Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T11:25:02.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Status and perspectives of laminar flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

G. Schrauf
G. Schrauf*
Affiliation:
Airbus, Bremen, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

After identifying the ecological and economic drivers for use of laminar flow technology, we outline the mechanisms of laminarturbulent boundary layer transition and review the status of natural laminar flow (NLF) and hybrid laminar flow control (HLFC). New ways to reduce the complexity of HLFC systems are presented, and the remaining steps to achieve technology readiness are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 109 , Issue 1102 , December 2005 , pp. 639 - 644
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2005 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Group of Personalities. European Aeronautics: A Vision for 2020, January 2001, European Commission. http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/growth/aeronautics2020/en/.Google Scholar
2. Pfenninger, W.. Some results from the X21 program. Part I: Flow phenomena at the leading edge of swept wings, Recent Developments in Boundary Layer Research, Part IV, May 1965. AGARDograf 97.Google Scholar
3. Poll, D.I.A.. Some observations of the transition process on the windward face of a long yawed cylinder, J Fluid Mech, 1985, 150, pp 329–356.Google Scholar
4. Schrauf, G.. Evaluation of the A320 hybrid laminar fin experiment, 2000, CD-ROM Proceedings of ECCOMAS 2000, 11–14 September 2000, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
5. Gaster, M.. A simple device for preventing turbulent contamination of swept leading edges, Aeronaut J, November 1965, 69, pp 788–789.Google Scholar
6. Gaster, M.. On the flow along swept leading edges, Aeronaut J, 1965, 69, p 788.Google Scholar
7. Gray, W.E., The Nature of the Boundary Layer Flow at the Nose of a Swept Wing, 1952, RAE Technical Memorandum No Aero 256.Google Scholar
8. Owen, P.R. and Randall, D.G., Boundary Layer Transition on a Sweptback Wing, 1952, RAE Technical Memorandum No Aero 277 and 1953, RAE Technical Memorandum No Aero 330.Google Scholar
9. Tollmien, W.. Über die Entstehung der Turbulenz, 1. Mitteilung, Nachr Ges Wiss Göttingen, Math Phys Klasse, 1929, pp 21–44. English translation: NACA-TM-609, 1931.Google Scholar
10. Schubauer, G.B. and Skramstad, H.K.. Laminar boundary-layer oscillations stability of laminar flow, J Aero Sci, 1947, 14, (2), pp 69–78.Google Scholar
11. Arnal, D.. Boundary layer transition. Predictions based on linear theory, April 1994, Special Course on Progress in Transition Modelling, AGARD Report 793.Google Scholar
12. Schrauf, G.. Large-scale laminar-flow tests evaluated with linear stability theory, AIAA J Aircr, 2004, 41, (2), pp 224–230.Google Scholar
13. Humphreys, B., Preliminary Rain Erosion Tests of Candidate Materials for a Hybrid Laminar Flow Nacelle, January 2000, HYLDA Technical Report 38.Google Scholar
14. Henke, R.. A320 HLF fin flight tests completed, Air&Space Europe, 1999, 1, (2), pp 76–79.Google Scholar
15. Lajaine, H., Construction of an HLF Nose for a Vertical Fin, April 2003, ALTTA Technical Report 81.Google Scholar
16. Schrauf, G.H. and Hortsmann, K.H.. Simplified hybrid laminar flow control, 2004, CD-Proceedings Volume II, ECCOMAS 2004, Fourth European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Engineering, 24–28 July 2004, Jyväskylä, Finland.Google Scholar