Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:26:22.996Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Zoning, Development Timing, and Agricultural Land Use at the Suburban Fringe: A Competing Risks Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Diane Hite ,
Brent Sohngen  and
Josh Templeton
Diane Hite
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University
Brent Sohngen
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics, The Ohio State University
Josh Templeton
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics, The Ohio State University
Get access

Abstract

Competing risks survival analysis is used to investigate tax and zoning policy impacts on residential, commercial, and industrial development timing in a rapidly growing Midwestern county. Industrial development appears both to precede and occur concurrently with residential development, while commercial development follows other types. Although residences appear to locate away from industrial land, zoning decisions favoring industry may attract rather than deter residential development within a jurisdiction. Regions with higher infrastructure taxes experience development later. Because school taxes fund local public goods important to homeowners, they have little influence on residential timing, but strong influences on industrial and commercial timing.

Keywords

land use changeland use policysurvival models
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , April 2003 , pp. 145 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, P. D. (1995). Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. E. (1986). “Property Taxes and the Timing of Urban Land Development.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 16, 483–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. E. (1993). “Land Development, Externalities, and Pigouvian Taxes.” Journal of Urban Economics 33, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentick, B. L. (1979). “The Impact of Taxation and Valuation Practices on the Timing and Efficiency of Land Use.” Journal of Political Economy 87(4), 859–868.Google Scholar
Bockstael, N. E. (1996). “Modeling Economics and Ecology: The Importance of a Spatial Perspective.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(5), 1168–1180.Google Scholar
Brueckner, J. K. (2000). “Urban Sprawl: Diagnosis and Remedies.” International Regional Science Review 23(2), 160–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capozza, D., and Li, Y. (1994). “The Intensity and Timing of Investment: The Case of Land.” American Economic Review 84(4), 889–904.Google Scholar
Fujita, M., Krugman, P., and Venables, A. J. (1999). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, M., Thisse, J.-F., and Zenou, Y. (1997). “On the Endogenous Formation of Secondary Employment Centers in a City.” Journal of Urban Economics 41, 337–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, P., and Richardson, R. W. (2000, January 24). “Critiquing Sprawl's Critics.” Policy Analysis No. 385, The Cato Institute, Washington, DC. Online. Available at http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-365es.html.Google Scholar
Hamilton, B. W., and Röell, A. (1982). “Wasteful Commuting.” Journal of Political Economy 90(5), 1035–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, E. G., Bell, K. P., and Geoghegan, J. (2003, April). “Modeling and Managing Urban Growth at the Rural-Urban Fringe: A Parcel-Level Model of Residential Land Use Change.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 32(1), 83–102 [this journal issue].Google Scholar
Irwin, E. G., and Bockstael, N. E. (2002). “Interacting Agents, Spatial Externalities, and the Endogenous Evolution of Residential Land Use Patterns.” Journal of Economic Geography 2(1), 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, M. E. (2000). “The Environmental Impact of Suburbanization.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 19(4), 569–586.Google Scholar
Lawless, J. F. (1982). Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data. New York: John C. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Mayer, C. J., and Somerville, C. T. (2000). “Land Use Regulation and New Construction.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 30, 639–662.Google Scholar
McFarlane, A. (1999). “Taxes, Fees, and Urban Development.” Journal of Urban Economics 46, 416–436.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. J., and Miller, D. J. (2001). “Agricultural Land Values and the Value of Rights to Future Land Development.” Land Economics 77(1), 56–67.Google Scholar
Turnbull, G. K. (1988a). “The Effects of Local Taxes and Public Services on Residential Development Patterns.” Journal of Regional Science 28, 541–562.Google Scholar
Turnbull, G. K. (1988b). “Property Taxes and the Transition of Land to Urban Uses.” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 1, 393–403.Google Scholar