Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T02:11:33.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sodium and Magnesium Fluorescence Analysis—Part I: Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Burton L. Henke
Burton L. Henke*
Affiliation:
Pomona College Claremont, California
Get access

Abstract

As is well known, the fluorescent yield decreases very rapidly with the atomic number with the result, for example, that sensitive sodium and magnesium analysis is extremely difficult if not impossible with conventional X-ray spectrographs. It is demonstrated, however, that analysis for sodium and magnesium can be accomplished with sensitivity comparable to that conventionally obtained for elements such as aluminum, silicon, and phosphorous, providing that the conditions for excitation and measurement of the associated soft X-radiations are optimized, A high-intensity demountable tube using an aluminum anode has been developed which can be used interchangeably with the conventional spectrographic X-ray source. This provides a large amount of incident radiation, aluminum foil filtered, optimally close in wavelength to that of the line radiation being excited. A gypsum analyzing crystal is used along with greatly reduced beam collimation. The standard flow proportional counter and pulse height discrimination is employed. An appropriate filter, such as aluminum foil, is used as a window for the counter1 to provide further discrimination and enhanced signal-to-background ratio.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 6: Eleventh Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 8-10, 1962 , 1962 , pp. 361 - 376
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.See for example: Liebhafsky, H. A., et al., X-ray Absorption and Emission in Analytical Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1960.Google Scholar
2. Compton, A. H. and Allison, S. K., X-rays in Theory and Experiment, second edition, D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc., Princeton, N. J., 1935, p. 482.Google Scholar
3. Sandstrom, A. E., “Experimental Methods of X-ray Spectroscopy,” Htmdbuch Der Physik, Springer-Verlag, 1957.Google Scholar
4. Compton, A. H. and AlHson, S. K., X-rays in Theory and Experiment, second edition, D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc., Princeton, N.J., 1935, pp. 783–790.Google Scholar
5. Fine, S. and Hendee, C. F., A Table of X-ray K and L Emission and Critical Absorption Knergies for All the Elements, Philips Laboratories, Irvington-on-Hudson, New York.Google Scholar
6. Blolihin, M. A., The Physics of X-rays, second revised edition, Translation Series, United States Atomic Energy Commission, Office of Technical Information, AEC-TR-4502.Google Scholar
7. Cork, J. M., Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, Chemical Rubber Publishing Co., 1945.Google Scholar
8. Furnas, T. C. Jr. and White, E. W., WADD Technical Report 61-168, 1961.Google Scholar
9.A very useful work on the problem of excitation of the elements from atomic number 19 (K) to atomic number 13 (Al) has been recently accepted for publication by the Journal of Applied Physics—“The Target and Inherent Filtration as Factors in the Fluorescence Excitation of X-rays,” by Nathan Spielberg, Philips Laboratories, Irvkigton-on-Hudson, New York.Google Scholar