Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T20:16:45.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structural health monitoring technology for a full-scale aircraft structure under changing temperature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

D. Gao ,
Y. Wang ,
Z. Wu  and
G. Rahim
D. Gao*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology, China
Y. Wang*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology, China
Z. Wu*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology, China
G. Rahim*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology, China
*
dongyue2006@mail.dlut.edu.cn
wangys@dlut.edu.cn
wuzhj@dlut.edu.cn
r_gorgin@mail.dlut.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents optimal operating modes for the factors to maximise the detection capability of a given SHM technology in service environment. Firstly, an orthogonal experiment was performed to determine the importance ranking of the influence factors. Through the test, it is found that operating temperatures for SHM hardware and excitation frequencies for PZT actuator were the most critical factors. Then, numerical model of Lamb waves generated and received by PZT sensors were presented to predict the distribution of response signal amplitudes under changing temperature. Verification tests were carried out on a glass fibre reinforced composite plate at different temperatures. The comparison between the analytical prediction and test results was presented and temperature-dependent optimal frequencies for PZT actuators were obtained. Finally, SHM experiments of full-scale horizontal composite structures are presented. The detection capability of the SHM technology applications of aircrafts in real world is verified by the experimental results.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 118 , Issue 1210 , December 2014 , pp. 1519 - 1537
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Diamanti, K. and Soutis, C. Structural health monitoring techniques for aircraft composite structures, Prog Aerosp Sci, 2010, 46, pp 342–52.Google Scholar
2. Qing, X.P., Beard, S.J., Kumar, A. and Hannum, R. A real-time active smart patch system for monitoring the integrity of bonded repair on an aircraft structure, Smart Materials and Structures, 2006, 15, p N66.Google Scholar
3. Ihn, J.B. and Chang, F.K. Detection and monitoring of hidden fatigue crack growth using a built-in piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: I, Diagnostics Smart Materials and Structures, 2004, 13, p 609.Google Scholar
4. Giurgiutiu, V., Lin, B., Santoni-Bottai, G. and Cuc, A. Space application of piezoelectric wafer active sensors for structural health monitoring, J Intel Mat Syst Str, 2011, 22, pp 1359–70.Google Scholar
5. Kessler, S.S., Spearing, S.M. and Soutis, C. Damage detection in composite materials using Lamb wave methods, Smart Materials and Structures, 2002, 11, p 269.Google Scholar
6. Zhou, C., Su, Z. and Cheng, L. Probability-based diagnostic imaging using hybrid features extracted from ultrasonic Lamb wave signals, Smart Materials and Structures, 2011, 20, pp 125005.Google Scholar
7. Qing, X.P., Chan, H.L., Beard, S.J. and Kumar, A. An active diagnostic system for structural health monitoring of rocket engines, J Intel Mat Syst Str, 2006, 17, pp 619–28.Google Scholar
8. Croxford, A.J., Wilcox, P.D., Konstantinidis, G. and Drinkwater, B.W. Strategies for overcoming the effect of temperature on guided wave structural health monitoring, 2007, 14th International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials & Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring: International Society for Optics and Photonics, p 65321T.Google Scholar
9. Clarke, T., Simonetti, F. and Cawley, P. Guided wave health monitoring of complex structures by sparse array systems: infuence of temperature changes on performance, J Sound Vib, 2010, 329, pp 2306–22.Google Scholar
10. Raghavan, A. and Cesnik, C.E. 2008 Effects of elevated temperature on guided-wave structural health monitoring, J Intel Mat Syst Str, 19, pp 1383–98.Google Scholar
11. Michaels, J.E., Lee, S.J., Michaels, T.E., Thompson, D.O. and Chimenti, D.E. Impact of applied loads on guided wave structural health monitoring, 2011, AIP Conference Proceedings-American Institute of Physics, p 1515.Google Scholar
12. Lu, Y. and Michaels, J.E. A methodology for structural health monitoring with diffuse ultrasonic waves in the presence of temperature variations, Ultrasonics, 2005, 43, pp 717–731.Google Scholar
13. Mazzeranghi, A. and Vangi, D. Methodology for minimizing effects of temperature in monitoring with the acousto-ultrasonic technique, Exp Mech, 1999, 39, pp 86–91.Google Scholar
14. Weaver, R.L. and Lobkis, O.I. Temperature dependence of diffuse field phase, Ultrasonics, 2000, 38, pp 491–4.Google Scholar
15. Konstantinidis, G., Wilcox, P.D. and Drinkwater, B.W. An investigation into the temperature stability of a guided wave structural health monitoring system using permanently attached sensors, Sensors Journal, 2007, IEEE, 7, pp 905–12.Google Scholar
16. Salamone, S., Bartoli, I., Di Scalea, F.L. and Coccia, S. Guided-wave health monitoring of aircraft composite panels under changing temperature, J Intel Mat Syst Str, 2009, 20, pp 1079–90.Google Scholar
17. Giurgiutiu, V., Xu, B. and Liu, W. Development and testing of high-temperature piezoelectric wafer active sensors for extreme environments, Structural Health Monitoring, 2010, 9, pp 513–25.Google Scholar
18. Gao, D., Wang, Y., Wu, Z., Rahim, G. and Bai, S. Design of a sensor network for structural health monitoring of a full-scale composite horizontal tail, Smart Materials and Structures, 2014, 23, p 55011.Google Scholar
19. Kundu, A.K. Aircraft Design, 2010, 27, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
20. Howe, D. Aircraft Loading and Structural Layout, 2004, Professional Engineering Publishing.Google Scholar
21. Pell, R., Athiniotis, N. and Clark, G. Fracture of composites in military aircraft, ECF16, 2013.Google Scholar
22. Flansburg, B.D. and Engelstad, S.P. Structural reliability analysis of the advanced composite cargo aircraft, 2013.Google Scholar
23. Giurgiutiu, V. Tuned Lamb wave excitation and detection with piezoelectric wafer active sensors for structural health monitoring, J Intel Mat Syst Str, 2005, 16, pp 291–305.Google Scholar
24. Ramadas, C., Balasubramaniam, K., Hood, A., Joshi, M. and Krishnamurthy, C.V. Modelling of attenuation of Lamb waves using Rayleigh damping: Numerical and experimental studies, Compos Struct, 2011, 93, pp 2020–5.Google Scholar
25. Sherrit, S., Yang, G., Wiederick, H.D. and Mukherjee, B.K. Temperature dependence of the dielectric, elastic and piezoelectric material constants of lead zirconate titanate ceramics, 1999, International Conference on Smart Materials, Structures and Systems, pp 7–10.Google Scholar
26. Karbhari, V.M., Rivera, J. and Zhang, J. Low-temperature hygrothermal degradation of ambient cured E-glass/vinylester composites, J Appl Polym Sci, 2002, 86, pp 2255–2260.Google Scholar
27 Wang, D., Ye, L., Su, Z., Lu, Y., Li, F. and Meng, G. Probabilistic damage identifcation based on correlation analysis using guided wave signals in aluminum plates, Structural Health Monitoring, 2010, 9, pp 133–44.Google Scholar