Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T13:33:03.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-ray Topography and TEM Study of Crystal Defect Propagation in Epitaxially Grown AIGaAs Layers on GaAs(001)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

L. C. Bassignana
Affiliation:
Advanced Technology Laboratory, Bell-Northern Research Ottawa, Canada
D.A. Macquistan
Affiliation:
Advanced Technology Laboratory, Bell-Northern Research Ottawa, Canada
D.A. Clark
Affiliation:
Advanced Technology Laboratory, Bell-Northern Research Ottawa, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Asymmetric crystal topography (ACT) in reflection and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to investigate the crystal quality of both typical GaAs substrates and AIGaAs epitaxial layers grown on these substrates. ACT topographs of large sections of 75mm GaAs wafers revealed the presence of several types of crystal defects. All the GaAs wafers surveyed showed the presence of low angle grain boundaries which usually extended over a significant portion of the wafer. In addition, the well-known cell structure dislocation network was always observed in semi-insulating wafers. Less common but often present were inclusions and precipitates. The n-type (Si doped) substrates showed a typical cross-hatched pattern. ACT topography also easily revealed the crystal damage caused by wafer grinding.

Epitaxial layers of AIGaAs were grown by conventional molecular beam epitaxy on these characterized GaAs substrates. ACT topography was used to examine separately the epitaxial layers and substrate crystals. Layers which were grown below the pseudomorphic limit showed crystal features identical to the GaAs substrate on which they were grown and the substrate was unaffected by the presence of the epitaxial layer. AJAs layers which were grown above the pseudomorphic limit were severely dislocated: TEM confirmed the presence of misfit dislocations at the interface. The substrate in this case also showed the presence of crosshatching indicating the the extension of the dislocation strain field into the substrate.

Type
X. Crystallite Size/Strain Analysis
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Franzosi, P., Salviati, G., Genova, F., Stano, A., and Taiariol, F., “Misfit Dislocations in InGaAs/InP MBE Single Heterostructures”, J. Cryst. Growth 75: 521 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Chang, K. H., Bhattacharya, P. K., and Gibala, R., “Characteristics of Dislocations at Strained InGaAs/GaAs Interfaces”, J. Appl. Phys. 66(7):2993 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Houghton, D. C., Perovic, D. D., Baribeau, J. M., and Weatherly, G. C., “Misfit Strain Relaxation in GexSi1-x/Si Heterostructures: The Structural Stability of Buried Strained Layers and Strained-Layer Superlattices”, J. Appl.Phys. 67(4):1850 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Boettinger, W. J., Burdette, H. E., Kuriyama, M., and Green, R. E. Jr. “Asymmetric Crystal Topographic Camera”, Rev.Sci. Instrum. 47(8):906 (1976).Google Scholar
5. Howard, J. K. and Dobrott, R. D., “Compositional X-Ray Topography”, J. Electrochem. Soc. 113(6):567 (1966).Google Scholar
6. Chalt, H. and Packeiser, G., “High-Resolution Imaging of the EL2 Distribution in Thin Semi-Insulating GaAs Wafers; A Comparison with X-ray Topography”, J. Appl. Phys. 60(8):2954 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Matthews, J. W. and Blakeslee, A. E., “Defects in Epitaxial Multilayers”, J. Cryst. Growth 27:118(1974).Google Scholar
8. Matthews, J. W., Mader, S., and Light, T. B., “Accomodation of Misfit Across the Interface Between Crystals of Semiconducting Elements or Compounds”, J. Appl.Phys. 41(9):3800(1970).Google Scholar
9. Wagner, G.,Gottschalch, V., Rhan, H., and Paufler, P., “Pseudomorphic Growth and Nucleation of Misfit Dislocations in the Epitaxial System (001) InP/In1-xGaxAs”, Phys. Stat. Sol. 112: 519 (1989).Google Scholar