Skip to main content Accessibility help

A High-Precision Kossel Camera for Research and Routine Analytical Use

  • T. E. Reichard (a1)


A transmission Kossel camera unit has been built for the Cambridge Mark II electron probe. It replaces the standard specimen stage assembly, and is useful also for regular electron probe microanalysis and projection microradiography.

Its design extends the attainable precision of lattice parameter measurements to near-ultimate practical limits, while providing special features for research studies, and speed, flexibility, and convenience of operation for routine analytical use on a wide variety of specimens, particularly semiconductor materials.

The most significant feature is a novel X-ray projection box structure which casts index-mark images on each pattern. From these images, the exact source distance and pattern-center positions are determined for each exposure. Precise crystal-piane spacings can be measured, therefore, from conic intersections anywhere on the exposed area of the plate. Since the conics need not be in any particular favorable location, it is not necessary to achieve an exact orientation of the sample. Precise lattice dimensions in several different crystallographic directions are obtainable from a single pattern exposure if their various sensitive conics appear anywhere on the pattern. The need for a reference measurement of “fixed” conics is eliminated, being replaced by a much more precise measurement of very sharp, high contrast, widely spaced index-mark images.

Camera length is 12.5 cm and exposed pattern area is 9.4 cm square. Glass photo plates are used to eliminate errors due to film shrinkage and warp. A removable cassette holds ten 4″×5″ glass plates, interchangeableiunder vacuum. The X-ray shutter has ten positions for making exposure-time sequences. The specimen stage is thermostatted to ±0.01° C, controllable from room temperature up to 200° C, and;temperature is measured to +0.005° C. Stage movement range is 25mmx50mn, with coordinates shown on external digital dials. Interchangeable inserts provide for a wide range of specimen sizes and shapes. Electrical contacts to the specimen are available.

An externally adjustable plate holds 24 different target foils or target-filter combinations for pseudo-Kossel patterns. An open position provides for true Kossel work and for scatteredelectron image viewing.



Hide All
1. Kossel, W. and Vogues, H., “X-Ray Interferences in a Monocrystal Cathode”, Ann. Physik 23: 677704, 1935.
2. Kossel, W., “Systematics of the Roentgen Reflections of a Snace Lattice”, Ann. Physik 25:512526, 1936.
3. Kossel, W., “Measurements on a Complete Reflex System of a Crystal Lattice”, Ann. Physik 26:533553, 1936.
4. Castaing, R., “Point-by-Point Chemical and Crystalloaranhic Analysis by an Electron-Beam Probe”, Recherche Aeronaut (Paris) 23:4150, 1951.
5. Lonsdale, K., “Divergent Beam X-Ray Photography of Crystals”, Phil. Trans, Roy. Soc. London 240:219250, 1947.
6. Peace, A. G. and Pringle, G. E., “Some Properties of Lines on Divergent-Beam X-Ray Photographs”, Phil. Mag. 43:12271242, 1952.
7. Heise, B. H., “Precision Determination of the Lattice Constant by the Kossel Line Technique”, J. Appl. Phys. 33:938941, 1962.
8. Hanneman, R. E., Ogilvie, R. E., and Modrzejewski, A., “Kossel Line Studies of Irradiated Nickel Crystals”, J. Appl. Phys. 33:14291435, 1962.
9. Gielen, P., Yakowitz, H., Ganow, D., and Ogilvie, R. E., “Evaluat i on of Kossel Microdiffraction Procedures: The Cubic Case”, J. Appl. Phys. 36:773782, 1965.
10. Yakowitz, H., “Precision of Cubic Lattice Parameter Measurements by the Kossel Technique”, in T. D. McKinley, K. F. J. Heinrich, and D. B. Wittry, Editors, “The Electron Microprobe”, John Wiley & Sons, New York 1966, pp. 417438.
11. Pietrokowsky, P., “Lattice Parameter of Alpha Iron bv Divergent Beam Diffraction”, J. Appl. Phys. 37:45604571, 1966.
12. Morris, W. G., “Crystal Orientation and Lattice Parameters from Kossel Lines”, J. Appl. Phys. 39:18131823, 1968.
13. Heise, B. H., “Determination of the Orientation of Metal Grains by a New Kossel Line Technique”, J. Appl. Phys. 33:697699, 1962.
14. Witt, F., Damiano, V. V., and London, G., “Application of the Electron Microscope for Production of Pseudo-Kossel Patterns and Their Use in the Determination of Lattice Constants of a Beryllium-4.4 Wt % Copper Alloy”, Rev. Sci. Inst. 38:10691073, 1967.
15. Weissmann, S., “Studies of Lattice Defects and Structure-Sensitive Properties of Materials”, Norelco Reporter X:108113, 1963.
16. Umeno, M., Kawabe, H., and Shinoda, G., “Lattice Defect Research by Kossel Technique and Deformation Analysis” in G. R. Mallett, M. J. Fay, and W. M. Mueller, Editors, “Advances in X-Ray Analysis”, Vol. 9, Plenum Press, New York, 1966, pp. 2334.
17. Sharpe, R. S., “Divergent Beam X-Ray Diffraction and I ts Application to Irradiated Magnesia”, Appl. Matl. Res. 4: 7483, 1965.
18. Potts, H. R., Pearson, G. L., and Macres, V. G., “Precise Measurement of Semiconductor Single Crystal Lattice Parameters by the Kossel Line Technique”, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 8 :593, 1963.
19. Potts, H. R. and Pearson, G. L., “Annealing and Arsenic Overpressure Experiments on Defects in Gallium Arsenide”, J. Appl. Phys. 37:20982103, 1966.
20. Moudy, L. A. and Laakso, C. W., “Orientation and Lattice Parameter Determination of Electronic Materials by X-Ray Divergent Beam Photography”, First National Conference on Electron Probe Microanalysis, College Park, Md., 1966.
21. Black, J. and Lublin, P., “Electrical Measurements and X-Ray Lattice Parameter Measurements of GaAs Doped with Se, Te, Zn, and Cd and the Stress Effects of These Elements as Diffusants in GaAs”, J. Appl. Phys. 35:24622467, 1964.
22. Moyer, N. E., “Precision X-Ray Studies of Electron Irradiated Silicon”, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 10: 320, 1965.
23. Straumanis, M. E. and Kim, C. D., “Phase Extent of Gallium Arsenide Determined by the Lattice Constant and Density Method”, Acta. Cryst. 19:256259, 1965.
24. Pierron, E. D. and McNeely, J. B., “Precise Cell Parameters of Semiconductor Crystals and Their Applications”, 17th Denver X-Ray Conference, Estes Park, Colorado, 1968.
25. Campbell, W. J. and Brown, J. D., “X-Ray Absorption and Emission”, Analytical Chemistry 40, Annual Reviews, 346R-375R (Kossel techniques p. 367R-368R) 1968.
26. Ogilvie, R. E., “Accuracy of Lattice Parameter Measurement by the Kossel Technique”, Paper No. 216, Electrochemical Society Meeting, Washington, D. C. (Oct. 1964).
27. Ogilvie, R. E., Private Communication; to be published.
28. Pittaway, L. G., “The Temperature Distributions in Thin Foil and Semi-Infinite Targets Bombarded by an Electron Beam”, Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 15:967982, 1964.
29. Czaja, W. and Patel, J. R., “Observations of Individual Dislocations and Oxygen Precipitates in Silicon with a Scanning Electron Beam Method”, J. Appl. Phys. 36:14761482, 1965.
30. Yakowitz, H., “Effect of Sample Thickness and Operating Voltage on the contrast of Kossel Transmission Photographs”, J. Appl. Phys. 37:44554458, 1966.
31. Schneider, J. and Weik, H., “Investigations of Single Crystals by Divergent-Beam X-Rays”, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 11:127, 1966.
32. Bearden, J. A., “X-Ray Wavelengths”, U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Final Report on Contract AT (30-1)-2543, 1964.

A High-Precision Kossel Camera for Research and Routine Analytical Use

  • T. E. Reichard (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed