Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:48:46.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantitative X-ray Analysis of ICPP Simulated High Alumina Calcine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Paul Sliva
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802
Mary Bliss
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802
Barry E. Scheetz
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802
Get access

Abstract

High alumina radioactive waste calcine is produced at the Idaho Chemical Processing Plant (ICPP) by feeding a taw liquid waste stream through a fluidized bed calcitter. Further solidification of this calcine via chemical bonding necessitates determination of the amount of crystalline phase resulting from the calcination process. X-ray powder diffraction analysis of simulated (non-radioactive) ICPP high alumina calcine shows that it consists of an amorphous phase plus three phases of varying crystal Unity; alpha, beta and gamma alumina. Subsequent quantitative x-ray analysis of the three crystalline phases was carried out using the internal standard method with sodalite as the standard phase. Limited peak selection for the alumina phases required a correction for the presence of a small sodalite peak contained within the analyzed gamma alumina peak (4° two-theta base width). Results of this study show that the calcine is composed of ∼90 weight percent gamma alumina, less than 3-4 weight percent each of alpha and beta alumina and the remaining 4-6 weight percent an amorphous component.

Type
IX. XRD Search/Match Methods and Quantitative Analysis
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cullity, B.D., 1967, “Elements of X - ray Diffraction,” Addison-Wesley, Reading.Google Scholar
DOE, 1982, Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Inventories, Projections, and Characteristics, U.S. DOE Report NE-0017-1.Google Scholar
DiMilia, R., 1982, Personal Communication.Google Scholar
Gitzen, W.H. (ed.), 1970, “Alumina as a Ceramic Material,” The American Ceramic Society. Inc. Special Publication No. 4. OHIO.Google Scholar
Kirkbride, R.A., 1980, Development of a PelletedGoogle Scholar
Waste Form for High Level Alumina Wastes, Exxon Nuclear Idaho Company. Inc. Report 1051.Google Scholar
Kirkbride, R.A., 1980, Inventory of Calcined Waste Stored at the ICPP as of September 1979, Exxon Nuclear Idaho Company. Inc. Report 1044.Google Scholar
Klug, H.P. and Alexander, L.E., 1974, “X-ray Diffraction Procedures,” 2nd Edition, Wiley Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
Pomiak, G.S., Westra, A.G., and Wade, E.L., 1980, Stabilizing Sinulated ICPP Waste Calcine in a 10-cm Fluidized Bed, Exxon Nuclear Idaho Company, Inc. Report 1063.Google Scholar
Sliva, P., 1983, “Low-Temperature Processing and Phase Stability of an Aluminum Phosphate (Berlinite) Waste Form Applicable to High Aluminum Nuclear Defense Waste,” Masters Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA,Google Scholar