Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T00:51:00.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Interpretation of Evidence in African History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Extract

In the preceding essay Janet Ewald has rightly stressed the critical importance of field work in revealing the manifold relations among different factors, institutions, and events in the past as well as those between the past and the present. She has also noted the disparate, eclectic, and even anarchic nature of the data obtained, making interpretation and analysis of the data a second, a perhaps even more difficult, hurdle that African historians must face between overcoming the confusions and complexities of field work and confronting the third hurdle of historical analysis. Having collected the evidence, then, our task shifts to its interpretation.

African history has been called the decathalon of the social sciences as we sought to employ seemingly complementary methodologies, data, and theoretical perspectives of history, archaeology, comparative linguistics, anthropology, ethnography, and oral traditions to overcome the limited amount of documentary material available to us. The move was an audacious assault on disciplinary boundaries, but one that sometimes resulted in naive uses of data and analysis without proper consideration of the complexities of other fields. Wars between historians and anthropologists have been endemic. But we have all become more sophisticated in our use of other disciplinary perspectives in the process, so that today we see emerging both an increasingly sensitive anthropological history as well as a more subtle historical anthropology.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berger, I. 1980. “Deities, Dynasties and Oral Tradition: The History of the Legend of the Abacwwezi,” pp. 6181 in Miller, J.C. (ed.) The African Past Speaks. Folkestone: Dawson.Google Scholar
Ewald, J. 1985. “Experience and Speculation: History and Founding Stories in the Kingdom of Tagoli, 1780-1938,” International Journal of African Historical Studies 18/2: 265–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harms, R.W. 1983. “The Wars of August: Diagonal Narrative in African History,” American Historical Review. 88/4: 809–34.Google Scholar
Miller, J.C. (ed.). 1980. The African Past Speaks. Folkestone: Dawson.Google Scholar
Moore, S.F. 1986. Social Facts and Fabrications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nurse, D.T. and Spear, T. 1985. The Swahili: Reconstructing the History and Language of an African Society, 800-1500. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. 1985. Islands of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spear, T. 1978. The Kaya Complex: A History of the Mijikenda Peoples of the Kenya Coast to 1900. Nairobi: Kenya Literature Bureau.Google Scholar
Spear, T. 1981a. Kenya's Past: An Introduction to Historical Method in Africa. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Spear, T. 1981b. “Oral Traditions: Whose History?History in Africa, 8: 165–81.Google Scholar
Spear, T. 1982. Traditions or Origins and their Interpretation: The Mijikenda of Kenya. Athens: Ohio University Center for International Studies.Google Scholar
Vansina, J. 1961. De la tradition Orale, translated as Oral Tradition. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Spear, T. 1985. Oral Tradition as History. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Willis, R. 1981. A State in the Making. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar