Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:52:01.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimal stopping rule for the full-information duration problem with random horizon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2016

Mitsushi Tamaki*
Affiliation:
Aichi University
*
* Postal address: Faculty of Business Administration, Aichi University, Nagoya Campus, Hiraike 4-60-6, Nakamura, Nagoya, Aichi, 453-8777, Japan. Email address: tamaki@vega.aichi-u.ac.jp

Abstract

The full-information duration problem with a random number N of objects is considered. These objects appear sequentially and their values Xk are observed, where Xk, independent of N, are independent and identically distributed random variables from a known continuous distribution. The objective of the problem is to find a stopping rule that maximizes the duration of holding a relative maximum (e.g. the kth object is a relative maximum if Xk = max{X1, X2, . . ., Xk}). We assume that N is a random variable with a known upper bound n, so two models, Model 1 and Model 2, can be considered according to whether the planning horizon is N or n. The structure of the optimal rule, which depends on the prior distribution assumed on N, is examined. The monotone rule is defined and a necessary and sufficient condition for the optimal rule to be monotone is given for both models. Special attention is paid to the class of priors such that N / n converges, as n → ∞, to a random variable Vm having density fVm(v) = m(1 - v)m-1, 0 ≤ v ≤ 1 for a positive integer m. An interesting feature is that the optimal duration (relative to n) for Model 2 is just (m + 1) times as large as that for Model 1 asymptotically.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ferguson, T. S., Hardwick, J. P. and Tamaki, M. (1992). Maximizing the duration of owning a relatively best object. In Strategies for Sequential Search and Selection in Real Time (Contemp. Math. 125), American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, pp. 3757. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, J. P. and Mosteller, F. (1966). Recognizing the maximum of a sequence. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 61, 3573. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnedin, A. V. (1996). On the full information best-choice problem. J. Appl. Prob. 33, 678687. Google Scholar
Gnedin, A. V. (2004). Best choice from the planar Poisson process. Stoch. Process. Appl. 111, 317354. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazalov, V. V. and Tamaki, M. (2006). An explicit formula for the optimal gain in the full-information problem of owning a relatively best object. J. Appl. Prob. 43, 87101. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porosinski, Z. (1987). The full-information best choice problem with a random number of observations. Stoch. Process. Appl. 24, 293307. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuel-Cahn, E. (1996). Optimal stopping with random horizon with application to the full-information best-choice problem with random freeze. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 91, 357364. Google Scholar
Samuels, S. M. (1991). Secretary problems. In Handbook of Sequential Analysis, Dekker, New York, 381405. Google Scholar
Samuels, S. M. (2004). Why do these quite different best-choice problems have the same solutions? Adv. Appl. Prob. 36, 398416. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamaki, M. (2013). Optimal stopping rule for the no-information duration problem with random horizon. Adv. Appl. Prob. 45, 10281048. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamaki, M. (2015). On the optimal stopping problems with monotone thresholds. J. Appl. Prob. 52, 926940. Google Scholar