Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:55:38.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stakeholder Theory

Concepts and Strategies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2018

R. Edward Freeman
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Jeffrey S. Harrison
Affiliation:
University of Richmond
Stelios Zyglidopoulos
Affiliation:
Kedge Business School

Summary

The stakeholder perspective is an alternative way of understanding how companies and people create value and trade with each other. Freeman, Harrison and Zyglidopoulos discuss the foundation concepts and implementation of stakeholder management as well as the advantages this approach provides to firms and their managers. They present a number of tools that managers can use to implement stakeholder thinking, better understand stakeholders and create value with and for them. The Element concludes by discussing how managers can create stakeholder oriented control systems and by examining some of the important stakeholder-related issues that are worthy of future scholarly and managerial attention.
Get access
Type
Element
Information
Online ISBN: 9781108539500
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 30 August 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Freeman, R. Edward. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman, 1984 (republished in 2010 by Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward, Harrison, Jeffrey S., & Wicks, Andrew C. Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation and success. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward, Harrison, Jeffrey S., Wicks, Andrew C., Parmar, Bidhan, & de Colle, Simone. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Andrew L., & Miles, Samantha. Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Robert. Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2003.Google Scholar
Sachs, Sybille, & Rühli, Edwin. Stakeholders matter: A new paradigm for strategy in society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Freeman, R. Edward, Wicks, Andrew, C., & Parmar, Bidhan 2004. Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited.” Organization Science, 15(3), 364369.Google Scholar
Harrison, Jeffrey S., & Bosse, Douglas A. 2013. How much is too much? The limits to generous treatment of stakeholders. Business Horizons, 56(3), 313322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Jeffrey S., Bosse, Douglas A., & Phillips, Robert A. 2010. Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 5874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Jeffrey S., & St. John, Caron H. 1996. Managing and partnering with external stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 10(2), 4660.Google Scholar
Jones, Thomas M. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McVea, John F., & Freeman, R. Edward. 2005. A names-and-faces approach to stakeholder management: How focusing on stakeholders as individuals can bring ethics and entrepreneurial strategy together. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(1), 5769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Robert, Freeman, R. Edward, & Wicks, Andrew C. 2003. What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strand, Robert, & Freeman, R. Edward. 2015. Scandinavian cooperative advantage: The theory and practice of stakeholder engagement in Scandinavia. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 6585.Google Scholar
Zyglidopoulos, Stelios C. 2002. The social and environmental responsibilities of multinationals: Evidence from the Brent Spar case. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(1–2), 141151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zyglidopoulos, Stelios C. 2003. The issue life-cycle: Implications for reputation for social performance and organizational legitimacy.” Corporate Reputation Review, 6(1), 7081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Stakeholder Theory
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Stakeholder Theory
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Stakeholder Theory
Available formats
×