Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:34:57.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application of Lean principles and software solutions for maintenance records in continuing airworthiness management organisations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2018

H. M. Shakir  and
B. Iqbal
H. M. Shakir*
Affiliation:
GI Aerospace LLC, San Francisco, California, US
B. Iqbal
Affiliation:
GI Aerospace LLC, San Francisco, California, US
*
hadi.shakir@giaerospace.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper discusses how the processes of Continuing Airworthiness Management Organisations can be made more efficient by applying Lean principles and digital solutions, to obtain costs savings and improved compliance standards. Lean management is the process of eliminating waste by maximising value through balancing workloads and cutting out inefficient processes. Though Lean was initially applied to manufacturing production lines, an opportunity exists to apply the principles of Lean in airworthiness management. One such aspect of airworthiness management is the processing of records which is an essential part of safety and compliance. Software solutions designed with Lean philosophy and focus on airworthiness management processes can provide benefits in managing the flow of records and extracting actionable information from them for cost reduction and improving safety. Further value can be extracted by applying additional software solutions that will lay a strong foundation for machine learning and predictive analytics – taking aircraft maintenance from a reactive model towards a proactive model.

Keywords

Leanairworthiness managementsoftwareworkflows
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 122 , Issue 1254 , August 2018 , pp. 1263 - 1274
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T. and Roos, D. The Machine that Changed the World, 1990, HarperCollins, Rawson Associates, New York, US.Google Scholar
2.ICAO. Airworthiness of Aircraft - Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, 11th ed, 2010, International Civil Aviation Organization, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
3.EASA. ED decision no 2003/19/RM, 2003, European Aviation Safety Agency, Brussels.Google Scholar
4.Lee, S., Maa, Y. and Verstraeten, J. Product life-cycle management in aviation maintenance, repair and overhaul, Computers in Industry, 2008, 59, (2-3), pp 296–303.Google Scholar
5.Womack, J.P. and Jones, D.T. Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation, 1996, Simon & Schuster, New York, New York, US.Google Scholar
6.Ohno, T. Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production, 1988, Productivity Press, Oregon.Google Scholar
7.Hicks, B. Lean information management: Understanding and eliminating waste, Int J Information Management, 2007, 27, pp 233–248.Google Scholar
8.Bello-Pintado, A., Bayo‐Moriones, A. and Merino‐Díaz de Cerio, J. 5S use in manufacturing plants- contextual factors and impact on operating performance, Int J Qual & Rel Manage, 2010, 27, (2), pp 217–230.Google Scholar
9.Francis, M. Lean information and supply chain effectiveness, Int J Logistics Research and Applications, 1998, 1, (1), pp 93–108.Google Scholar
10.Mead, E.D. and Whitman, L.E. A lean enterprise model for document control, In Preprints of the 18th IFAC World Congress, 2011, Milano, Italy.Google Scholar
11.IATA. Operating Lease of Aircraft Guidance on Aircraft Lease Delivery and Return, 2013, International Air Transport Association, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
12.EASA. Easy Access Rules for Continuing Airworthiness (Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014), Official Journal of the European Union, 2014, L 362, pp 26-27.Google Scholar
13.Melton, T. To lean or not to lean? (that is the question!), The Chemical Engineer, 2004, pp 34–37.Google Scholar