Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T14:33:27.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethnic differences in patterns of social exchange among older adults: the role of resource context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2008

KATHERINE L. FIORI ,
NATHAN S. CONSEDINE  and
CAROL MAGAI
KATHERINE L. FIORI*
Affiliation:
Intercultural Institute on Human Development and Aging, Long Island University, Brooklyn, New York City.
NATHAN S. CONSEDINE
Affiliation:
Intercultural Institute on Human Development and Aging, Long Island University, Brooklyn, New York City.
CAROL MAGAI
Affiliation:
Intercultural Institute on Human Development and Aging, Long Island University, Brooklyn, New York City.
*
Address for correspondence: Katherine Fiori, Intercultural Institute on Human Development and Aging, Long Island University, 191 Willoughby Street, Suite 1A, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA. Email: katherine.fiori@liu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using social capital and social exchange theories, this investigation examined ethnic variation in patterns of social exchange in two heterogeneous racial groups, Blacks and Whites in the United States, and the effects of education and income on these patterns. The sample was 1,043 people aged 65–86 years from four ethnic groups (US-born European-Americans, immigrant Russians/Ukrainians, US-born African-Americans, and immigrant English-speaking Caribbeans) who had provided details of their instrumental and advice exchanges with kin and non-kin. Hierarchical multinomial logistic regressions were used to predict patterns of social exchange, variations by ethnicity, income and education, and the interactions. Ethnic differences in patterns of social exchange were found, but almost all were qualified by interactions. Those with income showed within-group heterogeneity: African-Americans and Russians/Ukrainians with higher income were more likely to engage in reciprocal instrumental kin exchange, whereas among English-speaking Caribbeans and European-Americans such exchanges were not associated with income. Unlike among European-Americans and English-speaking Caribbeans, Russians/Ukrainians with higher income and education were more likely to engage in reciprocal non-kin exchange. The findings suggest that ethnic variation in social exchange reflects both aspects of ethnic group membership and the relational context, as well as the enactment of reciprocity values in varying resource contexts.

Keywords

reciprocitysocial relationsincomeeducationethnicityNew York
Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , May 2008 , pp. 495 - 524
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajrouch, K. J., Antonucci, T. C. and Janevic, M. R. 2001. Social networks among blacks and whites: the interaction between race and age. Journals of Gerontology, 56, 2, S112–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allison, P. D. 1999. Comparing logit and probit coefficients across groups. Sociological Methods and Research, 28, 2, 186–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althausen, L. 1996. Russian families. In McGoldrick, M., Giordano, J. and Pearce, J. K. (eds), Ethnicity and Family Therapy. Second edition, Guilford, New York, 680–7.Google Scholar
Antonucci, T. C. 1985. Personal characteristics, social support and social behavior. In Binstock, R. H. and Shanas, E. (eds), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences. Second edition, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 94–128.Google Scholar
Antonucci, T. C. 2001. Social relations: an examination of social networks, social support, and sense of control. In Birren, J. E. and Schaie, K. W. (eds), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging. Fifth edtion, Academic, San Diego, California, 427–53.Google Scholar
Antonucci, T. C., Fuhrer, R. and Jackson, J. S. 1990. Social support and reciprocity: a cross-ethnic and cross-national perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 519–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonucci, T. C. and Jackson, J. S. 1990. The role of reciprocity in social support. In Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G. and Pierce, G. R. (eds), Social Support: An Interactional View. Wiley, New York, 173–98.Google Scholar
Aroian, K. J., Norris, A. E. and Chiang, L. 2003. Gender differences in psychological distress among immigrants from the former Soviet Union. Sex Roles, 48, 1/2, 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkman, L. F. and Syme, S. L. 1979. Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. American Journal of Epidemiology, 109, 2, 186–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Betancourt, H. and Lopez, S. R. 1993. The study of culture, ethnicity, and race in American psychology. American Psychologist, 48, 629–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brice, J. 1996. West Indian families. In McGoldrick, M., Giordano, J. and Pearce, J. K. (eds), Ethnicity and Family Therapy. Second edition, Guilford, New York, 123–33.Google Scholar
Broese, van Groenou M., Glaser, K., Tomassini, C. and Jacobs, T. 2006. Socio-economic status differences in older people's use of informal and formal help: a comparison of four European countries. Ageing & Society, 26, 5, 745–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, W. M., Consedine, N. S. and Magai, C. 2005. Altruism relates to health in an ethnically diverse sample of older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 60, 3, P143–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannuscio, C., Block, J. and Kawachi, I. 2003. Social capital and successful aging: the role of senior housing. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139, 5, 395–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carstensen, L. L. 1993. Motivation for social contact across the life span: a theory of socioemotional selectivity. In Jacobs, J. E.(ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Developmental Perspectives on Motivation. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska, 209–54.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L. and Löckenhoff, C. E. 2003. Aging, emotion, and evolution: the bigger picture. In Ekman, P., Campos, J. J., Davidson, R. J. and de Waal, F. B. M. (eds), Emotions Inside Out: 130 years after Darwin's ‘The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals’. New York University Press, New York, 152–79.Google Scholar
Cohen, C. I. and Sokolovsky, J. 1979. Clinical use of network analyses for psychiatric and aged populations. Community Mental Health Journal, 15, 3, 203–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consedine, N. S., Magai, C. and Conway, F. 2004. Predicting ethnic variation in adaptation to later life: styles of socioemotional functioning and constrained heterotypy. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 19, 1, 97–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dominguez, S. and Watkins, C. 2003. Creating networks for survival and mobility: social capital among African-American and Latin-American low-income mothers. Social Problems, 50, 1, 111–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, M. E. J., Iida, M., Bolger, N. and Shrout, P. E. 2003. Daily supportive equity in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 8, 1036–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golden, R. R., Teresi, J. A. and Gurland, B. J. 1984. Development of indicator scales for the Comprehensive Assessment and Referral Evaluation (CARE). Journal of Gerontology, 39, 2, 138–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gouldner, A. W. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 2, 161–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundy, E. and Holt, G. 2001. The socioeconomic status of older adults: how should we measure it in studies of health inequalities? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55, 12, 895–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogan, D. P., Eggebeen, D. J. and Clogg, C. C. 1993. The structure of intergenerational exchanges in American families. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 6, 1428–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikkink, K. K. and van Tilburg, T. 1999. Broken ties: reciprocity and other factors affecting the determination of older adults' relationships. Social Networks, 21, 1, 131–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingersoll-Dayton, B. and Antonucci, T. C. 1988. Reciprocal and nonreciprocal social support: contrasting sides of intimate relationships. Journal of Gerontology, 43, 3, S65–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaskinskaja-Lahti, I., Liebkind, K., Jaakkola, M. and Reuter, A. 2006. Perceived discrimination, social support networks, and psychological well-being among three immigrant groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 3, 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. L. and Barer, B. M. 1997. Life Beyond 85 Years: The Aura of Survivorship. Springer Publishing Company, New York.Google Scholar
Jung, J. 1990. The role of reciprocity in social support. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 3, 243–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, R. C. and Neighbors, H. W. 1986. A new perspective on the relationships among race, social class, and psychological distress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27, June, 107–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, H. K. and McKenry, P. C. 1998. Social networks and support: a comparison of African-Americans, Asian Americans, Caucasians, and Hispanics. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 29, 2, 313–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, N. 2001. Social support. In Binstock, R. H.(ed.), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences. Fifth edition, Academic, San Diego, California, 272–94.Google Scholar
Krause, N. and Borawski-Clark, E. 1995. Social class differences in social support among older adults. The Gerontologist, 35, 4, 498–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leipzig, C. 2006. When Russians come to therapy. American Journal of Family Therapy, 34, 219–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litwin, H. 2004 a. Intergenerational exchange and mental health in later-life: the case of older Jewish Israelis. Aging and Mental Health, 8, 3, 196–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Litwin, H. 2004 b. Intergenerational exchange patterns and their correlates in an aging Israeli cohort. Research on Aging, 26, 2, 202–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenstein, A. and Daatland, S. O. 2006. Filial norms and family support in a comparative cross-national context: evidence from the OASIS study. Ageing & Society, 26, 2, 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magai, C., Cohen, C., Milburn, N., Thorpe, B., McPherson, R. and Peralta, D. 2001. Attachment styles in older European American and African-American adults. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 56, 1, S28–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markides, K. S. and Black, S. A. 1995. Race, ethnicity, and aging: the impact of inequality. In Binstock, R. H. and George, L. K. (eds), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences. Fourth edition, Academic, New York, 153–70.Google Scholar
Mickelson, K. D. and Kubzansky, L. D. 2003. Social distribution of social support: the mediating role of life events. American Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 3/4, 265–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, A. M., Sorokin, O., Wang, E., Feetham, S., Choi, M. and Wilburt, J. 2006. Acculturation, social alienation, and depressed mood in midlife women from the former Soviet Union. Research in Nursing and Health, 29, 134–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Onyx, J. and Bullen, P. 2000. Measuring social capital in five communities. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36, 1, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patico, J. 2002. Chocolate and cognac: gifts and the recognition of social worlds in post-Soviet Russia. Ethnos, 67, 3, 345–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peek, M. K. and O'Neill, G. S. 2001. Networks in later life: an examination of race differences in social support networks. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 52, 3, 207–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phinney, J. S., Ong, A. and Madden, T. 2000. Cultural values and intergenerational value discrepancies in immigrant and non-immigrant families. Child Development, 71, 2, 528–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone. Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
Rook, K. S. 1987. Reciprocity of social exchange and social satisfaction among older women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1, 145–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, D. W. and Cutrona, C. E. 1991. Social support, stress, and depressive symptoms among the elderly: test of a process model. Psychology and Aging, 6, 2, 190–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwarz, B., Trommsdorff, G., Albert, I. and Mayer, B. 2005. Adult parent-child relationships: relationships quality, support, and reciprocity. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 3, 396–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeman, T. E. 1996. Social ties and health: the benefits of social integration. Annals of Epidemiology, 6, 442–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverstein, M. and Waite, L. J. 1993. Are Blacks more likely than Whites to receive and provide social support in middle and old age? Yes, no, and maybe so. Journal of Gerontology, 48, 4, S212–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, E. S. 1992. Reciprocity in social support: an advantage for the aging family. Families in Society, 73, 9, 533–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treas, J. and Mazumdar, S. 2002. Older people in America's immigrant families: dilemmas of dependence, integration, and isolation. Journal of Aging Studies, 16, 243–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Väänänen, A., Buunk, B. P., Kivimäki, M., Pentti, J. and Vahtera, J. 2005. When it is better to give than to receive: long-term health effects of perceived reciprocity in support exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 2, 176–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, R. 2006. Using Heterogeneous Choice Models to Compare Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups. Department of Sociology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana. Published online at http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam/oglm/RW_Hetero_Choice.pdf [Accessed February 2007].Google Scholar