Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Remote operation and monitoring of a micro aero gas turbine

  • M. Diakostefanis (a1), T. Nikolaidis (a1), S. Sampath (a1) and T. Triantafyllou (a1)

Abstract

Internet applications have been extended to various aspects of everyday life and offer services of high reliability and security at relatively low cost. This project presents the design of a reliable, safe and secure software system for real-time remote operation and monitoring of an aero gas turbine with utilisation of existing internet technology, whilst the gas turbine is installed in a remote test facility

This project introduces a capability that allows remote and flexible operation of an aero gas turbine throughout the whole operational envelope, as required by the user at low cost, by exploiting the available Internet technology. Remote operation of the gas turbine can be combined with other remote Internet applications to provide very powerful gas-turbine performance-simulation experimental platforms and real-time performance monitoring tools, whilst keeping the implementation cost at low levels.

The gas turbine used in this experiment is an AMT Netherlands Olympus micro gas turbine and a spiral model approach was applied for the software. The whole process was driven by risk mitigation.

The outcome is a fully functional software application that enables remote operation of the micro gas turbine whilst constantly monitors the performance of the engine according to basic gas turbine control theory. The application is very flexible, as it runs with no local installation requirements and includes provisions for expansion and collaboration with other online performance simulation and diagnostic tools.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Footnotes

Hide All

This paper will be presented at the ISABE 2017 Conference, 3-8 September 2017, Manchester, UK.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
1. Lufthansa Technik. manage/m Technical Operations Suite, 2016. Available at: www.manage-m.com/managem_page_about.
2. Siemens The Benchmark in Controls – Technical Highlights Siemens Power Plant Automation™ – SPPA-T3000, 2016. Available at: www.energy.siemens.com/hq/pool/hq/automation/automation-control-pg/sppa-t3000/T3-B-ContrSys-us-V11.pdf.
3. Ko, C.C., Chen, B.M., Jianping, C., Zhuang, Y. and Chen, T. K. Development of a web-based laboratory for control experiments on a coupled tank apparatus, IEEE Transactions on Education, 2001, 44, (1), pp 7686.
4. Okajima, H.S.S., Ledel, L.C. Fragnito, H.L. and Rocha, H.V. WebLab development using a Java and Labview integrated solution for Kyatera network, 3rd TIDIA Fapesp Workshop, 15–17 November 2006, Sao Paolo, Brasil, pp 204.
5. Apostolidis, A., Sampath, S., Laskaridis, P. and Singh, R. WebEngine - A web-based gas turbine performance simulation tool, Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2013 GT2013, Vol. 4, June 3–7, 2013, ASME, New York, New York, US, pp. V004T08A007.
6. AMT Netherlands. Olympus AMT Netherlands gas turbine, 2014. Available at: http://www.amtjets.com/index.php.
7. AMT Netherlands, Olympus Manual, Geldrop, 2001, Netherlands.
8. Sommerville, I. Software Engineering, 8th ed., 2006, Pearson Education, GB.
9. Boehm, B.W. A spiral model of software development and enhancement, Computer, 1988, 21, (5), pp 6172.
10. Gallina, B. and Guelfi, N. A template for requirement elicitation of dependable product lines, Sawyer, P., Paech, B. and Heymans, P. (Eds.) Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality, 2007, Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp 6377.
11. Broy, M. Seamless model driven systems engineering based on formal models. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods: Formal Methods and Software Engineering (ICFEM '09), Breitman, K. and Cavalcanti, A. (Eds.). 2009. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 1–19. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10373-5_1.
12. Hayhurst, K.J., Veerhusen, D.S., Chilenski, J.J. and Rierson, L.K. NASA/TM-2001-210 - A Practical Tutorial on Modified Condition/Decision Coverage, 2001, NASA, Hampton, Virginia, US.
13. Hilderman, V. and Baghi, T. Avionics certification: a complete guide to DO-178 (software), DO-254 (hardware), 2007, Avionics Communications, Leesburg, Virginia, US.
14. Ameur, Y.A., Boniol, F. and Wiels, V. Toward a wider use of formal methods for aerospace systems design and verification, Int J Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 2010, 12, (1), pp 17.
15. Berard, B., Bidoit, M., Finkel, A., Laroussinie, F., Petit, A., Petrucci, L. and Schnoebelen, P. Systems and Software Verification: Model-Checking Techniques and Tools, 1st ed, 2010, Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, New York, US.
16. Li, W. Risk Assessment of Power Systems: Models, Methods, and Applications, 2005, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, US.
17. Gokhale, S. S. and Trivedi, K.S. Reliability prediction and sensitivity analysis based on software architecture, Software Reliability Engineering, 2002. ISSRE 2003. Proceedings. 13th International Symposium on, 2002, pp 64.
18. Clarke, P.J., Power, J.F., Babich, D. and King, T.M., A testing strategy for abstract classes, Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, 2012, 22, (3), pp 147169.
19. British Standards Institution, (2007), BS EN 61025:2007 - Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), British Standards Online. Available at: https://bsol.bsigroup.com/Bibliographic/BibliographicInfoData/000000000030101041. Accessed May 2017.
20. British Standards Institution, (2001), BS IEC 61882:2001 - Hazard and operability studies (HAZOP studies). Application guide, British Standards Online. Available at: https://bsol.bsigroup.com/Bibliographic/BibliographicInfoData/000000000030031511. Accessed May 2017.
21. Fullwood, R. Probabilistic Safety Assessment in the Chemical and Nuclear Industries, 1999, Butterworth-Heinemann, UK.
22. Hignett, K.C. Practical Safety and Reliability Assessment, 1996, E & FN Spon, London.
23. Stamatelatos, M. Fault Tree Handbook with Aerospace Applications, 2002, NASA, Washington DC, US. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/codeq/doctree/fthb.pdf ed.
24. British Standards Institution, (2006), BS EN 60812:2006 - Analysis techniques for system reliability. Procedure for failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), British Standards Online. Available at: https://bsol.bsigroup.com/Bibliographic/BibliographicInfoData/000000000030101028. Accessed May 2017.
25. Jaw, L.C. and Mattingly, J.D. Aircraft engine controls: design, system analysis, and health monitoring, 2009, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, US.
26. The Apache Software Foundation. mod_proxy - Apache HTTP Server, 2016. Available at: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy.html.
27. Heffelfinger, D. Java EE 6 Development with NetBeans 7, 2011, Packt Publishing, Great Britain.
28. Trivedi, K.S. Probability and Statistics with Reliability, Queuing, and Computer Science Applications, 1982, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, US.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed