Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T21:55:50.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Advanced combat aircraft performance assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

A. Kutschera  and
P. M. Render
A. Kutschera
Affiliation:
Loughborough University, UK
P. M. Render
Affiliation:
Loughborough University, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With the advent of thrust vector control and post stall manoeuvrability affecting the design of modern combat aircraft, there still remains a shortage of performance metric tools available to the conceptual designer. The need for such a tool is highlighted, and a suitable metric is introduced. Using the metric, the effects of thrust vector control and post stall manoeuvrability are investigated quantitatively for a 180° heading change in the horizontal plane, in terms of time to complete the manoeuvre, final Specific Excess Power, energy change over the manoeuvre and turn diameter. The extension of the metric to investigate different manoeuvres and the impact of other new technologies is briefly discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 106 , Issue 1062 , August 2002 , pp. 443 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Skow, A.M., Hamilton, W.L. and Taylor, J.H. Transient agility enhancements for tactical aircraft, Technical Report TR89-001, Eidetics International, Torrance California, January 1989.Google Scholar
2. Tamrat, B.F. Fighter agility assessment concepts and their implications on future agile fighter design, A/A4–88–4400-CP, AIAA Aircraft Design, Systems and Operations Meeting, September 1988.Google Scholar
3. McAtee, T.P. Agility in Demand, Aerospace America, May 1988, pp 36–38.Google Scholar
4. Kalviste, J. Roll reversal agility parameter, AFFDL, Aircraft Agility Workshop Summary Booklet, August 1989.Google Scholar
5. Liefer, R.K. Fighter agility metrics, Paper No NASA-CR-187289, January 1990.Google Scholar
6. Raymer, D.P. Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, AIAA Education Series, 1992.Google Scholar
7. Kutschera, A. and Render, P. Performance assessment of thrust vectoring controlled post stall manoeuvrable fighter aircraft using minimal input data, AMA-99–4020, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, August 1999.Google Scholar
8. Bitten, R. Qualitative and quantitative comparison of government and industry agility metrics, J Aircr, 1990, Volume 27, (3), pp 276–282.Google Scholar
9. Valasek, J. and Downing, D. An investigation of fighter aircraft agility-final, Technical Report, KU-FRL-831–7, Kansas University Flight Research Laboratory, November 1993.Google Scholar
10. Costes, P. Investigation of thrust vectoring and post stall capability in air combat, AIAA-88–4160-CP, 1988.Google Scholar
11. Hodgkinson, J, Skow, A,. Ettinger, R,. Lynch, U,. Laboy, O,. Chody, J,, and Cord, T.J. Relationships between flying qualties, transient agility, and operational effectiveness of fighter aircraft, Paper Number AIAA-88–4329, 1988.Google Scholar
12. Schwarzenbach, J. and Gill, K.F. System Modelling and Control, 2nd ed, Arnold, ISBN 0713135182,1984.Google Scholar
13. Bajpai, A.C., Mustoe, L.R., and Walker, D. Advanced Engineering Mathematics, 2nd ed, Published by Chichester:Wiley, 1990.Google Scholar
14. Edited by Lambert, M. Jane's All the Worlds Aircraft 1991–92, Jane's Information Group, 1992.Google Scholar
15. Airfleet Magazine, Russian airforce, aircraft and space review, PO Box 77, Moscow, Russia, Published by RA Intervestnik Publishing House, July 1999.Google Scholar
16. Herbst, W.B., and Krogull, B. Design for air combat, AIAA Paper No. 72–749, AIAA 4th Aircraft Design, Flight Test, and Operations Meeting, LA, CA, August 1972.Google Scholar
17. Shaw, R.L. Fighter Combat Tactics and Manoeuvring, Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, MD, USA, 1985.Google Scholar
18. Kutschera, A. and Render, P. Design tools for performance assessment of fighter aircraft incorporating new technologies, NATO-Research and Technology Agency, Advanced Vehicle Technology Symposium, 18–22 October 1999, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar