Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T15:15:13.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New commercial opportunities in space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

D. M. Ashford*
Affiliation:
Bristol Spaceplanes Limited, Bristol, UK

Abstract

This paper assesses new commercial opportunities in space. The main conclusion is that spaceplanes can reduce the cost of human transport to orbit sufficiently for large new commercial markets to develop. Combining the reusability of spaceplanes with the high traffic levels of space tourism offers the prospect of a thousandfold reduction in the cost per seat to orbit. The result will be airline operations to orbit involving dozens of spaceplanes, each capable of one or two flights per day. These low costs will make possible a rapid expansion of space science and exploration.

The prototype of a small orbital spaceplane, needed to trigger this line of development, could be developed in about six years at a cost comparable to one or two flights of the Space Shuttle. It might be possible to progress from this prototype to airline operations within ten years, given a massive development effort.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2007 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Koelle, D.E. and Kuczera, H., The Sänger design evolved over the years. The data used here are taken from Sänger – An advanced launcher system for Europe, IAF-87-207, presented at the 38th Congress of the IAF, Brighton, UK, October 1987.Google Scholar
2. Ashford, D.M., Spaceflight Revolution, Imperial College Press, 2002.Google Scholar
3. Ashford, D.M. and Collins, P.Q., The prospects for european aerospace transporters, Aeronaut J, 91, (927).Google Scholar
4. Dornberger, W.R., The rocket propelled commercial airliner, University of Minnesota, Institute of Technology, Research Report No 135, November 1956.Google Scholar
5. Cornog, R., Economics of rocket-propelled aeroplanes, Aeronaut Eng Review, September 1956.Google Scholar
6. Koelle, H.H., Assessing Re-usable Space vehicles, Astronautics and Aeronautics, June 1964.Google Scholar
7. Ashford, D.M., Boost glide vehicles for long range transport, J R Ae Soc, July 1965.Google Scholar
8. Penn, J.P. and Lindley, C.A., RLV design optimization for human presence in space, The Aerospace Corporation, 1997, (and other papers by these authors).Google Scholar
9. Space Tourism Market Study, Futron Corporation, 2002.Google Scholar
10. A Preliminary Feasibility Study of the Spacecab Low-Cost Spaceplane and of the Spacecab Demonstrator, Bristol Spaceplanes Limited Report TR 6, February 1994 Carried out under European Space Agency Contract No. 10411/93/F/TB. (Volume 1 reproduced as The Potential of Spaceplanes in the J Practical Applications in Space, Spring 1995)Google Scholar
11. Letter from Ian Taylor MBE MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Trade and Technology, to the Rt Hon Sir John Cope MP, March 1995.Google Scholar
12. Tolle, H., Review of European Aerospace Transporter Studies, Proceedings of SAE Space Technology Conference, Palo Alto, California, May 1967 (This paper describes designs by Bölkow, B.A.C., Bristol Siddeley, Dassault, ERNO, Hawker Siddeley, and Junkers.)Google Scholar
13. Tourism Cost Realities, Aviation Week, 4 February 2002, p 17.Google Scholar
14. Burt Rutan’s Quest for Space, Aviation Week, 21 April 2003.Google Scholar
15. Skin in the Game, Aviation Week, 9 October 2006, p 66.Google Scholar
16. SpaceShipThree poised to follow if SS2 succeeds, Flight International, 23-29 August 2005, p 25.Google Scholar
17. Hill, C.N., A Vertical Empire. The History of the UK Rocket and Space Programme, 19501971, Imperial College Press, 2001.Google Scholar
18. Winning in the next space market. A spaceworks engineering Inc (SEI) Case Study, January 2007.Google Scholar