Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:59:09.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shockwaves in the rotor world — a personal perspective of 30 years of rotor aerodynamic developments in the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

P. G. Wilby
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Tonight we commemorate the achievements of Juan de la Cierva, the great pioneer of rotary aviation. His development of the autogyro stimulated the development of the early rotor theories and paved the way for the modern helicopter. In turning the autogyro into a practical aircraft, Cierva proved to be an innovator prepared to take an unconventional approach. He was at the same time pragmatic in that he really wanted to build a helicopter but realised that the required technology was not yet mature, and settled on the autogyro as representing what was an achievable concept. His concept was thus unconventional, dramatic and achievable — an admirable combination. However, in his first attempts to fly an autogyro he rapidly came up against the problem that faces all rotory wing designers — which is that the advancing blade has a much greater lifting potential than the retreating blade, due to the difference in dynamic head. This led him to introduce the flapping hinge that allowed the rotor to achieve roll balance as well as providing the backward tilt of the rotor that is necessary for autorotation. Having made this step forward, he realised that the introduction of blade camber would allow the retreating blade to achieve higher angles of incidence before stalling, but in so doing he built in a potentially dangerous control characteristic.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 102 , Issue 1013 , March 1998 , pp. 113 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wilby, P.G. and Grant, J. Transonic aerodynamics and the helicopter rotor, Proceedings of IUTAM Symposium — Symposium Transsonicum II — Güttingen, Sept 1975, Springer-Verlag 1976.Google Scholar
2. Beavan, J.A. and Lock, C.N.H. The effect of blade twist on the characteristics of the C.30 Autogyro, ARC R & M NO 1727, April 1936.Google Scholar
3. Hufton, P.A., Woodward Nutt, A.E., Bigg, F.J. and Beavan, J.A. General investigation into the characteristics of the C.30 Autogyro, ARC R&M NO 1859, March 1939.Google Scholar
4. Pearcey, H.H., Wilby, P.G., Riley, M.J. and Brotherhood, P. The derivation and verification of a new rotor profile on the basis of flow phenomena, aerofoil research and flight tests, Proceedings of the Aerodynamics of Rotary Wings Conference, AGARD 111, Marseilles, Sept 1972.Google Scholar
5. Brotherhood, P. and Riley, M.J. Flight experiments on aerodynamic features affecting helicopter blade design, 3rd European Rotorcraft and Powered Lift Aircraft Forum, Aix-en-Provence, Sept 1977.Google Scholar
6. Grant, J. The prediction of supercritical pressure distributions on blade tips of arbitrary shape over a range of advancing blade azimuth angles, 4th European Rotorcraft and Powered Lift Aircraft Forum, Stresa, Sept 1978.Google Scholar
7. Cook, C.V. Flight evaluation of a highly cambered tail rotor, 2nd European Rotorcraft and Powered Lift Aircraft Forum, Buckeburg, Sept 1976.Google Scholar
8. Wilby, P.G. The aerodynamic characteristics of some new RAE blade sections and their potential influence on rotor performance, 5th European Rotorcraft Forum, Amsterdam, Sept 1979.Google Scholar
9. Wilby, P.G., Riley, M.J. and Miller, J. Some unsteady aerodynamic effects on helicopter rotors, 7th European Rotorcraft Forum, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Sept 1981.Google Scholar
10. Beddoes, T.S. Representation of aerofoil behaviour, Vertica, 1983, 7, (2), pp 183–197.Google Scholar
11. Beddoes, T.S. Two and three dimensional indicial method for rotor dynamic airloads, Proceedings of the AHS National Specialists Meeting on Rotorcraft Dynamics, Arlington, Texas, Nov 1989.Google Scholar
12. Wilby, P.G. An experimental investigation of the influence of a range of aerofoil design features on dynamic stall onset, 10th European Rotor-craft Forum, Amsterdam, Sept 1984.Google Scholar
13. Wilby, P.G. The development of rotor aerofoil testing in the UK — the creation of a capability to exploit a design opportunity, 22nd European Rotorcraft Forum, Brighton, Sept 1996.Google Scholar
14. Wilby, P.G. and Philippe, J-J. An investigation of the aerodynamics of an RAE swept tip using a model rotor, 8th European Rotorcraft Forum, Aix-en-Provence, Sept 1982.Google Scholar
15. Riley, M.J. and Miller, J. Pressure distributions on a helicopter swept tip from flight and from calculation, 9th European Rotorcraft Forum, Stresa, Sept 1983.Google Scholar
16. Riley, M.J. Measurement of the performance of a helicopter swept tip rotor in flight, 12th European Rotorcraft Forum, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Sept 1986.Google Scholar
17. Perry, F.J. Aerodynamics of the Helicopter World Speed Record, 43rd Annual National Forum of the AHS, May 1987.Google Scholar
18. Hansford, R. Rotor load correlation with the British Experimental Rotor Programme blade, AHS J, July 1987.Google Scholar
19. Markiewicz, R.H. et al, An experimental programme for the DRA Mach scaled model rotor test rig, 22nd European Rotorcraft Forum, Brighton, Sept 1996.Google Scholar
20. Pike, A.C. and Harrison, R.J. Helicopter noise measurements at high advancing blade Mach number — a novel approach to full scale flight testing AHS North East Region Aeromechanics Specialists Meeting, 11-13 Oct 1995.Google Scholar