Skip to main content Accessibility help

A new wind tunnel for the study of pressure-induced separating and reattaching flows

  • A. Mohammed-Taifour (a1), Q. Schwaab (a1), J. Pioton (a1) and J. Weiss (a1)


The design, construction, and validation of a new academic wind tunnel is described in detail. The wind tunnel is of a classical, blow-down type and generates a pressure-induced, turbulent separation bubble on a flat test surface by a combination of adverse and favorable pressure gradients. The Reynolds number, based on momentum thickness just upstream of separation, is Reθ ≃ 5,000 at a free-stream velocity of Uref = 25ms−1. The length of the separation bubble is estimated at 0°42 ± 0°02m by three different methods. Results of a numerical simulation demonstrate the absence of flow separation in the wind-tunnel contraction. This results in a turbulence level of about 0·05% in the test section. Oil-film visualisation experiments show that the flow near the wall is strongly three-dimensional in the recirculating region and that the topology of the limiting streamlines is consistent with experiments performed on configurations with fixed separation. Finally, spatial variations of the forward-flow fraction have been documented using a thermal-tuft probe and are shown to compare well with the results of the oil-film visualisation.


Corresponding author


Hide All
1.Amitay, M., Pitt, D. and Glezer, A.Separation control in duct flows, J Aircraft, 2002, 39, (4), pp 616620.
2.Barlow, J.B., Rae, W.H. and Pope, A.Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing, John Wiley & Sons, 3rd ed, 1999.
3.Blair, M.F., Bailey, D.A. and Schlinker, R.H. Development of a large-scale wind tunnel for the simulation of turbomachinery airfoil boundary layers, J Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1981, (1034), pp 678687.
4.Bouriga, M, Lemyre-Baron, J.-S. F.Morency, F. and Weiss, J.Preliminary experimental and numerical investigations of the flow in the contraction of a boundary-layer wind tunnel, Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 38, (4), pp 517532.
5.Bouriga, M., Taher, R., Morency, F. and Weiss, J. Numerical investigation of secondary flows in a constant-width wind-tunnel contraction, Aeronaut J (in press), 2015.
6.Bradshaw, P.An introduction to turbulence and its measurement, Pergamon Press, 1971.
7.Bradshaw, P.Two more wind tunnels driven by aerofoil-type centrifugal blowers, Technical report, 72-10, Imperial College of Science and Technology, 1972.
8.Bradshaw, P. and Pankhurst, R.C.The design of low-speed wind tunnels, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1964, 5, pp 169. Brederode, V. and Bradshaw, P.Three-dimensional fow in nominally two-dimensional separation bubbles: I. Flow behind a rearward-facing step, Technical report, 72-19, Imperial College of Science and Technology, 1972.
10.Cattafesta, L., Bahr, C. and Matthew, J.Fundamentals of Wind-Tunnel Design, Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
11.Ciampoli, F. and Hancock, P.E.Effects of fow width in nominally two-dimensional turbulent separated flow, Experiments in Fluids, 2006, 40, pp 196202.
12.Clauser, F.H.Turbulent boundary layers in adverse pressure gradients, J Aeronautical Sciences, 1954, 21, (2), pp 91108.
13.Day, I.J.Stall inception in axial flow compressors, J Turbomachinery, 1993, 115, (1), pp 19.
14.DeGraaff, D.B. and Eaton, J.K.Reynolds-number scaling of the flat-plate turbulent boundary layer, J Fluid Mechanics, 2000, 422, pp 319346.
15.Driver, D.M., Seegmiller, H.L. and Marvin, J.G.Time-dependent behavior of a reattaching shear layer, AIAA J, 1987, 25, (7), pp 914919.
16.Dussauge, J.-P., Dupont, P. and Debiève, J.-F.Unsteadiness in shock wave boundary layer interactions with separation, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2006, 10, (2), pp 8591.
17.Hancock, P.E. and Johnson, A.E.Close spacing of settling chamber screens, Aeronaut J, 1997, 101, (1004), pp 179183.
18.Hucho, W. and Sovran, G.Aerodynamics of road vehicles, Annual review of fluid mechanics, 1993, 25, (1), pp 485537.
19.Bell, J.H. and Metha, R.D.Boundary layer predictions for small low-speed contractions, AIAA J, 1989, 27, (3), pp 372374.
20.Jaroch, M.Oil flow visualization experiments in the separated and reattachment regions of the flow past a transverse flat plate with a long splitter plate, Zeitschrift für Flugwissenschaften und Weltraumforschung, 1987, 11, pp 230236.
21.Johansson, A.V.A Low Speed Wind-Tunnel with Extreme Flow Quality – Design and Tests, pp 16031611, 1992, Proc. 18, bounceth ICAS Congress, Beijing, China.
22.Johnson, A.E. and Hancock, P.E.Some aspects of centrifugal fan characteristics in blower windtunnels, Aeronaut J, 1997, 101, (1010), pp 481485.
23.Kiya, M., Sasaki, K. and Arie, M.Discrete-vortex simulation of a turbulent separation bubble, J Fluid Mechanics, 1982, 120, pp 219244.
24.Lindgren, B. and Johansson, A.V.Evaluation of a new wind tunnel with expanding corners, Experiments in fuids, 2004, 36, (1), pp 197203.
25.Na, Y. and Moin, P.Direct numerical simulation of a separated turbulent boundary layer, J Fluid Mechanics, 1998, 374, pp 379405.
26.Bradshaw, P.The effect of wind tunnel screens on nominally two-dimensional boundary layers, J Fluid Mechanics, 1965, 22, (4), pp 679687.
27.Bradshaw, P and Hellens, G.E. The N.P.L 59in × 9in Boundary-Layer Wind Tunnel, 1966, Aeronautical Research Council, Rep and Mem.
28.Perry, A.E. and Fairlie, B.D.A study of turbulent boundary-layer separation and reattachment, J Fluid Mechanics, 1975, 69, (4), pp 657672.
29.Metha, R.D.The aerodynamic design of blower windtunnels with wide angle diffusers, Prog Aero Sci, 1977, 18, pp 59120.
30.Metha, R.D. and Bradshaw, P.Design rules for small low-speed windtunnels, Aeronaut J, 1979, 83, pp 443449.
31.Rao, D.M. and Kariya, T.T. The Design and Preliminary Calibration of a Boundary-Layer Flow Channel. Technical report, 178399, NASA Contractor Report, 1987.
32.Ruderich, R. and Fernholz, H.H.An experimental investigation of a turbulent shear flow with separation, reverse flow, and reattachment, J Fluid Mechanics, 1986, 163, (1), pp 283322.
33Mokhtari, S. and Bradshaw, P.Longitudinal vortices in wind tunnel wall boundary layers, Aeronaut J, 1983, pp 233236.
34.Sarma, G.R. and Comte-Bellot, G.Automated constant voltage anemometer for measurements with fluid temperature drifts, Review of scientifc instruments, 2002, 73, (3), pp 13131317.
35.Schwaab, Q. and Weiss, J.Evaluation of a thermal-tuft probe for turbulent separating and reattaching flows, ASME J Fluids Engineering, 137, 011401, 2015.
36.Simpson, R.L.Aspects of turbulent boundary-layer separation, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1996, 32, pp 457521.
37.Smits, A.J., McKeon, B.J. and Marusic, I.High-Reynolds number Wall turbulence, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 43, pp 353375.
38.Morel, T.Design of two-dimensional wind tunnel contractions, J Fluids Engineering, 1977, pp 371378.
39.Tavoularis, S.Measurements in Fluid Mechanics, Cambridge, 1st ed, 2005.
40.Patrick, W.P. Flowfield Measurements in a Separated and Reattached Flat Plate Turbulent Boundary Layer. Technical report, NASA Contractor Report 4052, 1987.
41.Weiss, J. and Comte-Bellot, G.Electronic noise in a constant voltage anemometer, Review of Scientific Instruments, 2004, 75, (5), pp 12901296.
42.Wilcox, D.C.Turbulence modeling for CFD, 3, DCW industries La Cañada, 2006.
43.Wood, D.H. and Westphal, R.V.Measurements of the free-stream fluctuations above a turbulent boundary layer, Physics of Fluids, 1988, 31, (10), pp 28342840.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

A new wind tunnel for the study of pressure-induced separating and reattaching flows

  • A. Mohammed-Taifour (a1), Q. Schwaab (a1), J. Pioton (a1) and J. Weiss (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.