Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-nbrzn Total loading time: 0.326 Render date: 2021-04-18T20:48:52.006Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Evaluation of Crop Insurance Yield Guarantees and Producer Welfare with Upward-Trending Yields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Shyam Adhikari
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics at Texas Tech University, in Lubbock, Texas
Thomas O. Knight
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics at Texas Tech University
Eric J. Belasco
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics at Montana State University, in Bozeman, Montana
Get access

Abstract

Actual Production History (APH) yields play a critical role in determining the coverage offered to producers by the Risk Management Agency's yield-based crop insurance products. Using both county and individual insured unit data, we examine the impact of APH yield trends for Texas cotton and Illinois com. Our findings indicate that biases due to using simple average APH yields when yields are trending upward reduce the expected indemnity and actuarially fair premium rate. The estimated welfare effect also varies significantly with different commonly used detrending approaches. This study demonstrates that producer welfare can be enhanced through proper treatment of yield trends in crop insurance programs.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Atwood, J., Shaik, S., and Watts, M. 2002. “Can Normality Be Assumed for Crop Insurance?Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 50(2): 171184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriquiry, M.A., Babcock, B.A., and Hart, C.E. 2008. “Using a Farmer's Beta for Improved Estimation of Expected Yields.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 33(1): 5263.Google Scholar
Chavas, J.P. 2004. Risk Analysis in Theory and Practice. London: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Glauber, J.W. 2004. “Crop Insurance Reconsidered.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(5): 11791195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, B.K., and Ker, A.P. 1998. “Nonparametric Estimation of Crop Yield Distributions: Implications for Rating Group Risk (GRP) Crop Insurance Contracts.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(1): 139153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, B.K., and Mahul, O. 2004. “Risk Modeling Concepts Relating to the Design and Rating of Agricultural Insurance Contracts.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 392, World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Harri, A., Erdem, C., Coble, K.H., and Knight, T.O. 2009. “Crop Yield Distributions: Reconciliation of Previous Research and Statistical Tests for Normality.” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 31(1): 163182.Google Scholar
Ker, A.P., and Goodwin, B.K. 2000. “Nonparametric Estimation of Crop Insurance Rates Revisited.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(2): 463478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahul, O. 1999. “Optimal Area Yield Crop Insurance.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(1): 7582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranda, M.J. 1991. “Area Yield Crop Insurance Reconsidered.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(2): 233242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J.W., Outlaw, J.L., Knappek, G.M., Raultson, J.M., Herbst, B.K., Anderson, D.P., and Klose, S.L. 2008. “Representative Farms Economic Outlook for the December 2008 FAPRI/AFPC Baseline.” Agricultural and Food Policy Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.Google Scholar
Skees, J.R., and Reed, M.R. 1986. “Rate Making for Farm Level Crop Insurance: Implications for Adverse Selection.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68(3): 653659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umarov, A. 2009. “Three Essays on Crop Insurance: RMA's Rules and Participation, and Perceptions.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Yu, T., and Babcock, B.A. 2010. “Are U.S. Corn and Soybeans Becoming More Drought Tolerant?American Journal of Agricultural Economics 92(5): 13101323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodard, J.D. 2009. “Three Essays on Systemic Risk and Rating in Crop Insurance Market.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 8 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 15th September 2016 - 18th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Evaluation of Crop Insurance Yield Guarantees and Producer Welfare with Upward-Trending Yields
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Evaluation of Crop Insurance Yield Guarantees and Producer Welfare with Upward-Trending Yields
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Evaluation of Crop Insurance Yield Guarantees and Producer Welfare with Upward-Trending Yields
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *