Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T01:14:35.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Examples of applications of the peridynamic theory to the solution of static equilibrium problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

M. Zaccariotto ,
F. Luongo ,
G. sarego  and
U. Galvanetto
M. Zaccariotto*
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy Centre of Studies and Activities for Space (CISAS), Padova, Italy
F. Luongo
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy Centre of Studies and Activities for Space (CISAS), Padova, Italy
G. sarego
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy Centre of Studies and Activities for Space (CISAS), Padova, Italy
U. Galvanetto
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy Centre of Studies and Activities for Space (CISAS), Padova, Italy
*
mirco.zaccariotto@unipd.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Peridynamics is a recently proposed continuum theory based on a non local approach and formulated with integral equations. The theory is suitable for dealing with crack propagation in solid materials. The original peridynamic formulation regarded dynamic problems and was adapted to the static case mainly using a relaxation method by introducing a substantial amount of numerical damping in the time integration. In the present work the implementation of the theory within an implicit code for static crack propagation phenomena based on the Newton-Raphson method is presented and applied to several examples of static crack propagation equilibrium problems. Results obtained with the newly developed procedure are presented for various structural configurations, with different boundary and load conditions and quantitatively compared to published data.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 119 , Issue 1216 , June 2015 , pp. 677 - 700
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Zehnder, A.T.Fracture Mechanics, Series: Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics, 62, Springer, London, UK, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Mi, Y., Crisfield, M.A., Davies, G.A.O. and Hellweg, H.B.Progressive delamination using interface elements, J Compos Mater, 1998, 32, pp 1246–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Munoz, J.J., Galvanetto, U. and Robinson, P.On the numerical simulation of fatigue driven delamination with interface elements, Int J Fatigue, 2006, 28, pp 1136–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Turon, A., Dávila, C.G., Camanho, P. P. and Costa, J.An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models, Eng Fract Mech, 2007, 74, pp 1665–1682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Zi, G. and Belytschko, T.New crack-tip elements for XFEM and applications to cohesive cracks, Int J Numer Meth Eng, 2003, 57, pp 2221–2240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Belytschko, T., Chen, H., Xu, J.X. and Zi, G.Dynamic crack propagation based on loss of hyperbolicity and a new discontinuous enrichment, Int J Numer Meth Eng, 2003, 58, pp 1873–1905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Möes, N., Stolz, C., Chevaugeon, N. and Salzman, A.The Thick Level Set Model: A non-local damage model allowing automatic crack placement inside localization zones, Proceedings of CFRAC 2013, Computational Modeling of Fracture and Failure of Materials and Structures, 5-7 June, Prague, Czech Republic, 2013.Google Scholar
8.Nguyen, V.P., Rabczuk, T., Bordas, S. and Duflot, M.Meshless methods: a review and computer implementation aspects, Math Comput Simulat, 2008, 79, pp 763–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Fleming, M., Chu, Y.A., Moran, B. and Belytschko, T.Enriched element-free Galerkin methods for crack tip fields, Int J Num Meth, 1997, 40, pp 1483–1504.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Ventura, G., Xu, J.X. and Belytschko, A.Vector level set method and new discontinuity approximations for crack growth by EFG, Int J Num Meth Eng, 2002, 54, pp 923–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Muthu, N., Maiti, S.K., Falzon, B.G. and Guiamatsia, I.A comparison of stress intensity factors obtained through crack closure integral and other approaches using eXtended element-free Galerkin method, Comput Mech, 2013, 52, pp 587–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Muthu, N., Falzon, B.G., Maiti, S.K. and Hoddam, S.K.Modified crack closure integral technique for extraction of SIFs in mesh free methods, Finite Elementsin Analysis and Design, 2014, 78, pp 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Silling, S.A.Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces, J Mech Phys Solids, 2000, 48, pp 175–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Silling, S.A., Weckner, O., Askari, E. and Bobaru, F.Crack nucleation in a peridynamic solid, Int J Fract, 2010, 162, pp 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Kilic, B. and Madenci, E.An adaptive dynamic relaxation method for quasi-static simulations using the peridynamic theory, Theor Appl Fract Mech, 2010, 53, pp 194–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Mitchell, J.A. A nonlocal, ordinary, state-based plasticity model for Peridynamics, Technical report, Sandia National Laboratories, SAND2011-3166, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Mitchell, J.A. A non-local, ordinary-state-based viscoelasticity model for Peridynamics, Technical report, Sandia National Laboratories, SAND2011-8064, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Parks, M.L., Littlewood, D.J., Mitchell, J.A. and Silling, S.A. Peridigm Users’ Guide v1.0.0, Technical report, Sandia National Laboratories, SAND2012-7800, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Ladanyi, G. and Jenei, I. Investigation of peridynamic plastic material model, Proceedings of the 4th IASME/WSEAS International Conference on Continuum Mechanics (CM’09), 2009.Google Scholar
20.Breitenfeld, M.S.et alNon-ordinary state-based peridynamic analysis of stationary crack problems, Computer Meth in Appl Mech Eng, 2014, 272, pp 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Liu, W. and Hong, J.-W.A coupling approach of discretized peridynamics with finite element method, Computer Meth in Appl Mech Eng, 2012, 245-246, pp 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Carpinteri, A. and Colombo, G.Numerical analysis of catastrophic softening behavior (snap back instability), Computer & Struct, 1989, 31, pp 607–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Warren, T.L., Silling, S.A., Askari, A., Weckner, O., Epton, M.A. and Xu, J.A non-ordinary state-based peridynamic method to model solid material deformation and fracture, Int J Solids Struct, 2009, 46, pp 1186–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Yu, K., Xin, X.J. and Lease, K.B.A new method of adaptive integration with error control for bond-based peridynamics, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science Vol II – WCECS 2010, 20-22 October 2010, San Francisco, USA, 2010.Google Scholar
25.Silling, S.A. and Askari, E.A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics, Computers & Struct, 2005, 83, pp 1526–1535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Crisfield, M.A.Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis Of Solids And Structures, Wiley, Chichester, England, 1996.Google Scholar
27.Silling, S.A. and Lehoucq, R.B.Convergence of peridynamics to classical elasticity theory, J Elast, 2008, 93, pp 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Ha, Y.D. and Bobaru, F.Studies of dynamic crack propagation and crack branching with peridynamics, Int J Fract, 2010, 162, pp 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Su, X.Yang, Z. and Liu, G.Finite element modeling of complex 3D static and dynamic crack propagation by embedding cohesive elements in Abaqus, Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 2010, 23, pp 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Yang, Z.Fully automatic modeling of mixed-mode crack propagation using scaled boundary finite element method, Eng Fract Mech, 2006, 73, pp 1711–1731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Zhang, H.H., Li, L.X., An, X.M. and Ma, G.W.Numerical analysis of 2D crack propagation problems using the numerical manifold method, Eng Anal Bound Elem, 2010, 34, pp 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Saleh, A.L. and Aliabadi, M.H.Crack growth analysis in concrete using boundary element method, Eng Fract Mech, 1995, 51, pp 533–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar