Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:01:38.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A High-Precision Kossel Camera for Research and Routine Analytical Use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

T. E. Reichard
T. E. Reichard*
Affiliation:
Monsanto Company St. Louis, Missouri
Get access

Abstract

A transmission Kossel camera unit has been built for the Cambridge Mark II electron probe. It replaces the standard specimen stage assembly, and is useful also for regular electron probe microanalysis and projection microradiography.

Its design extends the attainable precision of lattice parameter measurements to near-ultimate practical limits, while providing special features for research studies, and speed, flexibility, and convenience of operation for routine analytical use on a wide variety of specimens, particularly semiconductor materials.

The most significant feature is a novel X-ray projection box structure which casts index-mark images on each pattern. From these images, the exact source distance and pattern-center positions are determined for each exposure. Precise crystal-piane spacings can be measured, therefore, from conic intersections anywhere on the exposed area of the plate. Since the conics need not be in any particular favorable location, it is not necessary to achieve an exact orientation of the sample. Precise lattice dimensions in several different crystallographic directions are obtainable from a single pattern exposure if their various sensitive conics appear anywhere on the pattern. The need for a reference measurement of “fixed” conics is eliminated, being replaced by a much more precise measurement of very sharp, high contrast, widely spaced index-mark images.

Camera length is 12.5 cm and exposed pattern area is 9.4 cm square. Glass photo plates are used to eliminate errors due to film shrinkage and warp. A removable cassette holds ten 4″×5″ glass plates, interchangeableiunder vacuum. The X-ray shutter has ten positions for making exposure-time sequences. The specimen stage is thermostatted to ±0.01° C, controllable from room temperature up to 200° C, and;temperature is measured to +0.005° C. Stage movement range is 25mmx50mn, with coordinates shown on external digital dials. Interchangeable inserts provide for a wide range of specimen sizes and shapes. Electrical contacts to the specimen are available.

An externally adjustable plate holds 24 different target foils or target-filter combinations for pseudo-Kossel patterns. An open position provides for true Kossel work and for scatteredelectron image viewing.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 12: Seventeenth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 21-23, 1968 , 1968 , pp. 188 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kossel, W. and Vogues, H., “X-Ray Interferences in a Monocrystal Cathode”, Ann. Physik 23: 677–704, 1935.Google Scholar
2. Kossel, W., “Systematics of the Roentgen Reflections of a Snace Lattice”, Ann. Physik 25:512–526, 1936.Google Scholar
3. Kossel, W., “Measurements on a Complete Reflex System of a Crystal Lattice”, Ann. Physik 26:533–553, 1936.Google Scholar
4. Castaing, R., “Point-by-Point Chemical and Crystalloaranhic Analysis by an Electron-Beam Probe”, Recherche Aeronaut (Paris) 23:41–50, 1951.Google Scholar
5. Lonsdale, K., “Divergent Beam X-Ray Photography of Crystals”, Phil. Trans, Roy. Soc. London 240:219–250, 1947.Google Scholar
6. Peace, A. G. and Pringle, G. E., “Some Properties of Lines on Divergent-Beam X-Ray Photographs”, Phil. Mag. 43:1227–1242, 1952.Google Scholar
7. Heise, B. H., “Precision Determination of the Lattice Constant by the Kossel Line Technique”, J. Appl. Phys. 33:938–941, 1962.Google Scholar
8. Hanneman, R. E., Ogilvie, R. E., and Modrzejewski, A., “Kossel Line Studies of Irradiated Nickel Crystals”, J. Appl. Phys. 33:1429–1435, 1962.Google Scholar
9. Gielen, P., Yakowitz, H., Ganow, D., and Ogilvie, R. E., “Evaluat i on of Kossel Microdiffraction Procedures: The Cubic Case”, J. Appl. Phys. 36:773–782, 1965.Google Scholar
10. Yakowitz, H., “Precision of Cubic Lattice Parameter Measurements by the Kossel Technique”, in T. D. McKinley, K. F. J. Heinrich, and D. B. Wittry, Editors, “The Electron Microprobe”, John Wiley & Sons, New York 1966, pp. 417–438.Google Scholar
11. Pietrokowsky, P., “Lattice Parameter of Alpha Iron bv Divergent Beam Diffraction”, J. Appl. Phys. 37:4560–4571, 1966.Google Scholar
12. Morris, W. G., “Crystal Orientation and Lattice Parameters from Kossel Lines”, J. Appl. Phys. 39:1813–1823, 1968.Google Scholar
13. Heise, B. H., “Determination of the Orientation of Metal Grains by a New Kossel Line Technique”, J. Appl. Phys. 33:697–699, 1962.Google Scholar
14. Witt, F., Damiano, V. V., and London, G., “Application of the Electron Microscope for Production of Pseudo-Kossel Patterns and Their Use in the Determination of Lattice Constants of a Beryllium-4.4 Wt % Copper Alloy”, Rev. Sci. Inst. 38:1069–1073, 1967.Google Scholar
15. Weissmann, S., “Studies of Lattice Defects and Structure-Sensitive Properties of Materials”, Norelco Reporter X:108–113, 1963.Google Scholar
16. Umeno, M., Kawabe, H., and Shinoda, G., “Lattice Defect Research by Kossel Technique and Deformation Analysis” in G. R. Mallett, M. J. Fay, and W. M. Mueller, Editors, “Advances in X-Ray Analysis”, Vol. 9, Plenum Press, New York, 1966, pp. 23–34.Google Scholar
17. Sharpe, R. S., “Divergent Beam X-Ray Diffraction and I ts Application to Irradiated Magnesia”, Appl. Matl. Res. 4: 74–83, 1965.Google Scholar
18. Potts, H. R., Pearson, G. L., and Macres, V. G., “Precise Measurement of Semiconductor Single Crystal Lattice Parameters by the Kossel Line Technique”, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 8 :593, 1963.Google Scholar
19. Potts, H. R. and Pearson, G. L., “Annealing and Arsenic Overpressure Experiments on Defects in Gallium Arsenide”, J. Appl. Phys. 37:2098–2103, 1966.Google Scholar
20. Moudy, L. A. and Laakso, C. W., “Orientation and Lattice Parameter Determination of Electronic Materials by X-Ray Divergent Beam Photography”, First National Conference on Electron Probe Microanalysis, College Park, Md., 1966.Google Scholar
21. Black, J. and Lublin, P., “Electrical Measurements and X-Ray Lattice Parameter Measurements of GaAs Doped with Se, Te, Zn, and Cd and the Stress Effects of These Elements as Diffusants in GaAs”, J. Appl. Phys. 35:2462–2467, 1964.Google Scholar
22. Moyer, N. E., “Precision X-Ray Studies of Electron Irradiated Silicon”, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 10: 320, 1965.Google Scholar
23. Straumanis, M. E. and Kim, C. D., “Phase Extent of Gallium Arsenide Determined by the Lattice Constant and Density Method”, Acta. Cryst. 19:256–259, 1965.Google Scholar
24. Pierron, E. D. and McNeely, J. B., “Precise Cell Parameters of Semiconductor Crystals and Their Applications”, 17th Denver X-Ray Conference, Estes Park, Colorado, 1968.Google Scholar
25. Campbell, W. J. and Brown, J. D., “X-Ray Absorption and Emission”, Analytical Chemistry 40, Annual Reviews, 346R-375R (Kossel techniques p. 367R-368R) 1968.Google Scholar
26. Ogilvie, R. E., “Accuracy of Lattice Parameter Measurement by the Kossel Technique”, Paper No. 216, Electrochemical Society Meeting, Washington, D. C. (Oct. 1964).Google Scholar
27. Ogilvie, R. E., Private Communication; to be published.Google Scholar
28. Pittaway, L. G., “The Temperature Distributions in Thin Foil and Semi-Infinite Targets Bombarded by an Electron Beam”, Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 15:967–982, 1964.Google Scholar
29. Czaja, W. and Patel, J. R., “Observations of Individual Dislocations and Oxygen Precipitates in Silicon with a Scanning Electron Beam Method”, J. Appl. Phys. 36:1476–1482, 1965.Google Scholar
30. Yakowitz, H., “Effect of Sample Thickness and Operating Voltage on the contrast of Kossel Transmission Photographs”, J. Appl. Phys. 37:4455–4458, 1966.Google Scholar
31. Schneider, J. and Weik, H., “Investigations of Single Crystals by Divergent-Beam X-Rays”, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 11:127, 1966.Google Scholar
32. Bearden, J. A., “X-Ray Wavelengths”, U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Final Report on Contract AT (30-1)-2543, 1964.Google Scholar