Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T10:14:15.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Numerical and experimental investigations on the reduction of wind tunnel wall interference by means of adaptive slots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

O. Meyer
Affiliation:
Institute of Aero- and Astronautics, Technical University Berlin, Germany
W. Nitsche
Affiliation:
Institute of Aero- and Astronautics, Technical University Berlin, Germany
I. Futterer
Affiliation:
Fluent Germany, Darmstadt, Germany

Abstract

The flow in many wind tunnel experiments is affected by the presence of test section walls. The resulting interference can be minimised by correcting the measured model pressures, or by influencing the model flow directly with the use of ventilated or adaptive test section walls. The objective behind the latter technique is to guide the flow in the test section to achieve low interference (i.e. free flow) condition at the model. The most successful technique of flexible, adaptive walls is still restricted to small research wind tunnels due to its mechanical complexity. However, a very promising alternative is the use of adaptive slots in the test section walls. This concept combines the method of passive slotted walls, as they are already implemented in many large wind tunnels, and flexible walls. Additionally, this technique presents the opportunity of full 3D adaptations because the slots can be situated in all four test section walls.

This paper presents preliminary experimental results and the latest numerical calculations on the effectiveness of adaptive slots. The experiments were conducted under high subsonic flow conditions in the new slotted test section of the transonic wind tunnel at TU Berlin’s Aeronautical Institute (ILR).

The numerical results presented are focussed on the 2D slot adaptation of a 2D-model (CAST7 aerofoil) and the 3D slot adaptation of a body of revolution (3D-ETB). In addition, basic studies were made of the flows associated with a single slot on one wall and a bump on the other.

The numerical and the first experimental investigations have shown the potential of adaptive slots to reduce wall interferences effectively. The adaptation accuracy of the investigated slot configurations deviated not more than 3% from the reference case (2D-wall adaptation).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ewald, B.R.F. Wind tunnel wall corrections, 1998, AGARD-AG-336.Google Scholar
2. Wolf, S.W.D. Adaptive wall technology for improved wind tunnel testing techniques — a review, Prog Aerospace Sci, 1995,31, S.85136.Google Scholar
3. Amecke, J. Direkte Berechnung von Wandinterferenzen und Wandadaption bei zweidimensionaler Strömung in Windkanälen mit geschlossenen Wänden, 1985, DFVLR-FB 85-62.Google Scholar
4. Holst, H. Verfahren zur Bestimmung von dreidimensionalen Wind-kanalwandinterferenzen und Wandadaptionen mit Hilfe gemessener Wanddrücke bei kompressibler Unterschallstromung, 1990, DLR-FB-90-46.Google Scholar
5. TASCflow User Documentation, Advanced Scientific Computing, Version 2.4, 1995.Google Scholar
6. Futterer, I. Numerische Untersuchung zum Einsatz adaptiver Schlitze zur Minimierung von Windkanalwandinterferenzen bei kompressiblen Unterschallströmungen, 2000, dissertation, TU Berlin.Google Scholar
7. Quest, J., Nitsche, W. and Mignosi, A. Adaptive slots: an alternative concept to reduce wall interferences, 1996, AGARD-CP-585.Google Scholar
8. Nitsche, W., Wallbruch, I. and Quest, J. Einsatzmoglichkeiten adaptiver Schlitze zur Verringerung von Wandinterferenzen, 1997, DGLR-JT97 123, München.Google Scholar
9. Meyer, O., Futterer, I. and Nitsche, W. Numerische und experimentelle Untersuchungen zum Einsatz adaptiver Schlitze in Wind-kanalmeßstrecken, DGLR-JT2000-91.Google Scholar