Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The Political Economy of Downzoning

  • Adesoji O. Adelaja (a1) and Paul D. Gottlieb (a2)

Abstract

“Substantial downzoning” is defined as the exercise of police power to significantly reduce the legally permitted density on undeveloped land in a community. This contentious practice is typically challenged by those who perceive the action to limit their market opportunities (e.g., farmers and developers), their sympathizers, and others who prefer the status quo. Supporters tend to be those who perceive positive benefits (e.g., environmentalists, conservationists, and homeowners) and those who see it as a supplement to other preservation techniques, based on concerns over such things as growing public costs of land acquisition, limited effectiveness of existing alternatives, or the perceived urgency to act to manage growth.

Given the complexity of the issue and the lack of previous research, this paper develops a conceptual model of the public choice to “substantially downzone” and presents specific hypotheses to be empirically tested, using New Jersey as a case study. The probability of implementing substantial downzoning is found to increase with (i) the amount of open space that remains to be protected, (ii) declining farm population, (iii) recent growth in non-farm population, (iv) recent growth in land values, and (v) the presence of alternative growth management tools. Results also suggest its use as a substitute for other preservation tools when the financial and/or political ability of communities to afford other approaches is limited. Hence, the likelihood of substantial downzoning may increase over time if alternatives become more difficult to implement.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Adelaja, A. 2004. “The Value Gap: The Preservation-Viability Dilemma of Agriculture at the Urban Fringe.” Report No. 2004-2, Land Policy Institute, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Adelaja, A., and Friedman, K. 1999. “Political Economy of Right-to-Farm.Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 31(3): 565579.
Adelaja, A., Miller, T., and Taslim, M. 1998. “Land Values, Market Forces, and Declining Dairy Herd Size: Evidence from an Urban-Influenced Region.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 27(1): 6371.
Adelaja, A., and Schilling, B. 1998. “New Approaches to Farmland Preservation: Equity Insurance, Equity Mortgage and Other Innovative Mechanisms.” In Furuseth, O.J. and Lapping, M., eds., Contested Countryside: The Rural Urban Fringe in North America. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing Group.
Alonso, W. 1964. Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Baldassare, M. 1981. The Growth Dilemma: Residents’ View and Local Population Change in the United States . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Barton, N. 1998. “Speculative Behavior in Land Markets.” Unpublished M.S. thesis, Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
Bates, L.J., and Santerre, R.E. 1994. “The Determinants of Restrictive Residential Zoning: Some Empirical Findings.” Journal of Regional Science 34(2): 253263.
Burchell, R.W., Shad, N., Listokin, D., Phillips, H., Downs, A., Seskin, S., Davis, J., Moore, T., Helton, D., and Gall, M. 1998. “The Costs of Sprawl—Revisited.” TCRP Report No. 39, Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.
Campos, R.W. 1987. “Toward a Theory of Instrument Choice in the Regulation of Markets.” California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.
Chressanthis, G. 1986. “The Impact of Zoning Changes on Housing Prices: A Model and Empirical Evidence.” Growth and Change 17(1): 4970.
Daniels, T. 1999. When City and Country Collide. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Dye, T.R. 1996. Politics, Economics, and the Public: Policy Outcomes in the American States. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Etgen, R., Bernstein, J., Taylor-Rogers, S., Gray, R., Caldwell, P., Perry, E., Chapman, J., and Dehart, H.G. 2003. “Downzoning: Does It Protect Working Landscapes and Maintain Equity for the Landowner?Maryland Center for Agro-Ecology, Queenstown, MD.
Evans, T. 2004. The Race to the Middle: The Homogenization of Population Density and What It's Costing New Jersey. Trenton, NJ: New Jersey Future.
Fischel, W.A. 1985. The Economics of Zoning Laws: A Property Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Foley, B. 2004. “The Effects of Residential Minimum Lot Size Zoning on Land Development: The Case of Oakland County, Michigan.” Master's thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Frieden, B. 1979. The Environmental Protection Hustle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Furuseth, O.J. 1985a. “Influences on County Farmland Protection Efforts in California: A Discriminant Analysis.” Professional Geographer 37(4): 443451.
Furuseth, O.J. 1985b. “Local Farmland Conservation Programs in the U.S.: A Study of California Counties.” Applied Geography 5(3): 211227.
Gardner, B.D. 1977. “The Economics of Agricultural Land Preservation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59(5): 10271036.
Glaeser, E., and Gyourko, J. 2003. “The Impact of Building Restrictions on Housing Affordability.” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review 9(2): 2139.
Gottlieb, P., and Adelaja, S. 2004. “The Political Economy of Downzoning.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Denver, CO (August 1-4).
Hahn, R.W. 1990. “The Political Economy of Environmental Regulations: Toward a Unifying Framework.” Public Choice 65(1): 2147.
Henneberry, D., and Barrows, R. 1990. “Capitalization of Exclusive Agricultural Zoning into Farmland Prices.” Land Economics 66(3): 249258.
Ihlanfeldt, K.R. 2004. “Exclusionary Land-Use Regulations Within Suburban Communities: A Review of the Evidence and Policy Prescriptions.” Urban Studies 41(2): 261283.
Katz, L., and Rosen, K. 1977. “The Interjurisdictional Effects of Growth Controls on Housing Prices.” Journal of Law and Economics 30(1): 149160.
Kelly, E. 1993. Managing Community Growth: Policies, Techniques, and Impacts. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Kline, J. 2006. “Public Demand for Preserving Local Open Space.” Society and Natural Resources 19(7): 645659.
Kline, J., and Alig, R. 1999. “Does Land Use Planning Slow the Conversion of Forest and Farm Lands?Growth and Change 30(1): 322.
Kline, J., and Wichelns, D. 1994. “Using Referendum Data to Characterize Public Support for Purchasing Development Rights to Farmland.” Land Economics 70(2): 223233.
Knaap, G., and Nelson, A. 1992. The Regulated Landscape: Lessons on State Land Use Planning from Oregon. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Kotchen, M.J., and Powers, S.M. 2006. “Explaining the Appearance and Success of Voter Referenda for Open-Space Conservation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 52(1): 373390.
Logan, J.R. 1976. “Notes on the Growth Machine: Toward a Comparative Political Economy of Place.” American Journal of Sociology 82(2): 349352.
Logan, J., and Molotch, H. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Lopez, R., Adelaja, A., and Andrews, M. 1988. “The Effects of Suburbanization on Agriculture.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70(2): 346358.
Muth, R. 1971. “The Derived Demand for Urban Residential Land.” Urban Studies 8(3): 243254.
Orfield, M. 1997. Metropolitics: A Regional Agenda for Community and Stability. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Pollakowski, H., and Wachter, S. 1977. “The Effects of Land Use Constraints on Housing Prices.” Journal of Law and Economics 30(1): 149160.
Peltzman, S. 1976. “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation.” Journal of Law and Economics 19(2): 211240.
Plantinga, A., Lubowski, R., and Stavins, R. 2002. “The Effects of Potential Land Development on Agricultural Land Prices.” Faculty Research Working Paper Series No. RWP02-012, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Pogodzinski, J.M., and Sass, T.R. 1994. “The Theory and Estimation of Endogenous Zoning.” Regional Science and Labor Economics 24(5): 601630.
Protash, W., and Baldassare, M. 1983. “Growth Policies and Community Status: A Test and Modification of Logan's Theory.” Urban Affairs Quarterly 18(3): 397412.
Richardson, J. 2003. “Downzoning, Fairness, and Farmland Preservation.” Journal of Land Use 20(2): 5990.
Rolleston, B.S. 1987. “Determinants of Restrictive Suburban Zoning: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Urban Economics 21(1): 121.
Rudel, T. 1989. Situations and Strategies in American Land-Use Planning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Samuels, M. 2004. “The Impact of Downzoning on Agricultural Land Value in New Jersey.” Study by Clarion/Samuels Associates for the New Jersey Farm Bureau.
Schilling, B., Marxen, L., and Onyango, B. 2004. “Political Economy of Local Land Preservation Taxes in New Jersey.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 33(2): 301.
SmartGrowth Network. 2002. “Getting to Smartgrowth: 100 Policies for Implementation.” Produced in collaboration with the International City Managers’ Association. Available at http://www.smartgrowth.org/pdf/gettosg.pdf (accessed January 10, 2005).
Spalatro, F., and Provencher, B. 2001. “An Analysis of Minimum Frontage Zoning to Preserve Lakefront Amenities.” Land Economics 77(4): 469481.
Vaillancourt, F., and Monty, L. 1985. “The Effects of Agricultural Zoning on Land Prices, Quebec, 1975-81.Land Economics 61(1): 3642.
Wallace, N. 1988. “The Market Effect of Zoning Undeveloped Land: Does Zoning Follow the Market?Journal of Urban Economics 23(1): 307326.
White, J. 1988. “Large Lot Zoning and Subdivision Costs: A Test.” Journal of Urban Economics 23(1): 370384.
Wisand, K., and Muth, R. 1972. “A Note on the Variation of Land Values with Distance from the CBD in St. Louis.Journal of Regional Science 12(3): 269273.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed