Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:00:31.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Passenger safety in very large transport aircraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

H. Muir
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, Cranfield University, UK
L. Thomas
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, Cranfield University, UK

Abstract

Emergency evacuation of future very large transport aircraft (VLTA) in the event of a survivable crash poses a challenge for aircraft manufacturers and certification authorities. In addition, the increase in passenger capacity and flight duration associated with such airframes requires that some general cabin safety issues be revisited. Information gained from previous accidents and research has been reviewed with particular regard to VLTAs. This has included consideration of the issues associated with the aircraft configuration, the behaviour and training of the cabin crew, passenger behaviour in emergency situations, and issues relevant to future trends within the industry.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accidents World Wide Operations 1959-2001, 2002.Google Scholar
2. Air Accidents Investigation Branch, Report on the accident to Boeing 737-236 Series 1 G-BGJL at Manchester International Airport on 22 August 1985, Aircraft accident report 8/88, 1988, London: Department of Transport, HMSO.Google Scholar
3. International Civil Aviation Organization, Report on the accident to Boeing 737 C-GQPW at Calgary Airport on 22 March 1984 Summary 1984-2, Montreal, Canada, 1984, International Civil Aviation Organization.Google Scholar
4. World Airline Accident Summary CAP 479, Report on the accident to Boeing 737-N388US at Los Angeles Airport on 1 February 1991, Civil Aviation Authority.Google Scholar
5. Muir, H., Marrison, C. and Evans, A. Aircraft evacuations: the effect of passengers motivation and cabin configuration adjacent to the exit, 1989, CAA Paper 89019, London UK: Civil Aviation Authority.Google Scholar
6. Taylor, P., Hillsborough stadium disaster, Final report on enquiry by Rt Hon Justice Taylor, London, UK, Home Office, HMSO.Google Scholar
7. US Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Regulations Part 25 —Airworthiness Standards, 1974, Washington DC.Google Scholar
8. UK Civil Aviation Authority JAR 25 — Large aeroplanes, 1978, London.Google Scholar
9. NTSB Safety Study, Emergency evacuation of commercial airplanes, Ref NTSB/SS-00/01, PB2000-917002 Notation 7266, June 2000.Google Scholar
10. Civil Aviation Authority Airworthiness Notice 64, Minimum space for seated passengers, Issue 1, 16 March 1989.Google Scholar
11. Quigley, C., Southall, D., Freer, M., Moody, A. and Porter, M., Anthropometric study to update minimum aircraft seating standards, 2001, Report prepared for the Joint Aviation Authorities.Google Scholar
12. Muir, H.C. and Cobbett, A.M., Cabin crew behaviour in emergency evacuations, 1995, Civil Aviation Authority/Federal Aviation Administration Paper DOT/FAA/CT-95/16.Google Scholar
13. Federal Aviation Administration, Emergency evacuation slides, ramps, ramp/slides and slide/rafts, Technical standard order C69c, 18 August 1999.Google Scholar
14. Hynes, M.K. Frequency and costs of transport airplane precautionary emergency evacuations, 1999, DOT/FAA/AM-99/30, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
15. Hynes, M.K. Evacuee injuries and demographics in transport airplane precautionary emergency evacuations, 2000, DOT/FAA/AM-00/11, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
16. Gosling, P.D. A new philosophy applied to the design of pneumatic aircraft evacuation slides and slide-rafts, 1998, Very large transport airplane conference, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, October 1998.Google Scholar
17. NTSB Flight attendant training and performance during emergency situations, 1992, Special investigation report NTSB/SIR-92-02, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
18. US Department of Transportation Federal aviation regulations Part 121 —Operating requirements.Google Scholar
19. Caird, J.K., Wheat, B., Mcintosh, K.R. and Dewar, R.E., The comprehensibility of airline safety card pictorials, 1997, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting, 22-26 September 1997, Alberquerque, NM.Google Scholar
20. Thomas, L.J., Precautionary emergency evacuations: is it better to be safe and sorry?, 2000, Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 1, (1), pp 99101.Google Scholar
21. Thomas, L.J., Muir, H.C. and Niazi, F. Preliminary evaluation of an electroluminescent floor proximity emergency escape path marking system (FPEEPMS) incorporating tactile cues, 2001, Cranfield University.Google Scholar
22. Rutherford, P. and Withington, D.J., Sound location for aiding emergency egress, Fire Safety Engineering, 1998. 5, pp 1417.Google Scholar