Skip to main content Accessibility help

A clinimetric analysis of a BPRS-6 scale for schizophrenia severity

  • Per Bech (a1), Stephen F Austin (a1), Nina Timmerby (a1), Thomas A Ban (a2) and Stine Bjerrum Møller (a1)...



A restricted Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS-6) with the six schizophrenia specific items from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) has been investigated. These six items from the PANSS have recently been found to have both clinical validity and ‘unidimensionality’ in measuring the severity of schizophrenic states. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical validity of the BPRS-6. The secondary objective was to evaluate the ‘unidimensionality’ of the BPRS-6 by an ‘item response theory’ model.


The BPRS-6 was scored independently by two psychiatrists and two psychologists while viewing six open-ended videotaped interviews in patients with a DSM-III diagnosis of schizophrenia. The interviews were conducted by Heinz E. Lehmann, an experienced psychiatrist. They were focused on the psychopathology that contributed most to the ‘severity’ of the patient’s clinical state.


The BPRS-6 with three positive symptoms (delusions, conceptual disorganisation, hallucinations) and three negative symptoms (blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poverty of speech) was found to be clinically valid and captured the variables that contribute most to the severity of schizophrenia. The BPRS-6 was also found to have acceptable ‘unidimensionality’ (coefficient of homogeneity 0.45) and inter-rater reliability (inter-class-coefficient 0.81).


The BPRS-6 was found to capture the information that translates into the severity of schizophrenia. It has also acceptable psychometric validity.


Corresponding author

Per Bech, Psychiatric Research Unit, Mental Health Centre North Zealand, University of Copenhagen, Dyrehavevej 48, DK-3400 Hillerød, Denmark. Tel: +45 38 64 30 95; Fax: +45 38 64 30 99; E-mail:


Hide All
1 Bech, P. Clinical psychometrics. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2012.
2 Bech, P. Measurement-based care in mental disorders. New York: Springer, 2016.
3 Feinstein, AR. Clinimetrics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987.
4 Tomba, E, Bech, P. Clinimetrics and clinical psychometrics: macro- and microanalysis. Psychother Psychosom 2012;81:333343.
5 Bech, P, Allerup, P, Rosenberg, R. The Marke-Nyman temperament scale. Evaluation of transferability using the Rasch item analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1978;57:4958.
6 Bech, P, Allerup, P, Gram, LF et al. The Hamilton depression scale. Evaluation of objectivity using logistic models. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1981;63:290299.
7 Rasch, G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research. Expanded Edition Chicago: Chicago University Press 1980, 1960.
8 Hamilton, M. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 1967;6:278296.
9 Timmerby, N, Andersen, JH, Søndergaard, S, Østergaard, SD, Bech, P. A systematic review of the clinimetric properties of the 6-item version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D6). Psychother Psychosom 2017;86:141149.
10 Kay, SR. Positive-negative symptom assessment in schizophrenia: psychometric issues and scale comparison. Psychiatr Q 1990;61:163178.
11 Krawiecka, M, Goldberg, D, Vaughan, M. A standardized psychiatric assessment scale for rating chronic psychotic patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1977;55:299308.
12 Ostergaard, SD, Lemming, OM, Mors, O, Correll, CU, Bech, P. PANSS-6: a brief rating scale for the measurement of severity in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2016;133:436444.
13 Andreasen, NC, Carpenter, WT Jr, Kane, JM, Lasser, RA, Marder, SR, Weinberger, DR. Remission in schizophrenia: proposed criteria and rationale for consensus. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162:441449.
14 Overall, JE, Gorham, DR. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychological reports 1962;10:799812.
15 Overall, JE, Hollister, LE. Assessment of depression using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. In Sartorius N, Ban TA editors Assessment of depression. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1986; p. 159178.
16 Blackwell, B. Heinz Edgar Lehmann, 2015. Available at Accessed 19 April 2016.
17 Roth, M. The clinical interview and psychiatric diagnosis: have they a future in psychiatric practice? Compr Psychiatry 1967;8:427428.
18 Mokken, RJ. Theory and practice of scale analysis. Berlin: Mouton, 1971.
19 Bartko, JJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep 1966;19:311.
20 Landis, JR, Koch, GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159174.
21 Molenaar, IW, Debels, P, Sijtsna, K. User’s manual MSP, a program for Mokken scale analyses for polytomous items (version 3.0). Groeningen, the Netherlands: ProGAMMA, 1994.
22 Siegel, S. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. New York: McGraw Hill, 1956.
23 Katz, MM. Clinical trials of antidepressants. New York: Springer Verlag, 2016.
24 Lehmann, HE, Ban, TA, Donald, M. Rating the rater. An experimental approach to the methodological problem of interrater agreement. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1965;13:6775.
25 Bech, P. Rating scales for psychopathology, health status and quality of life. A compendium on documentation in accordance with the DSM-III-R and WHO systems. Berlin: Springer, 1993.


A clinimetric analysis of a BPRS-6 scale for schizophrenia severity

  • Per Bech (a1), Stephen F Austin (a1), Nina Timmerby (a1), Thomas A Ban (a2) and Stine Bjerrum Møller (a1)...


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed