Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Melancholic symptoms as assessed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and outcomes with and without electroconvulsive therapy on an in-patient mood disorders unit

  • Keith G. Rasmussen (a1), Susanna R. Stevens (a2), Simon Kung (a1) and Amit Mohan (a1)

Abstract

Rasmussen KG, Stevens SR, Kung S, Mohan A. Melancholic symptoms as assessed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and outcomes with and without electroconvulsive therapy on an in-patient mood disorders unit.

Background:

We investigated whether 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HamD24)-based melancholia ratings correlated with treatment outcome, with special focus on whether electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) was used in depressed patients treated on an in-patient mood disorders unit.

Methods:

We analysed the data on ECT- versus non-ECT-treated patients' outcomes relative to melancholia subscale scores. Two HamD24-based melancholia rating scale scores were computed for 201 depressed in-patients at admission and discharge. Baseline melancholia ratings were analysed to see if they correlated with improvement in total HamD24 scores. We also tested to see if the melancholia subscales followed unimodal or bimodal distributions.

Results:

Melancholic symptoms as assessed by one of the HamD24-based subscales directly correlated with overall improvement. Although ECT treatment was associated with greater improvement than was noted in non-ECT-treated patients, severity of melancholia ratings did not affect this relationship. Finally, both melancholia subscale scores followed approximately unimodal distributions.

Conclusions:

HamD24-based methods to assess severity of melancholic symptoms have limited clinical utility on an in-patient mood disorders unit in general, and for predicting ECT response in particular. Furthermore, these methods do not seem to identify bimodal populations of depressed patients (i.e. melancholic vs. non-melancholic).

Copyright

Corresponding author

Keith G. Rasmussen, M.D., Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. Tel: 507-284-3789; Fax: 507-284-4158; E-mail: rasmussen.keith@mayo.edu

References

Hide All
1.Williams, JBW.Standardizing the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: past, present, and future. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2001;251:(Suppl. 2):II/6II/12.
2.Thase, ME, Hersen, M, Bellack, AS, Himmelhoch, JM, Kupfer, DJ.Validation of a Hamilton subscale for endogenomorphic depression. J Affect Disord 1983;5:67278.
3.Kovacs, M, Rush, AJ, Beck, AT, Hollon, SD.Depressed outpatients treated with cognitive therapy or pharmacotherapy–a one-year follow-up. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981;8:3339.
4.Endicott, J, Cohen, J, Nee, J, Fleiss, J, Sarantakos, S.Hamilton depression rating scale–extracted from regular and change versions of the schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981;38: 98103.
5.Overall, JE, Rhoades, HM.Use of the Hamilton rating scale for classification of depressive disorders. Compr Psychiatry 1982;23:370376.
6.Klein, DF.Endogenomorphic depression–a conceptual and terminological revision. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1974;31: 447454.
7.Prudic, J, Devanand, DP, Sackeim, HA, Decina, P, Kerr, B.Relative response of endogenous and non-endogenous symptoms to electroconvulsive therapy. J Affect Disord. 1989;16:5964.
8.Spitzer, R, Endicott, J, Robins, E.Research diagnostic criteria. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978;34:773782.
9.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd edn. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1980.
10.Taylor, MA, Fink, M.Melancholia: the diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment of depressive illness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
11.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn–text revision. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
12.Parker, G, Hadzi-Pavlovic, D, eds. Melancholia: a disorder of movement and mood. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
13.Fink, M, Rush, AJ, Knapp, RG, et al. Melancholic features are unreliable predictors of ECT response. A CORE publication. J ECT 2007;23:139146.
14.First, MB, Spitzer, RL, Gibbon, M, Williams, JBW.Structured clinical interview for axis I DSM-IV disorders-patient edition (SCID-I/P, Version∼2.0). New York: Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1995.
15.Bailine, SH, Rifkin, A, Kayne, E, et al. Comparison of bifrontal and bitemporal ECT for major depression. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157:121123.
16.Sackeim, HA, Prudic, J, Devanand, DP, et al. Effects of stimulus intensity and electrode placement on the efficacy and cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy. N Engl J Med 1993;328:839846.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed