Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T06:39:59.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Flight simulator study on the influence of vortex curvature on wake encounter hazard using LES wind fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

D. Vechtel
D. Vechtel*
Affiliation:
DLR German Aerospace Center, Institute of Flight Systems, Department of Flight Dynamics and Simulation, Braunschweig, Germany
*
dennis.vechtel@dlr.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A flight simulator study has been carried out to evaluate the performance of modern flight control systems encountering curved wake vortices. During the decay process the shape of wake vortices alters significantly which has an influence on the encounter characteristics and thus on the encounter hazard. To analyse most realistic wake encounters, flow fields of matured vortices have been generated with large-eddy-simulations. These were used for the determination of induced force and moment histories during the encounter. The force and moment histories have been implemented into the equations of motions of a 6 DoF flight simulation. For the sake of comparison encounters have also been simulated with straight vortices as they were mostly used for many other investigations. The most important goal of the study was to analyse the difference between these ideally straight vortices and vortices with a more realistic shape regarding encounter acceptance. The simulator study was conducted in an A330 motion-based full-flight simulator with pilots-in-the-loop. The analysed scenario was a wake encounter during final approach. The encounter conditions corresponded to a heavy-behind-heavy situation for Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations. The aircraft was flown either manually (in normal law) or with autopilot engaged. Altogether 93 encounters have been simulated, 38 with straight and 55 encounters with curved vortices. For encounters under manual control the simulator study revealed a potential risk of pilot induced oscillations (PIO) during encounters with curved vortices. With autopilot engaged not even one encounter with curved vortices was classified to be unacceptable. Although significant aircraft response was experienced the autopilot never disengaged automatically in any encounter. Altogether about 12 percent of the encounters were not accepted by the pilots. This is indeed a significant number, especially as the analysed scenarios can be regarded to be realistic situations which can occur in reality even if the applicable separation distances are applied.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 116 , Issue 1177 , March 2012 , pp. 287 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hahn, K.-U. and Schwarz, C.W. Wake Vortex Avoidance versus Landing Capacity, AIAA Paper 2006-6322, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Keystone, Colorado, USA, 2006.Google Scholar
2. Crow, S.C. Stability Theory for a Pair of Trailing Vortices, AIAA J, 1970, 8, (12), pp 2374–2381.Google Scholar
3. Luckner, R. Overview on Research in Wake Vortex Encounter Flight Tests and Flight Simulations, WakeNet2-Europe workshop on wake vortex encounter in flight and in flight simulation, May 10-11 2004, Airbus Deutschland, Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
4. N.N. Wake Vortex Research Needs for Improved Wake Vortex Separation Ruling and Reduced Wake Signatures, WakeNet2-Europe Specialist’s Report, April, 2006.Google Scholar
5. Loucel, R.E. and Crouch, J.D. Flight-Simulator study of airplane encounters with perturbed trailing vortices, AIAA Paper 2004-1074, 42nd AIAA Aeospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, USA, 2004.Google Scholar
6. Spence, G.T., Le Moigne, A., Allerton, D.J. and Qin, N. Wake vortex model for real-time flight simulation based on large eddy simulation, J Aircr, 2007, 44, 2, pp 467–475.Google Scholar
7. Allerton, D.J. and Spence, G.T. Wake vortex encounters in a flight simulator, Aeronaut J, 2010, 114, (1159), pp 579–587.Google Scholar
