Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T21:34:27.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Larger Chinese text spacing and size: effects on older users’ experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2018

Guanhua Hou
Affiliation:
College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
Hua Dong*
Affiliation:
College of Design and Innovation, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
Weining Ning
Affiliation:
College of Design and Innovation, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
Lianghao Han
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
*
*Corresponding author. Email: donghua@tongji.edu.cn

Abstract

With declining vision ability, character spacing and size on smartphones designed for the general population are not accessible for older adults. This study aimed to explore how larger Chinese character spacing and size affect older adults’ user experience (UX). An orthogonal experiment was conducted. The optimal range of font size (FS), word spacing (WS) and line spacing (LS) were proposed utilising subjective evaluations to investigate the correlation of eye movement data with participants perceived UX. The results showed that improvement in different aspects of UX varied when FS, WS and LS increased. Overall, participants preferred larger FS, WS and LS, however, the larger FS, WS and LS values are more likely to cause errors and slower reading speed. These results suggest that the distinct combination of size and spacing depends on the motivation, needs and situation of older people when reading on a smartphone. These findings will help designers to provide better design for the older people.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alotaibi, AZ (2007) The effect of font size and type on reading performance with Arabic words in normally sighted and simulated cataract subjects. Clinical and Experimental Optometry 90, 203206.Google Scholar
Bernard, ML, Chaparro, BS, Mills, MM and Halcomb, CG (2003) Comparing the effects of text size and format on the readability of computer-displayed Times New Roman and Arial text. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 59, 823835.Google Scholar
Bernard, ML, Liao, CH and Mills, MM (2001) The effects of font type and size on the legibility and reading time of online text by older adults. In Tremaine, MM (ed.), Proceedings of ACM CHI 2001, Vol. II. New York: ACM Press, pp. 175176.Google Scholar
Borowsky, A, Horrey, WJ, Liang, YL, Garabet, A, Simmons, L and Fisher, DL (2016) The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers’ ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard. Accident Analysis and Prevention 93, 207216.Google Scholar
Brajnik, G and Giachin, C (2014) Using sketches and storyboards to assess impact of age difference in user experience. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 72, 552566.Google Scholar
Chan, A and Lee, P (2005) Effect of display factors on Chinese reading times, comprehension scores and preferences. Behaviour & Information Technology 24, 8191.Google Scholar
Chen, Y, Xie, X, Ma, WY and Zhang, HJ (2005) Adapting web pages for small-screen devices. IEEE Internet Computing 9, 5056.Google Scholar
Darroch, I, Goodman, J, Brewster, S and Gray, P (2005) The effect of age and font size on reading text on handheld computers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3585, 253–66.Google Scholar
Granholm, E, Morris, SK, Sarkin, AJ, Asarnow, RF and Jeste, DV (1997) Pupillary responses index overload of working memory resources in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 106, 458467.Google Scholar
Hazel, CA and Elliott, DB (2002) The dependency of logMAR visual acuity measurements on chart design and scoring rule. Optometry & Vision Science: Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry 79, 788792.Google Scholar
Huang, DL, Rau, PLP and Liu, Y (2009) Effects of font size, display resolution and task type on reading Chinese fonts from mobile devices. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39, 8189.Google Scholar
Ihm, J and Hsieh, YP (2015) The implications of information and communication technology use for the social well-being of older adults. Information Communication & Society 18, 11231138.Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (2010) Ergonomics of Human System Interaction Part 210: Human Centered Design for Interactive Systems. ISO 9241-210. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, pp. 79.Google Scholar
Ko, P, Mohapatra, A, Bailey, IL, Sheedy, J and Rempel, DM (2014) Effect of font size and glare on computer tasks in young and older adults. Optometry & Vision Science: Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry 91, 682689.Google Scholar
Lewis, JR (1991) Psychometric evaluation of an after-scenario questionnaire for computer usability studies: the ASQ. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 23, 7881.Google Scholar
Ling, J and Schaik, PV (2007) The influence of line spacing and text alignment on visual search of web pages. Displays 28, 6067.Google Scholar
Liu, N, Yu, R and Zhang, Y (2016) Effects of font size, stroke width, and character complexity on the legibility of Chinese characters. Human Factors & Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 26, 381392.Google Scholar
Mills, CB and Weldon, LJ (1987) Reading text from computer screens. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 19, 329357.Google Scholar
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2016) China Statistical Yearbook 2016. Available online at http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2016/indexeh.htm.Google Scholar
Paas, FGWC and Vanmerrienboer, JJG (1994) Instructional-control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review 6, 351371.Google Scholar
Paas, F, Renkl, A and Sweller, J (2003) Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments. Educational Psychologist 38, 14.Google Scholar
Rayner, K and Pollatsek, A (1996) Reading unspaced text is not easy: comments on the implications of Epelboim et al.’s (1994) study for models of eye movement control in reading. Vision Research 36, 461470.Google Scholar
Rayner, K, Fischer, MH and Pollatsek, A (1998) Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research 38, 11291144.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, JD, Lane, KJ, Ousler, GW, Angjeli, E, Smith, LM, Bateman, KM and Abelson, MB (2016) Diurnal tracking of blink and relationship to signs and symptoms of dry eye. Cornea 35, 11041111.Google Scholar
Scott, GG and Hand, CJ (2016) Motivation determines Facebook viewing strategy: an eye movement analysis. Computers in Human Behavior 56, 267280.Google Scholar
Shurtleff, DA (1967) Studies in television legibility: a review of the literature. Information Display 4, 4348.Google Scholar
Streveler, DJ and Wasserman, AI (1984) Quantitative measures of the spatial properties of screen designs. In Shackel, B (ed.), Proceedings of the IFIP TC13 First International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 8189.Google Scholar
Tullis, TS, Boynton, JL and Hersh, H (1995) Readability of fonts in the windows environment. In Katz, I, Mack, R and Marks, L (eds), CHI'95 Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM Press, pp. 127128.Google Scholar
Wang, L, Sato, H, Rau, PLP, Fujimura, K, Gao, Q and Asano, Y (2009) Chinese text spacing on mobile phones for senior citizens. Educational Gerontology 35, 7790.Google Scholar
Yamakami, T (2012) Transition analysis of mobile social games from feature-phone to smart-phone. In Barolli, L, Taniar, D and Enokido, T (eds), International Conference of Network-based Information Systems. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 226230.Google Scholar