, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Engle, R.F., and Granger, C.W.J. 1987. “Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing.” Econometrica 55(2): 251–276.Google Scholar
Fausti, S.W., and Diersen, M.A., 2004, “The Voluntary Reporting System's Ability to Provide Price Transparency in the Cash Market for Dressed Steers: Evidence from South Dakota.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 29(3): 553–566.Google Scholar
Fausti, S.W., He, S., and Diersen, M.A. 2003. “Discontinued Voluntary Price Reports for Live Cattle: Will They Be Missed by Producers?” Economics Staff Paper No. 2003-4, Department of Economics, South Dakota State University.Google Scholar
GAO [see U.S. Government Accountability Office].Google Scholar
Goodwin, B.K., and Schroeder, T.C. 1991. “Cointegration Tests and Spatial Price Linkages in Regional Cattle Markets.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(2): 452–464.Google Scholar
Grain Inspection and Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA). 2005. “Packers and Stockyards Statistical Report: 2003 Reporting Year.” GIPSA, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Granger, C.W.J. 1981. “Some Properties of Times Series Data and Their Uses in Econometric Model Specification.” Journal of Econometrics 16(1): 121–130.Google Scholar
Granger, C.W.J. 1983. “Co-Integration and Error Correcting Models.” Unpublished UCSD Discussion Paper No. 83-13, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Grunewald, S., Schroeder, T.C., and Ward, C.E. 2004. “Cattle Feeder Perceptions of Livestock Mandatory Price Reporting.” Review of Agricultural Economics 26(4): 521–538.Google Scholar
Gujarati, D.N. 2003. Basic Econometrics (4th edition). New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
Koontz, S.R. 1999. “Accuracy of USDA Fed Cattle Price Reporting: Is Mandatory Pricing Reporting Needed?” Proceedings of the NCR-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk, Chicago, Illinois (April).Google Scholar
McNew, K. 1996. “Spatial Market Integration: Definition, Theory, and Evidence.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 25(1): 1–11.Google Scholar
McNew, K., and Fackler, P.L. 1997. “Testing Market Equilibrium: Is Cointegration Informative?” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 22(2): 197–207.Google Scholar
Pendell, D.L., and Schroeder, T.C. 2006. “Mandatory Price Reporting and Fed Cattle Market Integration.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 31(3): 568–579.Google Scholar
SAS. 1993. SAS/ETS User's Guide, Version 6 (2nd edition). SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Schroeder, T.C., Lawrence, J., Ward, C.E., and Feuz, D.M. 2002. “Fed Cattle Marketing Trends and Concerns: Cattle Feeder Survey Results.” Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.Google Scholar
SDCL [see South Dakota Codified Law].Google Scholar
South Dakota Codified Law. 2000. “Livestock Packer Transactions.” South Dakota Codified Law, Chapter 40-15B.Google Scholar
Tomek, W.G. 1980. “Price Behavior on a Declining Terminal Market.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62(3): 434–444.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy. 2006. Available at the Energy Information Administration website, http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/oog/ftparea/wogirs/xls/psw18vwall.xls.Google Scholar
U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2005. “Livestock Market Reporting: USDA Has Taken Some Steps to Ensure Quality, But Additional Efforts Are Needed.” Report No. GAO-06-202, GAO, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Wachenheim, C.J., and DeVuyst, E.A. 2001. “Strategic Response to Mandatory Reporting Legislation in the U.S. Livestock and Meat Industries: Are Collusive Opportunities Enhanced?” Agribusiness 17(2): 177–195.Google Scholar
Ward, C.E. 2006a. “An Assessment of the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act.” Paper presented at the NCCC-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management, St. Louis, MO, April 17–18.Google Scholar
Ward, C.E. 2006b. “An Assessment of the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act.” Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, Fact Sheet No. F-606, Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
White House. 2006. Press release, Office of the Press Secretary, October 5. Available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/10/20061005-9.html.Google Scholar