8. Schwarz, C.W. and Hahn, K.-U. Simplified Hazard Areas for Wake Vortex Encounter Avoidance, AIAA Paper 2005-5903, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit, San Francisco, California, USA, 2005.Google Scholar
9. Hahn, K.-U. and Schwarz, C.W. Save limits for wake vortex penetration, AIAA Paper 2007-6871, AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, Hilton Head, South Carolina, USA, 2007.Google Scholar
10. Vechtel, D. and Amelsberg, S. Full flight simulator study for evaluation of aircraft dynamics while encountering curved wake vortices, DLR IB 111-2009-17, 2009.Google Scholar
11. Burnham, D. and Hallock, J. Chicago Monoacoustic Vortex Sensing System 4, Wake Vortex Decay, Springfield, VA, National Information Service, 1982.Google Scholar
12. Rosenhead, L. The Formation of Vortices from a Surface of Discontinuity, Proceedings Royal Society of London, Ser. A., 134: pp 170–192, 1932.Google Scholar
13. Fischenberg, D. Bestimmung der Wirbelschleppen-charakteristik aus Flugmessdaten (english: Determination of Wake Vortex Characteristics from Flight Test Data), German Aerospace Congress, Stuttgart, 23.-26.9.2002, DGLR-JT2002-170, 2002.Google Scholar
14. Hennemann, I. Deformation und Zerfall von Flugzeugwirbelschleppen in turbulenter und stabil geschichteter Atmosphäre (english: Deformation and Decay of Aircraft Wake Vortices in Turbulent and Stratified Atmosphere), Dissertation, Technical University Munich, Germany, 2010.Google Scholar
15. Hennemann, I. Large-Eddy Simulation of Aircraft Wake Vortex Deformation and Topology, Proceedings of the Institute of Mechanical Engineers, Part G, J Aerospace Engineering.Google Scholar
16. Frech, M. et al. High-resolution weather database fort he terminal area of Frankfurt airport, J Applied Meteorology and Climatology, November 2006, 46.Google Scholar
17. Lamb, H. Hydrodynamics, Cambridge University Press, pp 590–592, Cambridge, UK, 1932.Google Scholar
18. Barrows, T.M. Simplified Methods of Predicting Aircraft Rolling Moments due to Vortex Encounters, AIAA 76-61, AIAA 14th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, 1976.Google Scholar
19. de Bruin, A. WAVENC, Wake Vortex Evolution and Wake Vortex Encounter, Publishable Synthesis Report, National Aerospace Lab., NLR-TR-2000-079, Amsterdam, 2000.Google Scholar
20. Fischenberg, D. Results of Flight Test Data Analysis, SWAKE-TN-222_1, 2002.Google Scholar
21. Jategaonkar, R., Fischenberg, D. and Gruenhagen, W.V. Aerodynamic Modelling and System Identification from Flight Data – Recent Applications at DLR, J Aircr, 2004, 41, (4), p 687.Google Scholar
22. Sammonds, R.I. and Stinnett, G.W. Jr. Hazard Criteria for Wake Vortex Encounters, NASA TM X-62473, August 1975.Google Scholar
23. Hahn, K.-U., Schwarz, C.W. and Kloidt, S. Full-Flight Simulatorstudie zur Verifizierung von Wirbelschleppen-Gefährdungsraum grenzen (english: Full-Flight Simulator Study for Verification of Wake Vortex Hazard Area Boundaries), DLR IB-111-2004/42, 2004.Google Scholar
24. Hahn, K.-U., Schwarz, C.W. and Friehmelt, H. A Simplified Hazard Area Prediction (SHAPe) Model for Wake Vortex Encounter Avoidance, ICAS, 24th International Congress of Aeronautical Sciences Proceedings, 2004.Google Scholar
25. Lelaie, C. and Reinke, A. Airbus wake vortex flight test campaigns and general conclusions, WakeNet3-Europe 1st workshop on wake turbulence safety in future aircraft operations, 9 January 2009, Paris, France.Google Scholar
26. Rouzeval, M. Lessons learned from the Airbus wake vortex flight test campaign: some resulting operational recommendations, RAEs vortex training considerations, June 2009.Google Scholar
27. Luckner, R., Höhne, G. and Fuhrmann, M. Hazard criteria for wake vortex encounters during approach, Aerospace Science and Technology, 8, pp 673–687, 2004.Google Scholar
28. Fischenberg, D. A method to validate wake vortex encounter models from flight test data, ICAS 2010, 27th International congess of the aeronautical sciences, Nice, France, 2010.Google Scholar