Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-26T03:33:45.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Use of Mass Absorption in Quantitative X-Ray Diffraction Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Briant L. Davis  and
L. Ronald Johnson
Briant L. Davis
Affiliation:
Cloud Physics Laboratory, Institute of Atmospheric Sciences, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, South Dakota 57701-3995
L. Ronald Johnson
Affiliation:
Cloud Physics Laboratory, Institute of Atmospheric Sciences, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, South Dakota 57701-3995
Get access

Extract

The mass absorption coefficient is perhaps the most under-utilized parameter in x-ray diffraction analysis. Mass absorption measurements are often avoided in quantitative analysis by resorting to calibration curves of internal standards (e.g., Kung and Alexander, 1974, Sec. 7-2.1). However, Leroux et al. (1953) and Frevel and Roth (1982) directly utilized the mass absorption coefficient in multicomponent analysis, and suggested a "substrate diffraction" procedure for directly measuring the sample mass absorption coefficient. The reference intensity procedure of quantitative multicomponent analysis originally formulated by Frank Chung (1974) requires no explicit use of the mass absorption coefficient because all reference intensity ratios are determined relative to an "external" standard, generally corundum (Al2O3).

Type
VI. Quantitative Phase Analysis by XRD
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 30: Thirty-Fifth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 4-8, 1986 , 1986 , pp. 333 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chung, F.A., 1974, A New x-ray diffraction method for quantitative multicomponent analysis. Adv. X-ray Anal., 17:106.Google Scholar
Davis, B.L., 1981, A Study of the errors in x-ray quantitative analysis procedures for Aerosols collected on filter media. Atmos. Environ., 15:291.Google Scholar
Davis, B.L., 1984, Reference intensity quantitative analysis using thin- layer aerosol samples. Adv. X-ray Anal., 27 :339.Google Scholar
Davis, B.I., 1986, Reference intensity method of multicomponent x-ray diffraction analysis. Media Center, S. D. School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD. 205 pp.Google Scholar
Davis, B.L., and Johnson, L.R., 1982a, On the use of various filter subs trates for quantitative particulate analysis by x-ray diffraction. Atmos. Environ. 16:2 73.Google Scholar
Davis, B.L., and Johnson, L.R., 1982b, Sample preparat ion and methodology for x-ray quantitative analysis of thin aerosol layers deposited on glass fiber and membrane filters. Adv. X-ray Anal. 25:295.Google Scholar
EPA. 1982, Interim method for the determination of asbestos in bulk insulation samples. EPA pub. EPA-600/M4-82-020, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.Google Scholar
Frevel, L.K., and Roth, W.C., 1982, Semimicro assay of crystal line phases by x-ray powder diffractometry. Anal. Chem., 54 :677.Google Scholar
Johnson, L.R., and Davis, B.L., 1982, X-ray diffraction quantitative analysis using the reference intensity method. Norelco Reporter, 29 : 2 : 28.Google Scholar
Klug, H.P., and Alexander, L., 1974, “X-ray Diffraction Procedures.“ J. Wiley and Sons, New York. 966 pp.Google Scholar
Lange, A., and Haartz, J.C., 1979, Determination of microgram quantities of asbestos by x-ray diffraction: Chrysotile in thin dust layers of matrix material. Anal. Chem., 51 : 520.Google Scholar
Leroux, J., Lennox, D.H., and Kay, K., 1953, Direct quantitative x-ray analysis. Anal. Chem. 25 : 740.Google Scholar