Airbus and Boeing are cooperatively presenting this topic dealing with transport aircraft stalls. The paper will begin by defining a stall, followed by a review of requirements, predictive validation and flight testing. There are various ways of designing modern jet transports for the stall regime such as aerodynamic approaches, flight deck indications, and augmentation control laws to deal with the high angle-of-attack (α) arena. The goal of augmented control laws for high α is common – no full aerodynamic stall or loss of climb performance should occur in the operational flight envelope, in Normal flight control modes. The validation techniques employed in preparation for a flight test campaign will follow. These include flight characteristic predictions based on wind-tunnel data as well as pilot-in-the-loop simulation rehearsals. The preparation for flight testing will be reviewed from both the engineer and pilot viewpoints. This will be followed by a review of various flight testing that has been conducted. The paper will close with a brief foray into what the future of transport stalls could be – perhaps protection features in degraded flight control modes? What are the benefits as well as drawbacks to increased augmentation for high α?

The aerodynamic flow conditions on wings and tail surfaces due to the rotational motion of a spinning aeroplane have been investigated in a full-scale spin flight research programme at the Brunel Flight Safety Laboratory. The wing upper surface vortex has been visualised using smoke and tufts on the wing of a Slingsby Firefly. The flow structures on top of both wings, and on top of the horizontal tail surfaces, have also been studied on a Saab Safir. The development of these rotational flow effects has been related to the spin motion and the effect on the spin dynamics has been studied and discussed. Evidence suggests that the turbulent wake from the wing upper surface vortex impinges the tail of the aircraft during the spin entry. It is hypothesised that the turbulent flow structure on the outside upper wing surface is due to additional accelerations induced by the rotational motion of the aeroplane. Furthermore, the lightening in stick force during spin entry and the apparent increase in push force required for spin recovery corresponds to the observed change in flow condition on the horizontal tail. The difference in pressure on the upper and lower horizontal tail surfaces have been measured using differential pressure sensors, and the result corresponds both with the observed flow conditions and earlier research results from NASA.

This paper describes a simulation technique that has been developed to quantify the unsteady forces and moments that are imposed onto a maritime helicopter by a ship’s airwake during a deck landing. An unsteady CFD-generated airwake, created using a CAD model of the ship, is integrated with a flight dynamics model of a helicopter. By holding the helicopter at a fixed position in the airwake it is possible to quantify the unsteady forces and moments imposed on the aircraft. The technique is therefore a software-based airwake dynamometer, and has been called the virtual AirDyn. As well as determining the mean loads, from consideration of the unsteady loads in the closed-loop pilot response frequency range of 0·2-2Hz it is also possible to quantify the magnitude of the unsteady disturbance in each axis. The loads are also indicators of the control activity the pilot would have to exert to maintain aircraft position and attitude. By placing the virtual AirDyn at different positions around the landing deck in different wind conditions, it is able to quantify the effect of the airwake on the mean and unsteady loads. The quantified loads can be explained by examining the CFD-generated flow field, and the geometric features on the ship’s superstructure that gave rise to them can be identified. The virtual AirDyn is therefore a tool that can be used to evaluate and inform ship design for maritime helicopter operations.

Modern gas turbine combustor design is a complex task which includes both experimental and empirical knowledge. Numerous parameters have to be considered for combustor designs which include combustor size, combustion efficiency, emissions and so on. Several empirical correlations and experienced approaches have been developed and summarised in literature for designing conventional combustors. A large number of advanced technologies have been successfully employed to reduce emissions significantly in the last few decades. There is no literature in the public domain for providing detailed design methodologies of triple annular combustors.

The objective of this study is to provide a detailed method designing a triple annular dry low emission industrial combustor and evaluate its performance, based on the operating conditions of an industrial engine. The design methodology employs semi-empirical and empirical models for designing different components of gas turbine combustors. Meanwhile, advanced DLE methods such as lean fuel combustion, premixed methods, staged combustion, triple annular, multi-passage diffusers, machined cooling rings, DACRS and heat shields are employed to cut down emissions. The design process is shown step by step for design and performance evaluation of the combustor.

The performance of this combustor is predicted, it shows that NOx emissions could be reduced by 60%-90% as compared with conventional single annular combustors.

The following paper presents detailed aerodynamic data of a Scottish Aviation Bulldog light aircraft. The data is taken from the pre-stall region of the aircraft flight envelope through two flight test methods and from a geometrically accurate computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of the full scale aircraft, which was meshed in Ansys ICEM CFD and solved in Ansys Fluent. The fidelity of the CFD model was achieved by development of a CATIA solid model with surfaces matching a spatial point cloud of the aircraft taken using a 3D laser scanner. Following a CFD verification process, a 3·4m hybrid mesh with a Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model was found to give the best overall lift and drag characteristics. Further detailed comparisons with the glide flight test data showed the CFD drag polar to have 63% lower zero lift drag, although this discrepancy was related to the simplification of the original CATIA surface model, which excluded the undercarriage, aerials and other protuberance drags. Inclusion of estimates of these sources of drag resulted in a match in zero lift drag to within 15% and a maximum lift to drag of 10:1 which was within 11% of the glide flight test result. The remaining drag discrepancy is attributed to other effects including trim drag and the surface finish of the actual aircraft.