Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T08:14:46.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A European View

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

F. E. Mostyn  and
P. Martin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I am to argue in favour of strict liability as against the carrier and to oppose the limitation of damages, arguments which I advance with some satisfaction since I happen also to believe them.

Strict liability is a doctrine more usually associated with the law of tort than the law of contract but as an injury resulting from an air crash is both contractual and tortious (and it even seems at one time to have been decided in America that the Warsaw Convention had itself created a cause of action), even if it be inelegant from a lawyer's point of view, I shall make no distinction between them. There are enough distinctions to be made on this topic without insisting on the lawyer's habit of mind.

Type
Air Law Group
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 75 , Issue 722 , February 1971 , pp. 85 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1971 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lowenfeld, and Mendelsohn, . The United States and the War aw Convention. Harvard Law Review, Vol 80, No 3, pp. 449–500, January 1967.Google Scholar
2.Ibid, p. 5C0.Google Scholar
3.Ibid, p. 521.Google Scholar
4. Prosser, Dean. The Law of Torts, pp. 220–221, 1964.Google Scholar
5. Devlin, Lord. Law & Morals, p. 18, 1961.Google Scholar
6. SirPollock, Frederick. A Plea for Historical Interpretation. 39 LQR 164, 1923.Google Scholar
7. Friedmann, Professor. Law in a Changing Society, p. 488, 1959.Google Scholar
8. Malone, Professor. A Review of “Negligence without Fault”, by Prof. Ehrenzweig, 25 So. Calif. L. Rev. 14–16.Google Scholar
9. Lowenfeld, and Mendelsohn, . The United States and the Warsaw Convention. Harvard Law Review, Vol 80, No 3, pp. 554–556, 566, January 1967.Google Scholar
10.Ibid, p. 561.Google Scholar
1. Devlin, Lord, The Law and Morals, 1961.Google Scholar
2.Committee on Personal Injuries Litigation (The Winn Committee). Cmnd 3691, July 1968.Google Scholar
3.Horabin v. BO AC (1952) 2 All ER 1016.Google Scholar
4. Kreindler, L. Compensation for Airline Passenger Death and Injury. The Future of the Warsaw Convention. Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 71, pp. 501–510, July 1967.Google Scholar