Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:39:35.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The time to ruin for a class of Markov additive risk process with two-sided jumps

Part of: Stochastic processes Special processes Markov processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

Martin Jacobsen
Martin Jacobsen*
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
*
∗ Postal address: Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, University of Copenhagen, 5, Universitetsparken, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. Email address: martin@math.ku.dk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We consider risk processes that locally behave like Brownian motion with some drift and variance, these both depending on an underlying Markov chain that is also used to generate the claims arrival process. Thus, claims arrive according to a renewal process with waiting times of phase type. Positive claims (downward jumps) are always possible but negative claims (upward jumps) are also allowed. The claims are assumed to form an independent, identically distributed sequence, independent of everything else. As main results, the joint Laplace transform of the time to ruin and the undershoot at ruin, as well as the probability of ruin, are explicitly determined under the assumption that the Laplace transform of the positive claims is a rational function. Both the joint Laplace transform and the ruin probability are decomposed according to the type of ruin: ruin by jump or ruin by continuity. The methods used involve finding certain martingales by first finding partial eigenfunctions for the generator of the Markov process composed of the risk process and the underlying Markov chain. We also use certain results from complex function theory as important tools.

Keywords

Probability of ruintime to ruinundershootpassage timemartingaleoptional samplingadditive processRouché's theorem

MSC classification

Primary: 60G40: Stopping times; optimal stopping problems; gambling theory 60J25: Continuous-time Markov processes on general state spaces 60K15: Markov renewal processes, semi-Markov processes
Secondary: 60G44: Martingales with continuous parameter 60J35: Transition functions, generators and resolvents 60J60: Diffusion processes
Type
General Applied Probability
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 963 - 992
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2005 

References

Asmussen, S. (2000). Ruin Probabilities (Adv. Ser. Statist. Sci. Appl. Prob. 2). World Scientific, River Edge, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmussen, S., Avram, F. and Pistorius, M. R. (2004). Russian and American put options under exponential phase-type Lévy models. Stoch. Process. Appl. 109, 79–111.Google Scholar
Avram, F. and Usábel, M. (2004). Ruin probabilities and deficit for the renewal risk model with phase-type interarrival times. Astin Bull. 34, 315–332.Google Scholar
Avram, F., Kyprianou, A. E. and Pistorius, M. R. (2004). Exit problems for spectrally negative Lévy processes and applications to (Canadized) Russian options. Ann. Appl. Prob. 14, 215–238.Google Scholar
Bertoin, J. (1997). Exponential decay and ergodicity of completely asymmetric Lévy processes in a finite interval. Ann. Appl. Prob. 7, 156–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. H. A. (1993). Markov Models and Optimization (Monogr. Statist. Appl. Prob. 49). Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Dickson, D. C. M. and Hipp, C. (1998). Ruin probabilities for Erlang(2) risk processes. Insurance Math. Econom. 22, 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embrechts, P., Grandell, J. and Schmidli, H. (1993). Finite-time Lundberg inequalities in the Cox case. Scand. Actuarial J.. 1993, 17–41.Google Scholar
Emery, D. J. (1973). Exit problem for a spectrally positive process. Adv. Appl. Prob. 5, 498–520.Google Scholar
Gusak, D. V. (1969). On the Joint distribution of the first exit time and exit value for homogeneous processes with independent increments. Theory Prob. Appl. 14, 14–23.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, M. (2003). Martingales and the distribution of the time to ruin. Stoch. Process. Appl. 107, 29–51.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, M. (2005). Point Processes, Theory and Applications: Marked Point and Piecewise Deterministic Processes. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Kou, S. G. and Wang, H. (2003). First passage times of a Jump diffusion process. Adv. Appl. Prob. 35, 504–531.Google Scholar
Kyprianou, A. E. and Palmowski, Z. (2003). Fluctuations of spectrally negative Markov additive processes. Submitted.Google Scholar
Last, G. and Brandt, A. (1995). Marked Point Processes on the Real Line. The Dynamic Approach (Prob. Appl. (NY)). Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Paulsen, J. and Gjessing, H. K. (1997). Ruin theory with stochastic return on investments. Adv. Appl. Prob. 29, 965–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolver Jensen, A. (2004). The distribution of various hitting times for a shot noise process with two-sided Jumps. Preprint 6, Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Winkel, M. (2005). Electronic foreign-exchange markets and passage events of independent subordinators. J. Appl. Prob. 42, 138–152.Google Scholar