Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The discovery and prediction of vortex flow aerodynamics

  • J.M. Luckring (a1)

Abstract

High-speed aircraft often develop separation-induced leading-edge vortices and vortex flow aerodynamics. In this paper, the discovery of separation-induced vortex flows and the development of methods to predict these flows for wing aerodynamics are reviewed. Much of the content for this article was presented at the 2017 Lanchester Lecture and the content was selected with a view towards Lanchester’s approach to research and development.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The discovery and prediction of vortex flow aerodynamics
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The discovery and prediction of vortex flow aerodynamics
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The discovery and prediction of vortex flow aerodynamics
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

Footnotes

Hide All

A version of this paper was first presented at the RAeS Lanchester Named Lecture, October 2017, London, UK.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
[1]Squire, L.C. Experimental work on the aerodynamics of integrated slender wings for supersonic flight, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1981, 20, pp 196.
[2]Gibbs-Smith, C.H. The Invention of the Aeroplane 1799–1909, Taplinger Publishing, 1966, London, England.
[3]Prandtl, L. Uber Flussigkeitsbewegung bei sehr kleiner Reibung, Verhandlungen des dritten Internatalen Mathematiker, 3rd Kongresses in Heidelberg, 1904. Also NACA Technical Memorandum No. 452, 1928.
[4]Prandtl, L. Tragflügeltheorie, Göttingen Nachrichten der K Gesellschaft der Wlssenschaften, Mathematisch-physikalische Klasse, Part 1, 1918. Also abstracted as Theory of Lifting Surfaces, Part 1, NACA Technical Note 9, 1920, and discussed in Applications of Modern Hydrodynamics to Aeronautics, NACA Report 116, 1921.
[5]Munk, M.M. Isoperimetrische Probleme aus der Theorie des Fluges, Göttingen dissertation, 1918. Also NACA Report 121, 1923.
[6]Von Karman, T. Aerodynamics, Selected Topics in the Light of Their Historical Development, Cornell University Press, 1957, Ithaca, New York, USA.
[7]Lanchester, F.W. Aerodynamics, Constituting the First Volume of a Complete Work on Aerial Flight, Archibald Constable, 1907, London, England.
[8]Lanchester, F.W. Aerodynamics, Constituting the Second Volume of a Complete Work on Aerial Flight, Archibald Constable, 1908, London, England.
[9]Lanchester, F.W., Aircraft in Warfare, Archibald Constable, 1916, London, England.
[10]Lin, J.C., Robinson, S.K., McGhee, R.J. and Valarezo, W.O. Separation control on high-lift airfoils via micro-vortex generators, AIAA J of Aircraft, 1994, 31 (6), pp 13171323.
[11]Lin, J.C. Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer separation, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2002, 38, pp 389420.
[12]Jones, R.T. Properties of low-aspect-ratio pointed wings at speeds below and above the speed of sound, NACA R-835, 1946.
[13]Polhamus, E.C., A simple method of estimating the subsonic lift and damping in roll of sweptback wings, NACA TN-1862, 1949.
[14]Lippisch, A. The Delta Wing, Iowa State University Press, 1981, Ames, Iowa, USA.
[15]Lepage, J-D.G.G. Aircraft of the Luftwaffe, 1935-1945: An Illustrated Guide, McFarland, 2009, Jefferson, North Carolina, USA.
[16]Winter, H. Strömungsvorgänge an Platten and profilierten Körpern bei kleinen Spannweiten, Forschungsgesellschaft fur Ingenieur-Wissen schaften, 1935, 6 (1), pp 4050. Also NACA TM-798, 1936.
[17]Polhamus, E.C. Vortex lift research: early contributions and some current challenges, NASA CP-2416, 1, 1986.
[18]Jones, R.T. Wing planforms for high speed flight, NACA Report 863, 1945.
[19]Busemann, A. Aerodynamischer Auftrieb bei Überschallgeschwindigkeit, Volta Congress, 1935. Also Luftfahrtforschong, 1935, 12 (6), pp 210220. Also 5th Volta Congress on High Speed in Aeronautics, Rome, Italy, September–October 1935, pp 315–347.
[20]Wilson, H.A. and Lovell, J.C. Full-scale investigation of the maximum lift flow characteristics of an airplane having approximately triangular planform, NACA RM L6K20, 1947.
[21]Chambers, J.R. Cave of the winds, NASA SP-2014-614, 2014.
[22]National Museum of the United States Air Force. XF-92A Dart/46-682, Retrieved: 9 July 2017. Also National Air and Space Museum, https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/lippisch-dm-1.
[23]Polhamus, E.C. Applying slender wing benefits to military aircraft, AIAA J of Aircraft, 1984, 21 (8), pp 545559, Also AIAA Paper 83–2556, 1983.
[24]Anderson, J.D., Jr. Fundamental of Aerodynamics, 2 nd, McGraw-Hill, 1991, New York, New York, USA.
[25]Hummel, D. On the vortex formation over a slender wing at large incidence, AGARD CP-247, Paper 15, 1979.
[26]Payne, F.M., Ng, T.T., Nelson, R.C. and Schiff, L.B., Visualization and flow surveys of the leading edge vortex structure on delta wing planforms, AIAA paper 86–0330, 1986.
[27]Lambourne, N.C. and Bryer, D.W. The bursting of leading edge vortices — some observations and discussion of the phenomenon, ARC R&M 3282, 1962.
[28]Deck, S. and Luckring, J.M. Zonal Detached Eddy Simulation (ZDES) of the flow around the AVT-183 diamond wing configuration, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2016, 57, pp 4351.
[29]Gursul, I., Gordnier, R. and Visbal, M. Unsteady aerodynamics of nonslender delta wings, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2005, 41, pp 515557.
[30]Hall, M.G. On the vortex associated with flow separation from a leading edge of a slender wing, RAE TN Aero.2629, 1959.
[31]Legendre, R. Ecoulement au voisinage de la pointe avant d’une aile a forte fleche aux incidences moyennes, Rech Aero, 1952, 30, pp 38.
[32]Legendre, R., Ecoulement au voisinage de la pointe avant d’une aile a forte fleche aux incidences moyennes, Rech Aero, 1953, 31, pp 36.
[33]Brown, C.E. and Michael, W.H. Jr. Effect of leading-edge separation on the lift of a delta wing, J of the Aeronautical Sciences, October 1954.
[34]Mangler, K.W. and Smith, J.H.B. A theory of the flow past a slender delta wing with leading edge separation, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, 1959, 251, (1265), pp 200217.
[35]Smith, J.H.B. Improved calculations of leading-edge separation from slender delta wings, RAE TR 66070, 1966.
[36]Hall, M.G. A theory for the core of a leading-edge vortex, J of Fluid Mechanics, 1961 11 (2), pp 209228.
[37]Harvey, J.K. Some measurements on a yawed delta wing with leading edge separation, ARC Report, 1958, 20, p 451.
[38]Stewartson, K. and Hall, M.G. The inner viscous solution for the core of a leading-edge vortex, J of Fluid Mechanics, 1963, 15, pp 306318.
[39]Brown, S.N. The compressible inviscid leading-edge vortex, J of Fluid Mechanics, 1965, 22 (1), pp 1732.
[40]Mangler, K.W., and Weber, J. The flow field near the centre of a rolled-up vortex sheet, J of Fluid Mechanics, 1967, 30 (1), pp 177196.
[41]Brown, S.N. and Mangler, K.W. An asymptotic solution for the centre of a rolled-up conical vortex sheet in compressible flow, The Aeronautical Quarterly, 1967, 18 (4), pp 354366.
[42]Hall, M.G. A numerical method for solving the equations for a vortex core, ARC R&M 3467, 1967.
[43]Newman, B.G. Flow in a viscous trailing vortex, The Aeronautical Quarterly, 1959, 10 (2), pp 149162.
[44]Hummel, D. Experimentelle Untersuchung der Strömung auf der Saugseite eines schlanken Deltaflügels, Z. Flugwiss, 1965, 13. Also Experimental investigation of the flow on the suction side of a thin delta wing, NASA TM-75897, 1981.
[45]Polhamus, E.C. A concept of the vortex lift of sharp-edged delta wings based on a leading-edge suction analogy, NASA TN D-3767, December 1966.
[46]Margason, R.J. and Lamar, J.E. Vortex-lattice FORTRAN program for estimating subsonic aerodynamic characteristics of complex planforms, NASA TND-6142, 1971.
[47]Lamar, J.E. and Gloss, B.B. Subsonic aerodynamic characteristics on interacting lifting surfaces with separated flow around sharp edges predicted by a vortex-lattice method, NASA TN D-7921, 1975.
[48]Polhamus, E.C. Predictions of vortex-lift characteristics by a leading-edge suction analogy, AIAA J. Aircraft, 1971, 8 (4), pp 193199.
[49]Polhamus, E.C. Application of the leading-edge suction analogy of vortex lift to the drag due to lift of sharp-edge delta wings, NASA TN D-4739, 1968.
[50]Lamar, J.E. Extension of leading-edge suction analogy to wings with separated flow around the side edges at subsonic speeds, NASA TR R-428, 1974.
[51]Lamar, J.E. Some recent applications of the suction analogy to vortex-lift estimates, NASA SP-347, Part II, 1975.
[52]Fox, C.H., Jr. and Huffman, J.K. Calibration and test capabilities of the Langley 7- by 10-foot high-speed tunnel, NASA TM X-74027, 1977.
[53]Luckring, J.M. Aerodynamics of strake-wing interactions, AIAA J of Aircraft, 1979, 16 (11), pp 756762.
[54]Brune, G.W., Weber, J.A., Johnson, F.T., Lu, P. and Rubbert, P.E. A three-dimensional solution of flows over wings with leading-edge vortex separation, NASA CR-132709, 1975.
[55]Gloss, B.B., and Johnson, F.T., Development of an aerodynamic theory capable of predicting surface loads on slender wings with vortex flow, Proceedings of the SCAR Conference, NASA CP-001, Nov 1976, Hampton, Virginia, USA.
[56]Johnson, F.T., Lu, P., Tinoco, E.N. and Epton, M.A. An improved panel method for the solution of three-dimensional leading-edge vortex flows. Volume I–theory document, NASA CR-3278, 1980.
[57]Marsden, D.J., Simpson, R.W. and Rainbird, W.J. Investigation into the Flow Over Delta Wings at Low Speeds with Leading-Edge Separation, Rep. 114, ARC 20409, College of Aeronautics, Cranfield, 1958
[58]Hoeijmakers, H.W.M. and Bennekers, B. A computational model for the calculation of the flow about wings with leading-edge vortices, AGARD CP-247. Paper No. 25, January 1979.
[59]Hoeijmakers, H.W.M. Computational vortex flow aerodynamics, AGARD CP-342, Paper No. 18, July 1983.
[60]Hitzel, S.M. and Wagner, B. Berechnung der 3-dim. Strömung am Flügel mit Vorderkantenablösung, Teil 1, Panelverfahren höherer Ordnung, Dornier Report 80/18B, Dornier Gmbh, Friednchshafen, West Germany, 1980.
[61]Luckring, J.M. Recent progress in computational vortex flow aerodynamics, AGARD CP-494, Paper No. 6, July 1991.
[62]Luckring, J.M. A theory for the core of a three-dimensional leading-edge vortex, AIAA Paper 85–0108, 1985.
[63]Earnshaw, P.B. An experimental investigation of the structure of a leading-edge vortex, ARC R&M 3281, 1962.
[64]Ludweig, H. Zur Erklärung der Instabilität der über angestellten Deltaflügeln auftretenden freien Wirkbelkerne, Z. Flugwiss, 1962, 10 (6), pp 242249. Also, NASA technical translation, TM-75861, 1980.
[65]Wentz, W.H., Jr. and Kohlman, D.L. Wind-tunnel investigation of vortex breakdown on slender sharp-edged wings, NASA CR-98737, 1968.
[66]Jameson, A., Schmidt, W. and Turkel, E. Numerical solutions to the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time-stepping schemes, AIAA Paper 81–1259, 1981.
[67]Rizzi, A. Spurious entropy production and very accurate solutions to the Euler equations, AIAA Paper 1984–1644, 1984.
[68]Newsome, R.W. A comparison of Euler and Navier-Stokes solutions for supersonic flow over a conical delta wing, AIAA Paper 85–0111, 1985.
[69]Powel, K.G. Vortical Solutions of the Conical Euler Equations, CFDL-TR-87-8, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1987, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
[70]Hoeijmakers, H.W.M. and Rizzi, A. Vortex-fitted potential and vortex-captured Euler solution for leading-edge vortex flow, AIAA Journal, 1985, 23 (12), pp 19831985. Also, AIAA-84-2144, 1984.
[71]Rizzi, A. Euler solutions of transonic vortex flows around the Dillner wing, AIAA Journal of Aircraft, 1985, 22 (4), pp 325328. Also, AIAA-84-2142, 1984.
[72]Drougge, G. The international vortex flow experiment for computer code validation, ICAS-Proceedings Jerusalem 1988, 1, pp 3541.
[73]Elsenaar, A., Hjelmberg, L., Büttefisch, K.A. and Bannink, W.J. The international vortex flow experiment, AGARD CP-437, Paper 9, 1988.
[74]Wagner, B., Hitzel, S.M., Schmatz, M.A., Schwarz, W., Hilgenstock, A. and Scherr, S. Status of CFD validation on the vortex flow experiment, AGARD CP-437, Paper 10, 1988.
[75]Elsenaar, A. and Hoeijmakers, H.W.M. An experimental study of the flow over a sharp-edged delta wing at subsonic and transonic speeds, AGARD CP-494, Paper 15, 1991.
[76]Fujii, K. and Kutler, P. Numerical simulation of the leading-edge separation vortex for a wing and a strake-wing configuration, AIAA Paper 83–1908, 1983.
[77]Fujii, K. and Kutler, P. Numerical simulation of the viscous flow fields over three-dimensional complicated geometries, AIAA Paper 84–1550, 1984.
[78]Beam, R. and Warming, R.F. An implicit factored scheme for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, AIAA Paper 77–645, 1977
[79]Pulliam, T.H. and Steger, J.L. Implicit finite-difference simulations of three-dimensional compressible flow, AIAA Journal, 1980, 18 (2), pp 159167. Also AIAA Paper 78–10, 1978.
[80]Thomas, J.L., van Leer, B. and Walters, R.W., Implicit flux-split schemes for the Euler equations. AIAA Paper 85–1680, 1985.
[81]Thomas, J.L., and Walters, R.W., Upwind Relaxation Algorithms for the Navier-Stokes equations, AIAA Paper 85-1501 CP, 1985.
[82]Biedron, R.T. and Thomas, J.L. A generalized patched-grid algorithm with application to the F-18 forebody with actuated control strake, Computing Systems in Engineering, 1990, 1 (2–4), pp 563576.
[83]Thomas, J.L. and Newsome, R.W. Navier-Stokes computations of lee-side flows over delta wings, AIAA Paper 86–1049, 1986.
[84]Miller, D.S. and Wood, R.M. Lee-side flow over delta wings at supersonic speeds, NASA TP-2430, 1985. Also, AIAA Paper 83–1816, 1983.
[85]Thomas, J.L., Taylor, S.L. and Anderson, W.K. Navier-Stokes computations of vortical flows over low aspect ratio wings, AIAA Paper No 87–0207, 1987.
[86]Hall, R.M., Murri, D.G., Erickson, G.E., Fisher, D.F., Banks, D.W. and Lanser, W.R. Overview of HATP Experimental Aerodynamics Data for the Baseline F/A-18 Configuration. NASA TM-112360, 1996.
[87]Bowers, A.H., Pahle, J.W., Wilson, R.J., Flick, B.C. and Rood, R.L. An overview of the NASA F-18 high alpha research vehicle, NASA TM 4772, 1996.
[88]Ghaffari, F.G., Luckring, J.M., Thomas, J.L. and Bates, B.L. Navier-Stokes solutions about the F/A-18 forebody-leading-edge extension configuration, AIAA J of Aircraft, 1990, 27 (9), pp 737748. Also, AIAA Paper 89–0338, 1989.
[89]Degani, D. and Schiff, L.B. Computation of supersonic viscous flows around pointed bodies at large incidence, AIAA Paper 83–0034, 1983.
[90]Baldwin, B.S. and Lomax, H. Thin layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flows, AIAA Paper 78–257, 1978.
[91]Ghaffari, F.G., Luckring, J.M., Thomas, J.L., Bates, B.L. and Biedron, R.T. Multiblock Navier-Stokes solutions about the F/A-18 wing-LEX-fuselage configuration, AIAA J of Aircraft, 1993, 30 (3), pp 293303. Also AIAA Paper 91-3291-CP, 1991.
[92]Flores, J. and Chaderjian, N. The numerical simulation of transonic separated flow about the complete F-16A, AIAA Paper 88–2506, 1988.
[93]Spalart, P.R., Jou, W-H., Strelets, M. and Allmaras, S.R. Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a Hybrid RANS/LES approach, Advances in DNS/LES, 1st AFOSR Int. Conf. on DNS/LES, Grey den Press, 1997, Columbus. Ohio, US.
[94]Frink, N.T., Pirzadeh, S.Z., Parikh, P.C., Pandya, M.M.J. and Bhat, M.K. Tetrahedral Unstructured, The NASA Software System (TetrUSS), ICAS 2000 Congress, Paper 0241, 2000.
[95]Strang, W.Z., Tomaro, R.F., Grismer, M.J., The defining methods of cobalt: a parallel, implicit, unstructured Euler/Navier-stokes flow solver, AIAA Paper 1999–0786, 1999.
[96]Morton, S.A., Forsythe, J.R., Mitchell, J.M. and Hajek, D. DES and RANS simulations of delta wing vortical flows, AIAA Paper 2002–0287, 2002.
[97]Spalart, P.R., and Allmaras, S.R., A one equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows, La Recherche Aerospatiale, 1994, 1, pp 521.
[98]Mitchell, A., Molton, P., Barberis, D. and Delery, J. Characterization of vortex breakdown by flow field and surface measurements, AIAA 2000–0788, 2000.
[99]RTO. Vortex breakdown over slender delta wings, RTO-TR-AVT-080, 2009.
[100]Forsythe, J.R., Squires, K.D., Wurtzler, K.E. and Spalart, P.R. Detached-Eddy simulation of the F-15E at high alpha, AIAA J of Aircraft, 2004, 41 (2), pp 193200. Also AIAA 2002–0591, 2002.
[101]Pirzadeh, S. Vortical flow prediction using an adaptive unstructured grid method, RTO-MP-069-I, Paper 13, 2003.
[102]Chu, J. and Luckring, J.M. Experimental surface pressure data obtained on 65° delta wing across Reynolds number and Mach number ranges. Vol. 1–4, NASA TM-4645, 1996.
[103]Hall, R.M. Impact of fuselage cross section on the stability of a generic fighter, AIAA Paper 98–2725, 1998.
[104]Mitchell, A., Morton, S. and Forsythe, J. Analysis of delta wing vortical substructures using detached-eddy simulation, AIAA-2002-2968, 2002.
[105]Morton, S.A., Steenman, M., Cummings, R. and Forsythe, J.R. DES Grid Resolution Issues for Vortical Flows on a Delta Wing and an F-18C, AIAA Paper 2003–1103, 2003.
[106]Fisher, D., Del Frate, J.H. and Zuniga, F.A. Summary of In-Flight Flow Visualization Obtained from the NASA High Alpha Research Vehicle, NASA TM-101734, 1991.
[107]Luckring, J.M. Reynolds Number, Compressibility, and Leading-Edge Bluntness Effects on Delta-Wing Aerodynamics. ICAS Paper 2004–0414, 2004.
[108]Luckring, J.M. Reynolds Number and Leading-Edge Bluntness Effects on a 65 Delta-Wing, AIAA Paper 2002–0419, 2002.
[109]RTO. Understanding and Modeling Vortical Flows to Improve the Technology Readiness Level for Military Aircraft, RTO-TR-AVT-113, 2009.
[110]STO. Reliable Prediction of Separated Flow Onset and Progression for Air and Sea Vehicles, STO-TR-AVT-183, 2017.
[111]RTO. Assessment of Stability and Control Prediction Methods for NATO Air and Sea Vehicles, RTO-TR-AVT-161, 2012.
[112]Luckring, J.M. and Hummel, D. What was learned from the new VFE-2 experiments?, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2013, 24 (1). Also AIAA paper 2008–0383, 2008.
[113]Konrath, R., Klein, C. and Schröder, A. PSP and PIV investigations on the VFE-2 configuration in sub- and transonic flow, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2013, 24 (1). Also AIAA paper 2008–0379, 2008.
[114]Fritz, W. Numerical simulation of the peculiar subsonic flow-field about the VFE-2 delta wing with rounded leading edge, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2013, 24 (1), pp 4555. Also AIAA paper 2008–0393, 2008.
[115]Kroll, N., Aumann, P., Bartelheimer, W., Bleecke, H., Eisfeld, B., Lieser, J., Heinrich, R., Kuntz, M., Monsen, E., Raddatz, J., Reisch, U. and Roll, B. FLOWer Installation and User Handbook, DLR. Doc. No. MEGAFLOW-1001, 1998.
[116]Frink, N.T., Tomac, M. and Rizzi, A. Collaborative study of incipient separation on 53-swept diamond wing, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2016, 57, pp 7689. Also AIAA paper 2015–0288, 2015.
[117]Hitzel, S.M., Boelens, O.J., Rooij, M. and Hövelmann, A. Vortex development on the AVT-183 diamond wing configuration– numerical and experimental findings, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2016, 57, pp 90102. Also AIAA paper 2015–0289, 2015.
[118]Daniel, D., Malloy, D.J., Reasor, D.A., Jr. and Morris, C.C. Numerical investigations of flow separation on the AVT-183 53 degree swept diamond wing configuration, STO-TR-AVT-183, Chapter 15, 2017. Also AIAA paper 2015–0066, 2015.
[119]Morton, S., McDaniel, D., Sears, D., Tillman, B. and Tuckey, T. Kestrel: a fixed wing virtual aircraft product of the CREATE program, AIAA Paper 2009–0338, 2009.
[120]Hövelmann, A, Knoth, F. and Breitsamter, C. AVT-183 diamond wing flow field characteristics part 1: varying leading-edge roughness and the effects on flow separation onset, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2016, 57, pp 1830. Also AIAA paper 2015–0063, 2015.
[121]Hövelmann, A, Grawunder, M., Buzica, A. and Breitsamter, C. AVT-183 diamond wing flow field characteristics part 2: experimental analysis of leading-edge vortex formation and progression, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2016, 57, pp 3142. Also AIAA paper 2015–0064, 2015.
[122]Hummel, D. and Cummings, R.M. (Eds), Special issue, VFE-2, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2013, 24 (1), pp 1294.
[123]Cummings, R.M. and Ghoreyshi, M. (Eds), Special issue, diamond wing aerodynamics, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2016, 57, pp 1118.
[124]Lamar, J.E., Obara, C.J., Fisher, B.D. and Fisher, D.F. Flight, wind-tunnel, and computational fluid dynamics comparison for cranked arrow wing (F-16XL-1) at subsonic and transonic speeds, NASA TP 2001–210629, February 2001.
[125]Lamar, J.E. Cranked arrow wing (F-16XL-1) flight flow physics with CFD predictions at subsonic and transonic speeds, RTO-MP-069-I, Paper 44, 2003.
[126]Luckring, J.M., Rizzi, A. and Davis, M.B. Toward improved predictions of slender airframe aerodynamics using the F-16XL aircraft, AIAA J of Aircraft, 2017, 54 (2), pp 378387.
[127]Rizzi, A., Badcock, K.J., Jirásek, A. and Boelens, O.J. What was learned from numerical simulations of F-16XL (CAWAPI) at flight conditions, AIAA Paper 2007–0683, 2007.
[128]Boelens, O.J., Spekreijse, S.P., Sytsma, H.A., and de Cock, K.M.J. Comparison of measured and simulated flow features for the full-scale F-16XL aircraft, AIAA Paper 2007–0489, 2007.
[129]Lamar, J.E. Prediction of F-16XL flight-flow physics, AIAA J of Aircraft, 2009, 46 (2), pp 354354.
[130]Davis, M.B., Reed, C. and Yagle, P. Hybrid grid solutions on the (CAWAPI) F-16XL using falcon v4, AIAA Paper 2007–0680, 2007.
[131]Luckring, J.M. and Lee-Rausch, E. Introduction to the special section on the prediction of F-16XL in-flight aerodynamics, AIAA J of Aircraft, 2017, 54 (2), p 377.
[132]Morton, S.A. and McDaniel, D.R. F-16XL simulations at flight conditions using hybrid near-Body/Offbody computational fluid dynamics, AIAA J of Aircraft, 2017, 54 (6), pp 20502069. Also AIAA Paper 2015–2873, 2015.
[133]Lofthouse, A.J. and Cummings, R.M. Numerical simulations of the F-16XL at flight-test conditions using delayed detached-eddy simulation, AIAA J of Aircraft, 2017, 54 (6), pp 20772099. Also AIAA Paper 2015–2875, 2015.
[134]Luckring, J.M. Introduction to the special section on F-16XL flight aerodynamics predictions at a high angle of attack, AIAA J of Aircraft, 2017, 54 (6), p 2013.
[135]AIAA. Guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations, AIAA G-077-1998, 1998.
[136]Oberkampf, W.L. and Trucano, T.G. Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2002, 38, pp 209272.
[137]ASME. Guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics, ASME V&V 10–2006, 2006.
[138]ASME. Standard for verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics and heat transfer, ASME V&V 20–2009, 2009.
[139]Oberkampf, W.L. and Roy, C.J. Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, 2010, New York, USA.
[140]Leibovich, S. The structure of vortex breakdown, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1978, 10, pp 221246.
[141]Grabowski, W.J. and Berger, S.A. Solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations for vortex breakdown, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1976, 75, pp 525544.
[142]Greenwell, D.I., Pitfalls in interpretation of delta wing vortex flow visualisation images, 2003, RTO-MP-069-I, Paper 5.
[143]Gordnier, R.E., Visbal, M.R., Gursul, I. and Wang, Z. Computational and experimental investigation of a nonslender delta wing, AIAA Journal, 2009, 47 (8), pp 18111825.
[144]Krist, S.E., Ratnayake, N.A. and Ghaffari, F. Kestrel results at lift-off conditions for a space launch configuration in proximity to the launch tower, to be published at the AIAA Aviation conference, 2019.
[145]Krist, S.E. Private Communication, 2018.
[146]Spalart, P.R. and Venkatakrishnan, V. On the role and challenges of CFD in the aerospace industry, The Aeronautical J, 2016, 120 (1223), pp 209232.
[147]Lovell, D. Military vortices, 2003, RTO-MP-069-I, Paper KN1.

Keywords

The discovery and prediction of vortex flow aerodynamics

  • J.M. Luckring (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed