Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T04:06:29.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design and analysis of a propulsion mechanism using modular umbrella-like wings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2018

F. Gao ,
J. G. Lv  and
X. C. Zhang
F. Gao*
Affiliation:
Mechanics Engineering College, Shijiazhuang, China The 2nd Inst of Corps of Engineers PLA, Beijing, China
J. G. Lv
Affiliation:
Mechanics Engineering College, Shijiazhuang, China
X. C. Zhang
Affiliation:
The 2nd Inst of Corps of Engineers PLA, Beijing, China
*
flyinghigh6@126.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article describes the design and evaluation of a new type of propulsion mechanism that uses modular umbrella-like wings oscillating symmetrically in counterphase to generate thrust. The principle of the propulsion and movement of the modular umbrella-like wings was first developed, and the mechanism used to implement the movement of the modular wings was subsequently designed. A structural model and the assembly relationship of the propulsion mechanism were developed for prototype fabrication. An experiment was established to measure the kinematic and mechanical performances of the propulsion mechanism for different reciprocating frequencies and travels. The results for the single umbrella-like wing indicate that either increasing the frequency or enlarging the travel can enhance the average aerodynamic force generated by the wing in one cycle. The results for the modular umbrella-like wings demonstrate that the inertial force generated by the mechanism can be balanced using a symmetrical structure. The average aerodynamic force would be markedly enhanced by increasing the percentage of the time that the outspread wing is moving downwards; e.g. the average aerodynamic force generated by the modular umbrella-like wings was increased by 85.84% compared to the value for a single umbrella-like wing for the same travel and frequency. This work provides practical guidance for optimising the structure design.

Keywords

Propulsion mechanismumbrella-like wingoscillating symmetricallyaerodynamic force
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 122 , Issue 1249 , March 2018 , pp. 349 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Shyy, W., Aono, H., Chimakurthi, S.K., Trizila, P., Kang, C.-K., Cesnik, C.E.S. and Liu, H. Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity, AIAA Program Aerospace Science, 2010, 46, (7), pp 284–327.Google Scholar
2. Brown, R.H.J. The flight of birds, Biological Reviews, 1963, 38, (4), pp 460–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. John, J.V. Avian Flight, 2005, Oxford University Press, New York, New York, US.Google Scholar
4. Liao, J.C., Beal, D.N., Lauder, G.V. and Triantafyllou, M.S. Fish exploiting vortices Decrease muscle activity, Science, 2003, 302, (5650), pp 1566–1569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Shadwick, R.E. and Lauder, G.V. Fish Biomechanics, Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2006.Google Scholar
6. Fearing, R.S., Chiang, K.H., Dickinson, M.H., Pick, D.L., Sitti, M. and Yan, J. Wing transmission for a micromechanical flying insect, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 2, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2000, San Francisco, California, US, pp 1509-1516.Google Scholar
7. Pornsin-Sirirak, T.N., Tai, Y.C., Ho, C.M. and Keennon, M. Microbat: A palm-sized electrically powered ornithopter. Proceedings of NASA/JPL Workshop on Biomorphic Robotics, 2001, Pasadena, California, US, pp 14-17.Google Scholar
8. Zdunich, P., Bilyk, D., MacMaster, M., Loewen, D., DeLaurier, J., Kornbluh, R., Low, T., Stanford, S. and Holeman, D. Development and testing of the mentor flapping-wing micro air vehicle, J Aircr, 2007, 44, (5), pp 1701–1711.Google Scholar
9. Rose, C. and Fearing, R.S. Comparison of ornithopter wind tunnel force measurements with free flight, Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2014 IEEE International Conference On, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2014, Hong Kong, China, pp 1816-1821.Google Scholar
10. Paranjape, A.A., Dorothy, M.R., Chung, S. and Lee, K. A flight mechanics-centric review of bird-scale flapping flight, Int J Aeronaut Space Science, 2012, 13, (3), pp 267–281.Google Scholar
11. Delautier, J.D. The development and testing of a full-scale piloted ornithopter, Canadian Aeronautics and Space J, 1999, 45, (2), pp 72–82.Google Scholar
12. Mazaheri, K. and Ebrahimi, A. Experimental study on interaction of aerodynamics with flexible wings of flapping vehicles in hovering and cruise flight, Archives of Applied Mechanics, 2010, 80, (11), pp 1255–1269.Google Scholar
13. Billingsley, D., Slipher, G., Grauer, J. and Hubbard, J. Testing of a passively morphing ornithopter wing, AIAA AUU Conference, AIAA, 2009, Seattle, Washington, US, pp 6-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Mueller, D., Gerdes, J.W. and Gupta, S.K. Incorporation of passive wing folding in flapping wing miniature air vehicles, 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol. 7, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2009, ASME, San Diego, California, US, pp 797-805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Lucas, K.N., Johnson, N., Beaulieu, W.T., Cathcart, E., Tirrell, G., Colin, S.P., Gemmell, B.J., Dabiri, J.O. and Costello, J.H. Bending rules for animal propulsion, Nature Communications, 2014, 5, (2), p 3293.Google Scholar
16. Zhang, W., Guo, S. and Asaka, K. A new type of hybrid fish-like microrobot, Int J Automation and Computing, 2006, 3, (4), pp 358–365.Google Scholar
17. Licht, S., Polidoro, V., Flores, M., Hover, F.S. and Triantafyllou, M.S. Design and projected performance of a flapping foil AUV, IEEE J Oceanic Eng, 2004, 29, (3), pp 786–794.Google Scholar
18. Epps, B.P., Valdivia y Alvarado, P., Youcef-Toumi, K. and Techet, A.H. Swimming performance of a biomimetic compliant fish-like robot, Experiments in Fluids, December 2009, 47, (6), pp 927–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Hover, F.S., HAugustsdal, Ø and Triantafyllou, M.S. Effect of angle of attack profiles in flapping foil propulsion, J Fluids and Structures, 2004, 19, (1), pp 37–47.Google Scholar
20. Jones, K.D. and Platzer, M.F. Experimental investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of flapping-wing micro air vehicles, AIAA, Paper No. 2003-0418, 2003.Google Scholar
21. Villanueva, A., Smith, C. and Priya, S. A biomimetic robotic jellyfish (Robojelly) actuated by shape memory alloy composite actuators, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2011, 6, (3), p 036004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Najem, J., Sarles, S.A., Akle, B. and Leo, D.J. Biomimetic jellyfish-inspired underwater vehicle actuated by ionic polymer metal composite actuators, Smart Materials and Structures, 2012, 21, (9), pp 299–312.Google Scholar
23. Nawroth, J.C., Lee, H., Feinberg, A.W., Ripplinger, C.M., McCain, M.L., Grosberg, A., Dabiri, J.O. and Parker, K.K. A tissue-engineered jellyfish with biomimetic propulsion, Nature Biotechnology, 2012, 30, (8), pp 792–797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Hedrick, T.L., Tobalske, B.W. and Biewener, A.A. Estimates of circulation and gait change based on a three-dimensional kinematic analysis of flight in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) and ringed turtle-doves (Streptopelia risoria), J Experimental Biology, 2002, 205, (10), pp 1389–1409.Google Scholar
25. Warrick, D.R., Tobalske, B.W. and Powers, D.R. Aerodynamics of the hovering hummingbird, Nature, 2005, 435, (7045), pp 1094–1097.Google Scholar
26. Carruthers, A.C., Walker, S.M., Thomas, A.L.R. and Taylor, G.K. Aerodynamics of aerofoil sections measured on a free-flying bird, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2010, 224, (8), pp 855–864.Google Scholar
27. Crandell, K.E. and Tobalske, B.W. Aerodynamics of tip-reversal upstroke in a revolving pigeon wing, J Experimental Biology, 2011, 214, (11), pp 1867–1873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Muijres, F.T., Bowlin, M.S., Johansson, L.C. and Hedenström, A. Vortex wake, downwash distribution, aerodynamic performance and wingbeat kinematics in slow-flying pied flycatchers, J Royal Soc Interface, 2012, 9, (67), pp 292–303.Google Scholar
29. McHenry, M.J. and Jed, J. The ontogenetic scaling of hydrodynamics and swimming performance in jellyfish (Aurelia aurita), J Experimental Biology, 2003, 206, (22), pp 4125–4137.Google Scholar
30. Dabiri, J.O., Colin, S.P. and Costello, J.H. Fast-swimming hydromedusae exploit velar kinematics to form an optimal vortex wake, J Experimental Biology, 2006, 209, (11), pp 2025–2033.Google Scholar
31. Gerdes, J.W. Design, Analysis, and Testing of a Flapping Wing Miniature Air Vehicle, Master's Thesis, 2010, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, US.Google Scholar
32. Zhao, J., Chu, F. and Feng, Z. The mechanism theory and application of deployable structures based on SLE, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2009, 44, (2), pp 324–335.Google Scholar
33. Langbecker, T. and Albermani, F. Kinematic and non-linear analysis of foldable barrel vaults, Engineering Structures, 2001, 23, (3), pp 158–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Nagaraj, B.P., Pandiyan, R. and Ghosal, A. A constraint Jacobian based approach for static analysis of pantograph masts, Computers & Structures, 2010, 88, (1), pp 95–104.Google Scholar
35. Comaniciu, D., Ramesh, V. and Meer, P. Kernel-based object tracking, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2003, 25, (5), pp 564–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Yilmaz, A., Javed, O. and Shah, M. Object tracking: A survey, ACM Computing Surveys, 2006, 38, (4), pp 1–45.Google Scholar