Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Runway conflict alerting: advisory or directive?

  • A. Sammut (a1) and D. Zammit Mangion (a1) (a2)

Abstract

Runway conflicts pose a significant threat to continued safety in commercial aviation. In recent years, stakeholders have initiated a number of programmes dealing with the issue of runway incursions, with the majority adopting traditional advisory alerting techniques. In contrast, this work proposes the use of directive cockpit alerting, which provides both an alert of the conflict as well as guidance on which manoeuvre to conduct to clear the conflict. This article reports the findings of simulator trials that have been conducted to assess the effectiveness and acceptability of a directive alerting strategy within the context of runway incursions. Statistical analysis performed on the quantitative measures taken from the evaluations have shown that the directive mode of alerting leads to a higher probability of the crew performing the correct action when faced with an alert. This, together with overall participant acceptance of the directive alerting concept, is a strong indicator that the technique has the potential of providing a complete solution to the problem of runway incursions.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
1. United States Federal Aviation Administration. Runway Safety Report – Published Yearly. Statistical report, United States Federal Aviation Administration, Washington DC, USA, 2001-2010.
2. NTSB. Most Wanted Safety Transportation Safety Improvements. United States National Transportation Safety Board, Washington DC, USA, 2007.
3. Advisory Council for Aeronautics Research in Europe. Strategic Research Agenda SRA – Volume 1. Technical report, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003.
4. International Civil Aviation Organization. Manual on the Prevention of Runway Incursions. Technical Report DOC9870, 2007.
5. International Civil Aviation Organization. Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control Systems Manual (A-SMGCS). Technical Report DOC9830, 2004.
6. Jain, A. Airport Surface Monitoring and Runway Incursion Warning System. United States Patent 5,629,691, 1997.
7. Smithley, D.L. Runway Incursion Detection and Warning System. United States Patent 6,486,825, 2002.
8. Mallet, R. and Calzetta, R. Surface Traffic Movement System and Method. United States Patent 6,920,390, 2005.
9. Cassell, R., Evers, C., Esche, J. and Sleep, B. NASA Runway Incursion Prevention System (RIPS) Dallas-Fort Worth Demonstration Performance Analysis. Technical Report NASA/CR-2002-211677, Rannoch Corporation, 2002.
10. Green, D. Jr Runway Safety Monitor Algorithm for Runway Incursion Detection and Alerting. Technical Report NASA/CR-2002-211416, Lockheed Martin Corporation, 2002.
11. Cassell, R., Evers, C., Esche, J. and Sleep, B. PATHPROX – A Runway Incursion Alerting System. In The IEEE 19th Annual Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2, pp 7D3/1 – 7D3/6, 2000.
12. Cassell, R., Evers, C., Esche, J. and Sleep, B. Initial Test Results of PathProx – A Runway Incursion Alerting System. In The IEEE 20th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 1, pp 2D3/1–2D3/7, Oct 2001.
13. Cassell, R., Evers, C. and Esche, J. Safety Benefits of PathProx – A Runway Incursion Alerting System. In The IEEE 22nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2, pp 9.B.4-91-10, October 2003.
14. Timmerman, J. Runway Incursion Prevention System ADS-B and DGPS Data Link Analysis Dallas Fort Worth International Airport. Technical Report NASA/CR-2001-211242, Rockwell Collins, 2001.
15. Jones, D.R. Runway Incursion Prevention System Simulation Evaluation. In IEEE 21st Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2, pp 11B4-1-12, 2002.
16. Vernaleken, C., Urvoy, C. and Klingauf, U. Simulator Evaluation of a Novel Surface Movement Awareness and Alerting System (SMAAS) for Runway Incursion Avoidance. In The 26th Congress of International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, 2008.
17. Woodell, D.L. Runway Obstacle Detection System and Method. United States Patent 6,850,185 B1, 2005.
18. Corcoran, J.J. III Incursion Alerting System. United States Patent 6,606,563 B2, 2003.
19. Khatwa, R., Johnson, M.A., Poe, J.J., Conner, K.J. and Corcoran, J.J. III Ground Runway Awareness and Advisory System. United States Patent 7,117,089 B2, 2006.
20. Honeywell Runway Awareness and Alerting System Added to Airbus Catalog – (Online Press Release). http://honeywell.com/News/Pages/07.14.08RAASAddedtoAirbusCatalog.aspx, 2008. (Cited July 2010).
21. Conner, K.J., Gremmert, R., Ishihara, Y., Khatwa, R., Poe, J.J. and Corcoran, J.J. III Ground Operations and Imminent Landing Runway Selection. United States Patent 7,206,698 B2, 2007.
22. Campbell, R.D. and Bagshaw, M. Human Performance and Limitations in Aviation, Third Edition, pp 99114. Blackwell Science Ltd, 2002. ISBN 0-632-05965-6.
23. Foxworth, T.G. and Marthinsen, H.F. Another Look at Accelerate-Stop Criteria. Technical report, Air Line Pilots Association, 1969.
24. Edworthy, J. Warning Design: A Research Perspective, 1996, pp 129139. CRC Press. ISBN 0-748-40090-7.
25. Peryer, G., Noyes, J. and Pleydell-Pearce, K. Auditory alert characteristics: A survey of pilot views, The Int J Aviation Psychology, 2005, 15, pp 233250.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed