Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T15:31:02.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Application of Gandolfi X-Ray Diffraction to the Characterization of Reaction Products from the Alteration of Simulated Nuclear Wastes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

C. A. F. Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
M. E. Zolensky
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
D. K. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
W. P. Freeborn
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
B. E. Scheetz
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Get access

Abstract

Accurate phase characterization of the alteration products of rad-waste requires the separation and identification of scattered individual grains from among the bulk product. These grains are typically 5 to 100 μm in size. Bulk x-ray powder diffraction will normally not detect these minor phases, and even if the phase can be detected, it often may not be identifiable. The use of the Gandolfi technique with the individual particle not only facilitates the identification, but also allows the assignment of the identification to the specific grain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartlett, J. W. (Task Leader), 1976, “Alternatives for Managing Wastes from Reactors and Post-Fission Operations in the LWR Fuel Cycle,” Vol. 4, ERDA-76-43.Google Scholar
Freeborn, W. P., Zolensky, M., Scheetz, B. E., Komarneni, S., McCarthy, G. J., and White, W. B., (submitted 15 July 1979), “Hydrothermal Interaction Between Calcine, Glass Spent Fuel and Ceramic V Jaste Forms with Representative Shale Repository Rocks”, Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
Gandolfi, G., 1976, Miner. Petrog. Acta, 13:6774.Google Scholar
Johnstone, J. K., Headly, T. J., Hlava, P. F., and Stohl, F. V., 1979, In : “Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management”, Vol. 1, McCarthy, G. J., ed., Plenum Press, New York, p. 211217.Google Scholar
Ka RW-Bransle-Sakerhet, 1978, “Handling and Final Storage of Unprocessed Spent Nuclear Fuel”, Vol. 1: General, AB Teleplan SOLNA, Karnbraslesakerhet, FACK, S-102 40 Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 53-60.Google Scholar
McCarthy, G. J., 1977, “Advanced Waste Forms Research and Development Comprehensive Progress Report”, The Pennsylvania State University, FRDA-COO-2510.Google Scholar
McCarthy, G. J., White, W. B., Roy, R., Scheetz, B. E., Komarneni, S., Smith, D. K., and Roy, D. M., 1978, Nature, 273:216217.Google Scholar
McCarthy, G. J., Scheetz, B. E., Komarneni, S., Smith, D. K., and White, W. B., “Hydrothermal Stability of Simulated Radioactive Waste Glass”, Advances in Chemistry Series (in press).Google Scholar
McCrone, W. C. and Delly, J. G., 1973,“The Particle Atlas”. 2nd ed., Ann Arbor Science Publishers Inc., pp. 119-129.Google Scholar
Mendel, J. E. et al., 1977, “Annual Report on the Characteristics of High Level Waste Glasses”, BNWL-2252, Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland, Washington.Google Scholar
Ringwood, A. E. and Kesson, S. E., 1979, in: “Ceramics in Nuclear Waste Management”, Chikalla, T. D. and Mendel, J. E., eds., Proceedings of an International Symposium Held in Cincinnati, Ohio on April 30-May 2, 1979, Sponsored by The Nuclear Division of the American Ceramic Society and DOE, pp. 174-178.Google Scholar
Simmons, J. H., Macedo, P. B., Bankatt, A., and Litorivtz, T. A., 1979. Nature, 278:729731.Google Scholar
Straumanis, M. E., 1949, J. Appl. Phys., 20:726.Google Scholar