Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T05:50:46.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wake vortex prediction and detection utilising advanced fusion filter technologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

M. Steen
Affiliation:
Institute of Flight Guidance, Technische Universitaet Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
P. Hecker
Affiliation:
Institute of Flight Guidance, Technische Universitaet Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany

Abstract

As a consequence of its aerodynamic lift, each aircraft is generating wake vortices that can become a serious hazard for the succeeding aircraft and in the worst case lead to loss of control. Separation standards were introduced to prevent dangerous wake encounters that have proven sufficiently safe but also very conservative, thus limiting airspace and airport capacity.

The objective of contemporary wake vortex research is regaining capacity in favourable atmospheric conditions, at the same time preserving or even improving the current safety level. The wake vortex advisory systems developed for this purpose are nearing experimental implementation and all include a forecasting component and additional online detection sensors, with both elements having their benefits and limitations.

The wake vortex research objectives at the Institute of Flight Guidance (IFF) of the Technische Universitaet Braunschweig focus on a close coupling approach between model predictions and sensor measurements. Using the complementary capabilities of each, the aim of improved performance of the overall system shall be reached.

After giving a short overview on the wake vortex phenomenon and current approaches to wake vortex alerting and advisory systems, this paper will introduce the fusion concept. The benefits of this approach will be demonstrated by means of examples. An outlook on further development and envisaged advanced implementation concepts will be given.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Icao Doc 4444 PANS-ATM 15th ed 2007, 4, Paragraph 4.9.1.Google Scholar
2. Robins, R. and Delisi, D. NWRA AVOSS Wake Vortex Prediction Algorithm Version 3.1.1, NASA/CR-2002-211746, 2002, Hampton, Virginia, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.Google Scholar
3. Holzaepfel, F. et al The wake vortex prediction and monitoring system WSVBS Part I: Design, The DLR project Wirbelschleppe: Detecting, characterizing, controlling, attenuating, understanding, and predicting aircraft wake vortices, DLR research report 2008-15, 2008, pp 7388.Google Scholar
4. Gerz, T. The wake vortex prediction and monitoring system WSVBS Part II: Performance and ATC integration at Frankfurt airport, The DLR project Wirbelschleppe: Detecting, characterizing, controlling, attenuating, understanding, and predicting aircraft wake vortices, DLR research report 2008-15, 2008, pp 89106.Google Scholar
5. van BAREN, G., Speijker, L. and Frech, M. Increased arrival capacity through the use of the ATC-Wake separation mode planner, Proc of 6th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference (ATIO), 2006.Google Scholar
6. Steen, M. et al Continuity and integrity aspects of an integrated GBAS/INS navigation system, Proc of ION GNSS 21st International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division, 2008.Google Scholar
7. Steen, M. et al Flight testing and data evaluation of MEMS INS/GPS hybridisation filters – first results, Proc of ION GNSS 21st International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division, 2008.Google Scholar
8. Bestmann, U. and Steen, M. et al Comparison of state and error state INS coupling filter based on real flight data, Proc of ION GNSS 20th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division, 2007.Google Scholar
9. Proctor, F. and Hamilton, D. Evaluation of fast-time wake vortex prediction models, Proc of 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 2009.Google Scholar
10. De Visscher, I., Winckelmans, G., Desenfans, O. and Lonfils, T. Overview of UCL operational tools for predicting aircraft wake vortex transport and decay: the Deterministic/Probabilistic wake Vortex Models (DVM/PVM) and the WAKE4D platform, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, Universite catholique de Louvain (UCL), 2008.Google Scholar
11. Holzaepfel, F. Probabilistic two-phase wake vortex decay and transport model, J Aircraft, 40, 2003, pp 323331.Google Scholar
12. Holzaepfel, F. Probabilistic two-phase aircraft wake vortex model: further development and assessment, J Aircraft, 2006, 43, pp 700708.Google Scholar
13. Holzaepfel, F. et al Strategies for circulation evaluation of aircraft wake vortices measured by Lidar, J Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2003, 20, pp 11831195.Google Scholar
14. Holzaepfel, F. and Steen, M. Aircraft wake vortex evolution in ground proximity: analysis and parameterization, J Aircraft, 2007, 45, pp 218227.Google Scholar
15. Frech, M. and Holzaepfel, F. Skill of an aircraft wake vortex model using weather prediction and observation, J Aircraft, 2008, 45, pp 461470.Google Scholar
16. Zarchan, P. and Musoff, H. Fundamentals of Kalman filtering: A practical approach, Progress in astronautics and aeronautics, 208, AIAA, Reston, 2005.Google Scholar
17. Brown, R.G. and Hwang, P.Y.C. Introduction to Random Signals and Applied Kalman Filtering, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1997.Google Scholar